Could you put logic a little upstream that changes a yes value to true? That way if it stays yes you are covered and if it goes back to true you are still covered and never have to change the original code per se?
Brenda
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jennifer
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:43 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: ABL - Checkbox value "yes" instead of True
I could do that - but supposedly this was working a few months ago with "true" (before my time here). I'm worried if I change the method somehow the value will get set back to true and I'll still be looking for "yes".
The condition is on ttEcoMtl.checkbox01 -- would you know any reason why its value would go from logical true/false to logical yes/no?
Brenda
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jennifer
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 2:43 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: ABL - Checkbox value "yes" instead of True
I could do that - but supposedly this was working a few months ago with "true" (before my time here). I'm worried if I change the method somehow the value will get set back to true and I'll still be looking for "yes".
The condition is on ttEcoMtl.checkbox01 -- would you know any reason why its value would go from logical true/false to logical yes/no?
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Jose Gomez <jose@...<mailto:jose@...>> wrote:
>
> Use and advanced Condition (click the Advanced Button) and do the Check IN
> 4GL
>
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]