Accounting Issues in 9.05.701

Yahoo Archive
1
I don't know if it's universal, but I've had at least 3 upgrades where it
deleted all the custom report styles. Luckily it leaves the RDD and RPT
intact, so it's pretty easy to recreate them. Still a pain though.

*John Driggers*
**
*Chief Data Wrangler*
*
*
*I have an Epicor blog <http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is that?*
*
*:: 904.404.9233
:: waffqle@...
:: http://www.usdoingstuff.com <http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>

*

*


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:21 PM, s1mhall <s1mhall@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> John,
> Can you give more detail about the report style issue, or is there another
> thread on this?
>
> Cheers
> Simon Hall
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, John Driggers wrote:
> >
> > If I recall correctly, the issue with report styles is the only major
> > problem I've run into so far. I haven't seen any new accounting issues
> yet.
> >
> > *John Driggers*
> > **
> > *Chief Data Wrangler*
> > *
> > *
> > *I have an Epicor blog http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is that?*
> > *
> > *:: 904.404.9233
> > :: waffqle@...
> > :: http://www.usdoingstuff.com http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>
> >
> > *
> >
> > *
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Manasa Reddy wrote:
> >
> > > **
>
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone found any accounting gotcha's in 701?
> > >
> > > If so would you be willing to share your issues? We are FIFO, but we
> are
> > > still interested in anything that is happening!
> > >
> > > We are using VMware and we also noticed issues with the crystal
> reports.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > Manasa
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Has anyone found any accounting gotcha's in 701?

If so would you be willing to share your issues? We are FIFO, but we are still interested in anything that is happening!

We are using VMware and we also noticed issues with the crystal reports.

TIA,

Manasa
















[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
If I recall correctly, the issue with report styles is the only major
problem I've run into so far. I haven't seen any new accounting issues yet.

*John Driggers*
**
*Chief Data Wrangler*
*
*
*I have an Epicor blog <http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is that?*
*
*:: 904.404.9233
:: waffqle@...
:: http://www.usdoingstuff.com <http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>

*

*


On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Manasa Reddy <mreddy@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Has anyone found any accounting gotcha's in 701?
>
> If so would you be willing to share your issues? We are FIFO, but we are
> still interested in anything that is happening!
>
> We are using VMware and we also noticed issues with the crystal reports.
>
> TIA,
>
> Manasa
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
John,
Can you give more detail about the report style issue, or is there another thread on this?

Cheers
Simon Hall

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, John Driggers <waffqle@...> wrote:
>
> If I recall correctly, the issue with report styles is the only major
> problem I've run into so far. I haven't seen any new accounting issues yet.
>
> *John Driggers*
> **
> *Chief Data Wrangler*
> *
> *
> *I have an Epicor blog <http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is that?*
> *
> *:: 904.404.9233
> :: waffqle@...
> :: http://www.usdoingstuff.com <http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>
>
> *
>
> *
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Manasa Reddy <mreddy@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Has anyone found any accounting gotcha's in 701?
> >
> > If so would you be willing to share your issues? We are FIFO, but we are
> > still interested in anything that is happening!
> >
> > We are using VMware and we also noticed issues with the crystal reports.
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > Manasa
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
5
We've found that the posting rules that are defined 8.03.409C did not come across to E9.05.701. Also, have had to do some Plant configuration as the GL Division did not come across. Posted to Epicor to assure that we did not miss some step in the conversion. We are still in the testing phase and have uncovered many issues, some are cosmetic, but enough to create some headaches.

Carol


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]