# BPM to prevent over-receiving a PO

**URL:** <https://www.epiusers.help/t/bpm-to-prevent-over-receiving-a-po/84027>\
**Category:** Epicor ERP 10\
**Tags:** receipt-entry\
**Created:** [October 28, 2021, 2:17pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/bpm-to-prevent-over-receiving-a-po/84027 "2021-10-28T14:17:54Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JasonMcD](https://www.epiusers.help/user_avatar/www.epiusers.help/jasonmcd/32/22326_2.png) [@JasonMcD](https://www.epiusers.help/u/JasonMcD)\
**Post date:** [November 1, 2021, 6:42pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/bpm-to-prevent-over-receiving-a-po/84027/10 "2021-11-01T18:42:05Z")

</div>

Alright, I think we got it!

![image](https://www.epiusers.help/uploads/default/original/3X/d/e/de243d3a75e824b6d2af7d650284f8af9675201b.png)

So, I had been using the BO of `RcvDtlSearch` (seemed like it would be less bloated), but in fact **I needed** `Receipt` **instead** , in order to get that “transaction” quantity.

Still more work to do, but huzzah! Go @A.Baeisa !

To reiterate, this code did work just fine if you use the right BO:

![image](https://www.epiusers.help/uploads/default/original/3X/2/e/2e53d62f8514226d59d5efa77a39b0f901c02e5a.png)

By the way,

> **RcvDtlSearch parameters**
>
> ![image](https://www.epiusers.help/uploads/default/original/3X/a/a/aa9aa2d9ed31a935a3ce4af004d868ca2325cdc6.png)

vs.

> **Receipt paraneters**
>
> ![image](https://www.epiusers.help/uploads/default/original/3X/e/e/eeeb544b538d0e551a3e390d30a15dbbb485f950.png)

Well, it gets it done, at least.

---

_[View the full topic](https://www.epiusers.help/t/bpm-to-prevent-over-receiving-a-po/84027)._
