Monte,
Exactly what do you mean by overlapping operations and what problem does the overlapping operations issue cause?
Thanks!
Michelle
Exactly what do you mean by overlapping operations and what problem does the overlapping operations issue cause?
Thanks!
Michelle
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Monte" <monte.tomerlin@...> wrote:
>
> Global Finite Scheduling is the single most powerful utility in v6.1 and I would encourage you to use it. The procedures you outlined are correct but there is much more to consider. All of the data, both static and transactional data, which is required by GFS to function must be accurate and timely for GFS to be accurate. There is one scheduling issue about which you should be aware. v6.1 GFS does not recognize "Overlapping Operations." If this is not an issue for your shop, I would encourage you to use it. With GFS used properly, it should reduce WIP 10-20%, improve your On Time Shipping to customers, and it will provide the ability to project customer ship dates. FYI: The Overlapping issue in GFS is fixed in v9.
> Monte Tomerlin
> www.Tomerlin-ERP.com
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@> wrote:
> >
> > As a rule: yes. But I never used v6 and don't know its foibles.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: mmstark_scc <michelle.stark@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Thu, February 10, 2011 2:05:53 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 6.1 Global finite scheduling
> >
> > ÂÂ
> > A question for anyone running Global Finite Scheduling (GFS) in 6.1 -- do you
> > run MRP to create unfirmed jobs, then GFS to finite schedule all the jobs and
> > then Generate Purchasing Suggestions to create purchasing suggestions based on
> > how the jobs were rescheduled during GFS? We are kind of confused on the exact
> > process.
> >
> >
> > Also, any problems that anyone has run into with GFS that would make us think
> > twice about using it?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Michelle Stark
> > Steel Craft Corp.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>