I never received the one-off fix I requested for 8.03.410 for that issue. We upgraded to Epicor 9 last fall and I had them close the call.
Sue
Sue
I’ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
> **[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> I�ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any
> rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
> **[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> I’ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any
> rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
I heard through the grapevine that it probably won’t be released. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news L
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:brye@...> brye@...
***ITAR NOTICE***
This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of this data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad, without an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be reproduced without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@... <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@... <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com> >wrote:
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:brye@...> brye@...
***ITAR NOTICE***
This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of this data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad, without an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be reproduced without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@... <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@... <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com> >wrote:
> **[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> I’ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any
> rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I had prepared myself for that. :-) Thanks.
From: Bethany Rye
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I heard through the grapevine that it probably won’t be released. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news L
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com> mailto:brye%40cignys.com
***ITAR NOTICE***
This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of this data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad, without an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be reproduced without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com> >wrote:
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
From: Bethany Rye
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I heard through the grapevine that it probably won’t be released. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news L
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com> mailto:brye%40cignys.com
***ITAR NOTICE***
This e-mail and/or the attached documents may contain technical data within the definition of the International Traffic in Arms regulations, and are subject to the export control laws of the US Government. Transfer of this data by any means to a foreign person, whether in the US or abroad, without an export license or other approval from the US Department of State, is prohibited. No portion of this e-mail or its attachment(s) may be reproduced without written consent of CIGNYS. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this document in error, please notify the sender and delete this e-mail and any attachments immediately.
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com> >wrote:
> **[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> I’ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any
> rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
------------------------------------
Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/. <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/>
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2411/4960 - Release Date: 04/26/12
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Vic,
Per minutes from EUG Leadership Council meeting on Feb 22, 8.03.410 was
targeted for release at the end of June 2012, and it will be the last
service pack for Vantage.
Regards,
Scott
*From:* vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
Of *Vic Drecchio
*Sent:* Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:29 PM
*To:* vantage@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I had prepared myself for that. :-) Thanks.
From: Bethany Rye
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I heard through the grapevine that it probably won�t be released. Sorry to
be the bearer of bad news L
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com> mailto:brye%40cignys.com
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%
40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com>
Per minutes from EUG Leadership Council meeting on Feb 22, 8.03.410 was
targeted for release at the end of June 2012, and it will be the last
service pack for Vantage.
Regards,
Scott
*From:* vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf
Of *Vic Drecchio
*Sent:* Thursday, April 26, 2012 12:29 PM
*To:* vantage@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I had prepared myself for that. :-) Thanks.
From: Bethany Rye
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 11:24 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] 8.03.410
I heard through the grapevine that it probably won�t be released. Sorry to
be the bearer of bad news L
Beth Rye
IT Director
CIGNYS
Email: <mailto:mailto:brye%40cignys.com> mailto:brye%40cignys.com
From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%
40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vic Drecchio
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:44 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
{sigh}
I know. I figure I'll be the last customer on 9.x and let you all work out
the kinks. See you at 9.45.710A
:-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Jose Gomez
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2012 10:37 AM
To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] 8.03.410
Vic I think you got the version wrong you are looking for 9.05 ;-)
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com <mailto:jose%40josecgomez.com>
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Vic Drecchio
<mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com <mailto:vic.drecchio%40swepcotube.com>
>wrote:[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> **
>
> I�ve asked my CAM and nobody seems to know...... anyone on here heard any
> rumors on when the .410 patch will finally be released?
>
On fairly reliable information, it will be out in Summer 2012.
Not sure if it is the last one for 8 though
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Not sure if it is the last one for 8 though
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Don't hold your breath....
March 2011, September 2011, December 2011, Unsure, June 2012, ....
Bruce Butler, IS Manager
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Heeder
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 6:14 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
On fairly reliable information, it will be out in Summer 2012.
Not sure if it is the last one for 8 though
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
March 2011, September 2011, December 2011, Unsure, June 2012, ....
Bruce Butler, IS Manager
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Heeder
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 6:14 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
On fairly reliable information, it will be out in Summer 2012.
Not sure if it is the last one for 8 though
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Its Broken ofcourse its epicor, that's step number 3 in their deployment
list
1. Review Tickets
2. Pretend to Fix some Issues
3. Make sure you break something new
4. Release.
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
list
1. Review Tickets
2. Pretend to Fix some Issues
3. Make sure you break something new
4. Release.
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Vic Drecchio
<vic.drecchio@...>wrote:
> **[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or
> concerns?
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
Sue
Sue
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
411??? hahahahahaha!!!
1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
411??? hahahahahaha!!!
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
>
> Sue
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
AWesome, thanks for the update~
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, snielsen28 <snielsen.hipco@...>wrote:
> **
>
>
> Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
>
> 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs
> which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse
> showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from
> jobs appear to be fixed!
> 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a
> one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with
> one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> fixed in 410.
> 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> still broken in 410.
> 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in
> 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
> 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than
> one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still
> broken in 410.
> 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need
> to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
> 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice
> payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
> 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from
> "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
> 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
> 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order
> (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than
> invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
>
> Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410
> release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
>
> 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
> >
> > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in
> 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in
> 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with
> shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs
> (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me
> that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why
> it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted
> for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411?
> I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know
> how things are going.
> >
> > Sue
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or
> concerns?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
You're welcome. Several of our one-offs have already been sent in with requests to retrofit to 410. I'm testing Epicor 9, but I have a lot of work to do before we can go there. I really hope to be on the latest version of Vantage to (hopefully!) eliminate a conversion step when it comes time to go to 9. But if the latest version of Vantage is more broken than what we're on now that won't happen. (More broken, is that bad English?!)
Sue
Sue
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jose Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> AWesome, thanks for the update~
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:15 AM, snielsen28 <snielsen.hipco@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
> >
> > 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs
> > which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse
> > showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> > 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from
> > jobs appear to be fixed!
> > 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a
> > one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> > 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with
> > one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> > 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> > fixed in 410.
> > 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> > still broken in 410.
> > 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in
> > 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
> > 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than
> > one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still
> > broken in 410.
> > 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need
> > to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is
> > reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
> > 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice
> > payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
> > 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from
> > "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
> > 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
> > 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order
> > (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> > 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than
> > invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> >
> > Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410
> > release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
> >
> > 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in
> > 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in
> > 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with
> > shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs
> > (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me
> > that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why
> > it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted
> > for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411?
> > I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know
> > how things are going.
> > >
> > > Sue
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or
> > concerns?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Another update on 8.03.410...
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
>
> 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
Update...SCR 100127 has been created and is targeted for 8.03.411. I have been notified that a one-off fix for 8.03.410 has been requested.
> 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
> 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...I have received a one-off fix for this.
> 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...further testing showed that hidden columns momentarily appear when the dashboard is refreshing, however once all grids have refreshed, the hidden columns behave themselves and stay hidden.
> 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
> 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...A one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested.
> 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
> 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410.
> 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
> 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
> 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
> 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
> 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...a one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested for this.
> 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410 for this.
Anyone else have any testing results from 8.03.410? I'm hoping I get the last 3 one-off fixes and that no additional "big bugs" show up in 8.03.410. It would make testing and eventually converting to Epicor 9 much easier if my production db was the same version as the conversion jump-off point! I've been told the data upgrade utility included with 9.05.700 for 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 also works with 8.03.410 to 9.05.700. From what I understand, some behind-the-scenes work has been done in 8.03.410 to improve the upgrade to Epicor 9. That could be why it took so long to release 8.03.410. The data upgrade utility worked smoothly from 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 although it took longer than the other conversions I tested. I never could get the original data upgrade utility to work and the long route thru 9.04 had some errors and bad instructions to struggle with (searching the group got me thru that!). Next step will be running the data upgrade utility from 8.03.410 to Epicor 9.05.700 and seeing how that compares. I received some help from an Epicor tech to get my database settings optimized to get the most from the old server I'm using for converting and testing Epicor 9 that may help the time factor. Also, hopefully making the jump from 410 instead of 409C also helps.
Sue
>
> Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
>
> 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
> >
> > Sue
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
Sue,
I'm helping out another company in their upgrade from 8.03.305K all the way up to 9.05.700C. They are on Progress, and the database is about 4G.
The first pass went pretty smoothly. Using the Data Upgrade Utility, it took about half a day to go to 410, about a full day to get to the DUU 9.04 level, and then another full day to get up to 9.05.700C. No enormous errors that I know of, and we're going to do another pass next week. I've recommended we upgrade their live system to the 410 level, but that may not be an option (too many of their reports are ODBC and need to be re-written for every new version of Progress).
I only found a few errors in the instructions in the DUU manual, and Epicor tech support told me about a big documentation error going from the 9.04 level to 9.05... I don't have my notes here but I can put it up when I get back there late next week.
Ernie Lowell
Diba INdustries
I'm helping out another company in their upgrade from 8.03.305K all the way up to 9.05.700C. They are on Progress, and the database is about 4G.
The first pass went pretty smoothly. Using the Data Upgrade Utility, it took about half a day to go to 410, about a full day to get to the DUU 9.04 level, and then another full day to get up to 9.05.700C. No enormous errors that I know of, and we're going to do another pass next week. I've recommended we upgrade their live system to the 410 level, but that may not be an option (too many of their reports are ODBC and need to be re-written for every new version of Progress).
I only found a few errors in the instructions in the DUU manual, and Epicor tech support told me about a big documentation error going from the 9.04 level to 9.05... I don't have my notes here but I can put it up when I get back there late next week.
Ernie Lowell
Diba INdustries
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> Another update on 8.03.410...
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> >
> > Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
> >
> > 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> Update...SCR 100127 has been created and is targeted for 8.03.411. I have been notified that a one-off fix for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
>
> > 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I have received a one-off fix for this.
>
> > 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...further testing showed that hidden columns momentarily appear when the dashboard is refreshing, however once all grids have refreshed, the hidden columns behave themselves and stay hidden.
>
>
> > 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
>
> > 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...A one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
>
> > 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410.
>
> > 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
>
> > 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
>
> > 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...a one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested for this.
>
> > 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410 for this.
>
> Anyone else have any testing results from 8.03.410? I'm hoping I get the last 3 one-off fixes and that no additional "big bugs" show up in 8.03.410. It would make testing and eventually converting to Epicor 9 much easier if my production db was the same version as the conversion jump-off point! I've been told the data upgrade utility included with 9.05.700 for 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 also works with 8.03.410 to 9.05.700. From what I understand, some behind-the-scenes work has been done in 8.03.410 to improve the upgrade to Epicor 9. That could be why it took so long to release 8.03.410. The data upgrade utility worked smoothly from 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 although it took longer than the other conversions I tested. I never could get the original data upgrade utility to work and the long route thru 9.04 had some errors and bad instructions to struggle with (searching the group got me thru that!). Next step will be running the data upgrade utility from 8.03.410 to Epicor 9.05.700 and seeing how that compares. I received some help from an Epicor tech to get my database settings optimized to get the most from the old server I'm using for converting and testing Epicor 9 that may help the time factor. Also, hopefully making the jump from 410 instead of 409C also helps.
>
> Sue
>
> >
> > Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
> >
> > 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
> > >
> > > Sue
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
saw 409 and didn't see anything it would fix for us. didn't know there was a 410. currently on 408B progress and doing a test server upgrade to 9.05.. got to the point of installing 9.04 and when i run admin for the first conversion i get an error on the gl books cv\cvgl007 and Epicor says there is some sort of patch I need, been waiting 2 weeks.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth" <gracefulthreads@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:46:41 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
Â
Sue,
I'm helping out another company in their upgrade from 8.03.305K all the way up to 9.05.700C. They are on Progress, and the database is about 4G.
The first pass went pretty smoothly. Using the Data Upgrade Utility, it took about half a day to go to 410, about a full day to get to the DUU 9.04 level, and then another full day to get up to 9.05.700C. No enormous errors that I know of, and we're going to do another pass next week. I've recommended we upgrade their live system to the 410 level, but that may not be an option (too many of their reports are ODBC and need to be re-written for every new version of Progress).
I only found a few errors in the instructions in the DUU manual, and Epicor tech support told me about a big documentation error going from the 9.04 level to 9.05... I don't have my notes here but I can put it up when I get back there late next week.
Ernie Lowell
Diba INdustries
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> Another update on 8.03.410...
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> >
> > Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
> >
> > 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> Update...SCR 100127 has been created and is targeted for 8.03.411. I have been notified that a one-off fix for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
>
> > 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I have received a one-off fix for this.
>
> > 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...further testing showed that hidden columns momentarily appear when the dashboard is refreshing, however once all grids have refreshed, the hidden columns behave themselves and stay hidden.
>
>
> > 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
>
> > 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...A one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
>
> > 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410.
>
> > 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
>
> > 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
>
> > 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...a one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested for this.
>
> > 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410 for this.
>
> Anyone else have any testing results from 8.03.410? I'm hoping I get the last 3 one-off fixes and that no additional "big bugs" show up in 8.03.410. It would make testing and eventually converting to Epicor 9 much easier if my production db was the same version as the conversion jump-off point! I've been told the data upgrade utility included with 9.05.700 for 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 also works with 8.03.410 to 9.05.700. From what I understand, some behind-the-scenes work has been done in 8.03.410 to improve the upgrade to Epicor 9. That could be why it took so long to release 8.03.410. The data upgrade utility worked smoothly from 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 although it took longer than the other conversions I tested. I never could get the original data upgrade utility to work and the long route thru 9.04 had some errors and bad instructions to struggle with (searching the group got me thru that!). Next step will be running the data upgrade utility from 8.03.410 to Epicor 9.05.700 and seeing how that compares. I received some help from an Epicor tech to get my database settings optimized to get the most from the old server I'm using for converting and testing Epicor 9 that may help the time factor. Also, hopefully making the jump from 410 instead of 409C also helps.
>
> Sue
>
> >
> > Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
> >
> > 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
> > >
> > > Sue
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Don't install 9.04 use the data upgrade too to go strauight to 9.5
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: jdaniel1127@...
Sender: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:38:46
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
saw 409 and didn't see anything it would fix for us. didn't know there was a 410. currently on 408B progress and doing a test server upgrade to 9.05.. got to the point of installing 9.04 and when i run admin for the first conversion i get an error on the gl books cv\cvgl007 and Epicor says there is some sort of patch I need, been waiting 2 weeks.....
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: jdaniel1127@...
Sender: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:38:46
To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Reply-To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
saw 409 and didn't see anything it would fix for us. didn't know there was a 410. currently on 408B progress and doing a test server upgrade to 9.05.. got to the point of installing 9.04 and when i run admin for the first conversion i get an error on the gl books cv\cvgl007 and Epicor says there is some sort of patch I need, been waiting 2 weeks.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth" <gracefulthreads@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:46:41 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
Â
Sue,
I'm helping out another company in their upgrade from 8.03.305K all the way up to 9.05.700C. They are on Progress, and the database is about 4G.
The first pass went pretty smoothly. Using the Data Upgrade Utility, it took about half a day to go to 410, about a full day to get to the DUU 9.04 level, and then another full day to get up to 9.05.700C. No enormous errors that I know of, and we're going to do another pass next week. I've recommended we upgrade their live system to the 410 level, but that may not be an option (too many of their reports are ODBC and need to be re-written for every new version of Progress).
I only found a few errors in the instructions in the DUU manual, and Epicor tech support told me about a big documentation error going from the 9.04 level to 9.05... I don't have my notes here but I can put it up when I get back there late next week.
Ernie Lowell
Diba INdustries
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> Another update on 8.03.410...
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> >
> > Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
> >
> > 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> Update...SCR 100127 has been created and is targeted for 8.03.411. I have been notified that a one-off fix for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
>
> > 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I have received a one-off fix for this.
>
> > 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...further testing showed that hidden columns momentarily appear when the dashboard is refreshing, however once all grids have refreshed, the hidden columns behave themselves and stay hidden.
>
>
> > 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
>
> > 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...A one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
>
> > 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410.
>
> > 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
>
> > 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
>
> > 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...a one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested for this.
>
> > 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410 for this.
>
> Anyone else have any testing results from 8.03.410? I'm hoping I get the last 3 one-off fixes and that no additional "big bugs" show up in 8.03.410. It would make testing and eventually converting to Epicor 9 much easier if my production db was the same version as the conversion jump-off point! I've been told the data upgrade utility included with 9.05.700 for 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 also works with 8.03.410 to 9.05.700. From what I understand, some behind-the-scenes work has been done in 8.03.410 to improve the upgrade to Epicor 9. That could be why it took so long to release 8.03.410. The data upgrade utility worked smoothly from 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 although it took longer than the other conversions I tested. I never could get the original data upgrade utility to work and the long route thru 9.04 had some errors and bad instructions to struggle with (searching the group got me thru that!). Next step will be running the data upgrade utility from 8.03.410 to Epicor 9.05.700 and seeing how that compares. I received some help from an Epicor tech to get my database settings optimized to get the most from the old server I'm using for converting and testing Epicor 9 that may help the time factor. Also, hopefully making the jump from 410 instead of 409C also helps.
>
> Sue
>
> >
> > Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
> >
> > 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
> > >
> > > Sue
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
so i can go from 8.03.408b straight to 9.05? have 408b on server 2003. when do i need to upgrade to server 2008, before i upgrade to 9.05?
----- Original Message -----
From: jose@...
To: "Vantage" <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:45:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
Â
Don't install 9.04 use the data upgrade too to go strauight to 9.5
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
-----Original Message-----
From: jdaniel1127@...
Sender: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 23:38:46
To: < vantage@yahoogroups.com >
Reply-To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
saw 409 and didn't see anything it would fix for us. didn't know there was a 410. currently on 408B progress and doing a test server upgrade to 9.05.. got to the point of installing 9.04 and when i run admin for the first conversion i get an error on the gl books cv\cvgl007 and Epicor says there is some sort of patch I need, been waiting 2 weeks.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "Elizabeth" < gracefulthreads@... >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2012 7:46:41 AM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 8.03.410
Â
Sue,
I'm helping out another company in their upgrade from 8.03.305K all the way up to 9.05.700C. They are on Progress, and the database is about 4G.
The first pass went pretty smoothly. Using the Data Upgrade Utility, it took about half a day to go to 410, about a full day to get to the DUU 9.04 level, and then another full day to get up to 9.05.700C. No enormous errors that I know of, and we're going to do another pass next week. I've recommended we upgrade their live system to the 410 level, but that may not be an option (too many of their reports are ODBC and need to be re-written for every new version of Progress).
I only found a few errors in the instructions in the DUU manual, and Epicor tech support told me about a big documentation error going from the 9.04 level to 9.05... I don't have my notes here but I can put it up when I get back there late next week.
Ernie Lowell
Diba INdustries
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@...> wrote:
>
> Another update on 8.03.410...
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> >
> > Update for anyone interested in the 8.03.410 service pack...
> >
> > 1. Saving an RMA receipt produces an unexpected error, see appserver logs which says a valid warehouse is required (yes there is a valid warehouse showing in the receipt); service call placed last Friday, no answer yet.
> Update...SCR 100127 has been created and is targeted for 8.03.411. I have been notified that a one-off fix for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 2. Multiple issues with partial shipments and multiple packing slips from jobs appear to be fixed!
>
> > 3. Unknown GL when processing sales kits thru counter sales (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I have received a one-off fix for this.
>
> > 4. Hidden columns being displayed in multi-company dashboards (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...further testing showed that hidden columns momentarily appear when the dashboard is refreshing, however once all grids have refreshed, the hidden columns behave themselves and stay hidden.
>
>
> > 5. Can't post negative AP misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is fixed in 410.
>
> > 6. Can't post negative AR misc charges (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...A one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested.
>
> > 7. Labor entry grid can't handle rapid posting (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410, although I haven't tested that.
>
> > 8. Multi-company dashboard don't bring up 2nd company info if more than one query w/same table in dashboard (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410.
>
> > 9. "Value does not match mask" errors in customer tracker causing a need to run conversion 9527 every week or so (fixed with one-off in 409A) is reported to be fixed in 410 (no problems when testing 410).
>
> > 10. Cash receipts entry allows out of balance to be posted if an invoice payment with misc amt is posted is fixed in 410.
>
> > 11. Part Advisor doesn't show an order line as ordered if it's added from "new line from quote" option in order entry has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 12. Master Production Schedule that wouldn't run has been fixed in 410.
>
> > 13. Sales order misc charges being multiplied by number of lines in order (fixed with one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...a one-off for 8.03.410 has been requested for this.
>
> > 14. Finance charges being calculated on invoice amounts rather than invoice balances (fixed with a one-off in 409A) is still broken in 410.
> Update...I received a one-off for 8.03.410 for this.
>
> Anyone else have any testing results from 8.03.410? I'm hoping I get the last 3 one-off fixes and that no additional "big bugs" show up in 8.03.410. It would make testing and eventually converting to Epicor 9 much easier if my production db was the same version as the conversion jump-off point! I've been told the data upgrade utility included with 9.05.700 for 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 also works with 8.03.410 to 9.05.700. From what I understand, some behind-the-scenes work has been done in 8.03.410 to improve the upgrade to Epicor 9. That could be why it took so long to release 8.03.410. The data upgrade utility worked smoothly from 8.03.409C to 9.05.700 although it took longer than the other conversions I tested. I never could get the original data upgrade utility to work and the long route thru 9.04 had some errors and bad instructions to struggle with (searching the group got me thru that!). Next step will be running the data upgrade utility from 8.03.410 to Epicor 9.05.700 and seeing how that compares. I received some help from an Epicor tech to get my database settings optimized to get the most from the old server I'm using for converting and testing Epicor 9 that may help the time factor. Also, hopefully making the jump from 410 instead of 409C also helps.
>
> Sue
>
> >
> > Sure wish more of our one-off fixes would have been included with the 410 release instead of being rescheduled for 411.
> >
> > 411??? hahahahahaha!!!
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , "snielsen28" <snielsen.hipco@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm testing it now. So far...4 of our SCRs fixed with 1-off fixes in 409A are broken in 410, 1 of our SCRs with 1-off fix in 409A is fixed in 410, 1 other SCR fixed in 410. I haven't done any thorough testing with shipping which 410 claims to have fixed. Just ran into an error with RMAs (can't do an RMA receipt, get unexpected error-see applogs, which tells me that a valid warehouse is required, HUH?). At this point I'm not sure why it took over 2 years for 410 to be released! Many calls that were targeted for 410 are now targeted for 411...does anyone think they'll ever be a 411? I'll try to post another update within the next few days and let you know how things are going.
> > >
> > > Sue
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com , Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone applied it yet? I just saw it's available... Any issues or concerns?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]