9.05.601 Blank Title 94038

Yahoo Archive
1
New microsft china language processing keyword based upon the multilingual, technical shorthand no coomonly known as 'texting'.

Guessing it's about 1 yr max from commercial applicatioñ(starting in China) in no more inoccuous way than spell check has been glued on to hundreds of apps.

The power here is that it breaks the language barrier on a massive scale yet is subtle enough ti convey emotion (the capatalized WTF) convey's its urgency & a look up routine revealing that WTF is an desperate 'oath' further reveals things in the message (as context in shorthand messaging MUST play be clear rules and also be very explicit as to their heirarchial meaning).

Just kidding. (Or am I?!? Hey?! WTf

--- Original Message ---
From:<sysadmin@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 5:42 pm
To:<vantage@yahoogroups.com>
Subj:RE: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

WTF? What's that, some kind of new protocol? ;-)





_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jen
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 4:29 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601



Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It
keeps timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it
keeps bombing.

Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.

Yes, I'll say it...WTF?

Jennifer






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Has anyone gone to .601?

We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet to be discovered.

So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works. It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are wrong or incomplete.

Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?

Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?

Thanks
3
Reading this, I thought I wrote this and did not rememberÂ…
We are in the exact place you are, go-live from 803 planned for Oct-8/11 and have been testing extensively 905.600C
We too have a long list of open items and show stoppers and found fixes for many of our issues in the 601 write-up
I spent all weekend trying to upgrade to 601 and spent all Monday/Tuesday with their support to identify the issues
Current issue is with SQL non-UniCode version
You need the 32-bit admin console to run on a `workstation' and they `forgot' to update the 32-bit console programs in the SP package.
If you are in my situation, check the /32/Clientserver directory and the dates of the admin menus – they should be September not April or what ever version you have now.
I have asked development to expedite this and have not heard back yet
If you have a solution for this, please post so all of us know about this

Thanks
Motty


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan" <bmseekins@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet to be discovered.
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works. It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are wrong or incomplete.
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
4
Bryan,

We are currently on 9.05.600c and I am testing 601. The fix list is indeed
extensive but has resolved some significant bugs for us. I found one issue with
the AR Invoice which once associated BPMs as disabled will resolve it. Also,
for some reason the job number format has once again changed i.e. jobs created
from within Sales Order now have leading zeros, this was not the case in 600c.

I installed 601 with the 32bit version and had no problems, Â however my
production environement calls for the 64bit installation which I am hoping to do
soon. What issue did you encounter with this install? Also, did it install
temporary files on your C drive? I had issues with 9s installer in that it
checked the C drive for available space despite the actual installation was
being made to another drive, and since suffcient space was not available it
refused to install until free space was created. I hope this is not this case
.....

PaulÂ




________________________________
From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601

Â
Has anyone gone to .601?

We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
(bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet
to be discovered.


So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are
wrong or incomplete.


Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?

Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?

Thanks







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
5
I should add that we are on progress....


________________________________
From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601

Â
Has anyone gone to .601?

We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
(bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet
to be discovered.


So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are
wrong or incomplete.


Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?

Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?

Thanks







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
6
Motty - We are in the exact same spot. We are waiting to hear back from support. We are told we will receive something this afternoon. I will call them by 3:00 if we don't.



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mseal" <mseal@...> wrote:
>
> Reading this, I thought I wrote this and did not rememberÂ…
> We are in the exact place you are, go-live from 803 planned for Oct-8/11 and have been testing extensively 905.600C
> We too have a long list of open items and show stoppers and found fixes for many of our issues in the 601 write-up
> I spent all weekend trying to upgrade to 601 and spent all Monday/Tuesday with their support to identify the issues
> Current issue is with SQL non-UniCode version
> You need the 32-bit admin console to run on a `workstation' and they `forgot' to update the 32-bit console programs in the SP package.
> If you are in my situation, check the /32/Clientserver directory and the dates of the admin menus – they should be September not April or what ever version you have now.
> I have asked development to expedite this and have not heard back yet
> If you have a solution for this, please post so all of us know about this
>
> Thanks
> Motty
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan" <bmseekins@> wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet to be discovered.
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works. It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are wrong or incomplete.
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>
7
Hi Paul - We are on SQL. It is encouraging to hear many of your issues have been resolved and you haven't hit any new major ones.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
> Bryan,
>
> We are currently on 9.05.600c and I am testing 601. The fix list is indeed
> extensive but has resolved some significant bugs for us. I found one issue with
> the AR Invoice which once associated BPMs as disabled will resolve it. Also,
> for some reason the job number format has once again changed i.e. jobs created
> from within Sales Order now have leading zeros, this was not the case in 600c.
>
> I installed 601 with the 32bit version and had no problems,  however my
> production environement calls for the 64bit installation which I am hoping to do
> soon. What issue did you encounter with this install? Also, did it install
> temporary files on your C drive? I had issues with 9s installer in that it
> checked the C drive for available space despite the actual installation was
> being made to another drive, and since suffcient space was not available it
> refused to install until free space was created. I hope this is not this case
> .....
>
> PaulÂÂ
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
> be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
> list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet
> to be discovered.
>
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are
> wrong or incomplete.
>
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
8
Bryan,

I just did hit a major issue... I am doing the install a second time on another
test server which has similar specs i.e. C drive has 3GB, D drive 125GB and
install indicates that i don't have suffcient hard drive space even before I
select which drive to install. Apparently, during the verification process
files are transfered to my C drive by default and because my drive is small all
cannot fit. I am currently on hold with EPicor to hear what they will say...If
I don't get this resolved I am stuck on 600c for life (lolol) since my
production server has a small allocation for the C drive as well... We all seem
to have lots of fun with Epicor and our beloved product....


Â

________________________________
From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 2:11:42 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Â
Hi Paul - We are on SQL. It is encouraging to hear many of your issues have been
resolved and you haven't hit any new major ones.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
> Bryan,
>
> We are currently on 9.05.600c and I am testing 601. The fix list is indeed
> extensive but has resolved some significant bugs for us. I found one issue
>with
>
> the AR Invoice which once associated BPMs as disabled will resolve it. Also,
>
> for some reason the job number format has once again changed i.e. jobs created

> from within Sales Order now have leading zeros, this was not the case in 600c.
>
> I installed 601 with the 32bit version and had no problems,  however my
> production environement calls for the 64bit installation which I am hoping to
>do
>
> soon. What issue did you encounter with this install? Also, did it install

> temporary files on your C drive? I had issues with 9s installer in that it
> checked the C drive for available space despite the actual installation was
> being made to another drive, and since suffcient space was not available it
> refused to install until free space was created. I hope this is not this case
>
> .....
>
> PaulÂÂ
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to

> be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The

> list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
>
> depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
>
> nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones
>yet
>
> to be discovered.
>
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
>
> It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions
>are
>
> wrong or incomplete.
>
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
9
Just got off the phone with support and data conversion is running.
issue was in the PROPATH set in the .ini file that your Data Admin Tools are using (check the path) - once corrected it started to run. here is the line we corrected:
PROPATH=.,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\Clientserver,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\Clientserver,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\Server,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\Server,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\32\Custom,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\Custom,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\BPMExec\LiveBPM,C:\Program Files\Epicor Software\Epicor905\,C:\program files\epicor\oe102a\gui,C:\program files\epicor\oe102a\,C:\program files\epicor\oe102a\bin


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan" <bmseekins@...> wrote:
>
> Motty - We are in the exact same spot. We are waiting to hear back from support. We are told we will receive something this afternoon. I will call them by 3:00 if we don't.
>
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mseal" <mseal@> wrote:
> >
> > Reading this, I thought I wrote this and did not rememberÂ…
> > We are in the exact place you are, go-live from 803 planned for Oct-8/11 and have been testing extensively 905.600C
> > We too have a long list of open items and show stoppers and found fixes for many of our issues in the 601 write-up
> > I spent all weekend trying to upgrade to 601 and spent all Monday/Tuesday with their support to identify the issues
> > Current issue is with SQL non-UniCode version
> > You need the 32-bit admin console to run on a `workstation' and they `forgot' to update the 32-bit console programs in the SP package.
> > If you are in my situation, check the /32/Clientserver directory and the dates of the admin menus – they should be September not April or what ever version you have now.
> > I have asked development to expedite this and have not heard back yet
> > If you have a solution for this, please post so all of us know about this
> >
> > Thanks
> > Motty
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Bryan" <bmseekins@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Has anyone gone to .601?
> > >
> > > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet to be discovered.
> > >
> > > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works. It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are wrong or incomplete.
> > >
> > > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> > >
> > > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> >
>
10
Forgive me, but 3GB and 125 GB respectively sounds pretty light for a server capable of E9. 3GB isn't even enough for a respectable pagefile.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Bryan,
>
> I just did hit a major issue... I am doing the install a second time on another
> test server which has similar specs i.e. C drive has 3GB, D drive 125GB and
> install indicates that i don't have suffcient hard drive space even before I
> select which drive to install. Apparently, during the verification process
> files are transfered to my C drive by default and because my drive is small all
> cannot fit. I am currently on hold with EPicor to hear what they will say...If
> I don't get this resolved I am stuck on 600c for life (lolol) since my
> production server has a small allocation for the C drive as well... We all seem
> to have lots of fun with Epicor and our beloved product....
>
11
its really a secondary server that I am using to test the install.Â




________________________________
From: k99ja04 <jallmond@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 6:22:24 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Â
Forgive me, but 3GB and 125 GB respectively sounds pretty light for a server
capable of E9. 3GB isn't even enough for a respectable pagefile.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> Bryan,
>
> I just did hit a major issue... I am doing the install a second time on another
>
> test server which has similar specs i.e. C drive has 3GB, D drive 125GB and
> install indicates that i don't have suffcient hard drive space even before I
> select which drive to install. Apparently, during the verification process
> files are transfered to my C drive by default and because my drive is small all
>
> cannot fit. I am currently on hold with EPicor to hear what they will
>say...If
>
> I don't get this resolved I am stuck on 600c for life (lolol) since my
> production server has a small allocation for the C drive as well... We all
>seem
>
> to have lots of fun with Epicor and our beloved product....
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
12
Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps bombing.

Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.

Yes, I'll say it...WTF?

Jennifer

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> I should add that we are on progress....
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
> be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
> list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet
> to be discovered.
>
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are
> wrong or incomplete.
>
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
13
Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)

Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!

(Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know! /:o... Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!

--- Original Message ---
From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps bombing.

Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.

Yes, I'll say it...WTF?

Jennifer

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> I should add that we are on progress....
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
> be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
> list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones yet
> to be discovered.
>
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions are
> wrong or incomplete.
>
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
14
They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.




________________________________
From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Â
Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)

Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!

(Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know! /:o...
Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!


--- Original Message ---
From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
bombing.

Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.

Yes, I'll say it...WTF?

Jennifer

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> I should add that we are on progress....
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bryan <bmseekins@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Has anyone gone to .601?
>
> We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to

> be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The

> list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
>
> depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
>
> nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones
>yet
>
> to be discovered.
>
>
> So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
>
> It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions
>are
>
> wrong or incomplete.
>
>
> Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
>
> Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
15
Worked for me after 10th or 11th try

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...> wrote:
>
> They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)
>
> Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!
>
> (Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know! /:o...
> Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
> Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
> To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
> timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
> bombing.
>
> Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.
>
> Yes, I'll say it...WTF?
>
> Jennifer
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I should add that we are on progress....
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan <bmseekins@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
> >
> > ÂÂÂ
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> > planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> > (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
>
> > be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
>
> > list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> >
> > depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> >
> > nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones
> >yet
> >
> > to be discovered.
> >
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> > for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> > unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> >
> > It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions
> >are
> >
> > wrong or incomplete.
> >
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
16
Yes, we called them. They said there is something wrong with the server and/or ISP. Which is it?

Allegedly, they will be sending an email out in the next hour.

Jen
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...> wrote:
>
> They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)
>
> Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!
>
> (Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know! /:o...
> Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
> Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
> To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
> timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
> bombing.
>
> Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.
>
> Yes, I'll say it...WTF?
>
> Jennifer
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I should add that we are on progress....
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan <bmseekins@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
> >
> > ÂÂÂ
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> > planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> > (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
>
> > be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
>
> > list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> >
> > depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> >
> > nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones
> >yet
> >
> > to be discovered.
> >
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> > for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> > unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> >
> > It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions
> >are
> >
> > wrong or incomplete.
> >
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
17
All kidding aside, I'd wait (and stew!) and in EXACTLY 55 minutes call and ask if it's been resolved (before teasing yourself by starting the download - only to have it possibly bomb).

Assuming you're E Coast and a long week is rapidly getting longer, anyway you can skedaddle and do this remotely from home?

(Does this HAVE to happen tonight? Sounds like the Epicor Gods are sending a message: 'Do it Monday'....)

They could spend all night going back and forth w/ their ISP saying their Bob's Bargain Basement server is 'working as designed' and the ISP is the problem.

go home!
--- Original Message ---
From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 5:03 pm
To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601


Yes, we called them. They said there is something wrong with the server and/or ISP. Which is it?

Allegedly, they will be sending an email out in the next hour.

Jen
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...> wrote:
>
> They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> ÂÂ
> Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)
>
> Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!
>
> (Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know! /:o...
> Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
> Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
> To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
> timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
> bombing.
>
> Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.
>
> Yes, I'll say it...WTF?
>
> Jennifer
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I should add that we are on progress....
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan <bmseekins@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
> >
> > ÁÂÂ
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> > planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> > (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed to
>
> > be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are. The
>
> > list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or horrifying
> >
> > depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I am
> >
> > nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones
> >yet
> >
> > to be discovered.
> >
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
> > for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> > unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process works.
> >
> > It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions
> >are
> >
> > wrong or incomplete.
> >
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message h
18
WTF? What's that, some kind of new protocol? ;-)





_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jen
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 4:29 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601



Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It
keeps timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it
keeps bombing.

Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.

Yes, I'll say it...WTF?

Jennifer






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
19
If you are waiting on 601 dont hurry as 601A was just released today and from
what I have heard from development it is going to be needed anyway




________________________________
From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 5:34:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Â
All kidding aside, I'd wait (and stew!) and in EXACTLY 55 minutes call and ask
if it's been resolved (before teasing yourself by starting the download - only
to have it possibly bomb).

Assuming you're E Coast and a long week is rapidly getting longer, anyway you
can skedaddle and do this remotely from home?

(Does this HAVE to happen tonight? Sounds like the Epicor Gods are sending a
message: 'Do it Monday'....)

They could spend all night going back and forth w/ their ISP saying their Bob's
Bargain Basement server is 'working as designed' and the ISP is the problem.

go home!
--- Original Message ---
From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 5:03 pm
To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Yes, we called them. They said there is something wrong with the server and/or
ISP. Which is it?

Allegedly, they will be sending an email out in the next hour.

Jen
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...> wrote:
>
> They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Â
> Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)
>
> Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!
>
> (Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know!
>/:o...
>
> Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!
>
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
> Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
> To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
> timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
> bombing.
>
> Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.
>
> Yes, I'll say it...WTF?
>
> Jennifer
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I should add that we are on progress....
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan <bmseekins@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
> >
> > ÁÂ
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> > planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> > (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed
>to
>
>
> > be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are.
>The
>
>
> > list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or
>horrifying
>
> >
> > depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I
>am
>
> >
> > nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones

> >yet
> >
> > to be discovered.
> >
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
>
> > for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> > unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process
>works.
>
> >
> > It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions

> >are
> >
> > wrong or incomplete.
> >
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message h







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
20
601A? I don't even see that up there for download yet...

I did manage to get a good copy of 601-32P and 601-64P downloaded last week though, but they have been a pain to work with so far... not a fan of the new installer versus the old basic zip package...

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark Wagner
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 6:20 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

If you are waiting on 601 dont hurry as 601A was just released today and from what I have heard from development it is going to be needed anyway




________________________________
From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 5:34:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601


All kidding aside, I'd wait (and stew!) and in EXACTLY 55 minutes call and ask
if it's been resolved (before teasing yourself by starting the download - only
to have it possibly bomb).

Assuming you're E Coast and a long week is rapidly getting longer, anyway you
can skedaddle and do this remotely from home?

(Does this HAVE to happen tonight? Sounds like the Epicor Gods are sending a
message: 'Do it Monday'....)

They could spend all night going back and forth w/ their ISP saying their Bob's
Bargain Basement server is 'working as designed' and the ISP is the problem.

go home!
--- Original Message ---
From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
Sent:Fri 10/1/10 5:03 pm
To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601

Yes, we called them. They said there is something wrong with the server and/or
ISP. Which is it?

Allegedly, they will be sending an email out in the next hour.

Jen
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Steven Gotschall <sgotschall@...> wrote:
>
> They'll tell you that downloading it will cause you undo distress.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: "robertb_versa@..." <robertb_versa@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Fri, October 1, 2010 4:46:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
>
> Call em yet? (Could be something on their end - Planned or random annoyance.)
>
> Cash in some of those Epicor Maintenance/Support $s!
>
> (Unlikely they'l be able to say'working as designed' - but ya never know!
>/:o...
>
> Somehow they could possibly convince themselves this is all somehow your fault!
>
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> From:"Jen" <jmesiano@...>
> Sent:Fri 10/1/10 4:28 pm
> To:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subj:[Vantage] Re: 9.05.601
>
> Has anyone been successful in downloading the complete .601 package? It keeps
> timing out on us. We tried both the website and the FTP site but it keeps
> bombing.
>
> Also, the partial one downloaded but it is corrupt.
>
> Yes, I'll say it...WTF?
>
> Jennifer
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Paul L Bennett <paullbennett@> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > I should add that we are on progress....
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Bryan <bmseekins@>
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 1:18:25 PM
> > Subject: [Vantage] 9.05.601
> >
> > Á
> > Has anyone gone to .601?
> >
> > We have been in the process of going from 8.03 to 9.05. We had originally
> > planned to convert in early September. In our testing we found a few issues
> > (bugs) that we considered show stoppers in 9.05.600b. The bugs are supposed
>to
>
>
> > be fixed in .601 and in reading the release notes, it looks like they are.
>The
>
>
> > list of fixes in .601 covers about 60 pages. Which is either good or
>horrifying
>
> >
> > depending on how you look at it. We need to get this upgrade completed and I
>am
>
> >
> > nervous that while our .600b bugs were fixed, there are a number of new ones

> >yet
> >
> > to be discovered.
> >
> >
> > So far we have been unable to install .601 due to problems with the installer
>
> > for 64 bit environments. We are working with support of course, but it is
> > unsettling that Epicor can't put out a release where the install process
>works.
>
> >
> > It seems like every time we try to install anything the install instructions

> >are
> >
> > wrong or incomplete.
> >
> >
> > Has anyone been installed .601? If so, did you find anything noteworthy?
> >
> > Is it me, or does Epicor support seem to be getting worse?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message h







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links