Hey Vic,
This is one of the reasons we have our test environment on VMWare.
I believe you can use VMWare very cheaply on small non-production scale, if you wanted to go that route.
This is one of the reasons we have our test environment on VMWare.
I believe you can use VMWare very cheaply on small non-production scale, if you wanted to go that route.
--- On Tue, 11/8/11, Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@...> wrote:
From: Vic Drecchio <vic.drecchio@...>
Subject: [Vantage] BPM's in Different Environments
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, November 8, 2011, 3:07 PM
Â
(Vantage 8.03.409C Progress)
I’m very new to BPMs. For every time I get excited about them, there’s something that makes me shake my head.
If I’m in the TEST environment and create a BPM on a certain BO and method, it seems that if I have the LIVE environment with the same BPMs... and I change something in TEST it effects the LIVE environment?
I called Epicor support and they verified that this is true in Vantage (not in E9).
I’m just curious on what everyone does to build and tweak BPMs in different environments.
I got a “Deadloop has been resolved†error this morning on one of my LIVE BPMs that I am *certain* was working 100% OK on Friday. Yesterday I changed things in TEST on that same BPM and it screwed up LIVE’s BPM... which resulted in that “Deadloop has been resolved†issue (even though I have the “Prevent Loops†checked).
So, I have a good, working BPM in LIVE. I restore LIVE to TEST. I make changes to the BPM in TEST and it effects the same BPM in LIVE.... wow. Am I doing something wrong and/or is Epicor support wrong?
TIA.
Vic
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]