I agree with you!!!! It would help us to have a way to see what the
old cost was made up of....a way to look at the cost of the old BOM
and Routing that was rolled up to come up with the old std cost. The
BOM and routing can change on a part, but if it is not re-rolled the
current BOM and Routing is not going to be equal to the std cost.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "saab_barracuda" <chris.clunn@...>
wrote:
old cost was made up of....a way to look at the cost of the old BOM
and Routing that was rolled up to come up with the old std cost. The
BOM and routing can change on a part, but if it is not re-rolled the
current BOM and Routing is not going to be equal to the std cost.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "saab_barracuda" <chris.clunn@...>
wrote:
>not
> When you update the std cost, the old std cost is overwritten and
> saved anywhere. I wish they would add another dimension for thedate
> on the costs. It would be a really nice tool for trending costsover
> time and save some trees (see below). That and adding frozen costsas
> well. I could go on and on...data
>
> Anyway, I would HIGHLY recommend running and printing Print Cost Set
> Group from the action menu BEFORE running the Post process. This
> report shows the before and after and will be your only source of
> after posting. Select both mfg and purchased parts and Check thebox
> for "Changed Items Only".CostPart
>
> And just so you know, if you make any changes to purchased parts,
> these will get posted, like it or not. You can only filter on
> manufactured parts when posting.
>
> Isn't costing fun!
>
>
> Chris
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jasper Recto <jrecto@> wrote:
> >
> > When you create a cost set entry group and roll it up, the group
> edit list allows you to print out the parts that are affected by the
> roll up.
> >
> > I know that the information for the NEW standards is on the
> table. What table is the OLD standards on?
> >
> > Is it from the Part table? If it's from the part table, what
> happens if I print out an old group edit list?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jasper
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>