# Customers using AWS to host E10

**URL:** <https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511>\
**Category:** Epicor ERP 10\
**Tags:** e10\
**Created:** [April 21, 2020, 9:17am UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511 "2020-04-21T09:17:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkros](https://www.epiusers.help/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3ab097/32.png) [@dkros](https://www.epiusers.help/u/dkros)\
**Post date:** [April 21, 2020, 9:17am UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511/1 "2020-04-21T09:17:53Z")

</div>

Interested if we have any customer out there using AWS and how that is working for them. I have a large customer who is exploring this option.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MLamkin](https://www.epiusers.help/user_avatar/www.epiusers.help/mlamkin/32/20914_2.png) [@MLamkin](https://www.epiusers.help/u/MLamkin)\
**Post date:** [April 22, 2020, 3:16pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511/2 "2020-04-22T15:16:47Z")

</div>

That’s what we have and it works well. I can’t give much information about it, since I’m not the one that works with AWS, but we use it a lot to setup a server for use with a specific set of data, then shut it down and shut it down when done. Sometimes an inactive server will be deleted if it’s been there long enough. (like ones setup under an older version of Epicor).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dkros](https://www.epiusers.help/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/d/3ab097/32.png) [@dkros](https://www.epiusers.help/u/dkros)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2020, 9:32am UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511/3 "2020-04-24T09:32:20Z")

</div>

Tahnks Marjorie, can you contact me at [dkros@epicor.com](mailto:dkros@epicor.com) when you have time, thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jkane](https://www.epiusers.help/user_avatar/www.epiusers.help/jkane/32/57624_2.png) [@jkane](https://www.epiusers.help/u/jkane)\
**Post date:** [April 24, 2020, 2:08pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511/4 "2020-04-24T14:08:27Z")

</div>

The company is now closed, but I was implementing 10.1 on AWS a few years back. It worked great and there was no real noticeable difference. We were on AWS because if we started getting ITAR orders again, we could jump up to the government cloud on AWS pretty easily.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mark\_Wonsil](https://www.epiusers.help/user_avatar/www.epiusers.help/mark_wonsil/32/51594_2.png) [@Mark\_Wonsil](https://www.epiusers.help/u/Mark_Wonsil)\
**Post date:** [April 28, 2020, 2:13pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/customers-using-aws-to-host-e10/66511/5 "2020-04-28T14:13:18Z")

</div>

> [@jkane](#):
>
> We were on AWS because if we started getting ITAR orders

Since 2016, both Azure and AWS are good with ITAR.

> **[Microsoft, Amazon both receive highest FedRAMP status for their government...](https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-amazon-both-receive-highest-fedramp-status-for-their-government-clouds/)**
>
> Microsoft's Azure Government cloud and Amazon's AWS GovCloud both have received the highest level of FedRAMP accreditation.

Usually, you can save money with AWS. If you’re a big Azure Active Directory user then the integration with your security might be better with Azure. (MFA, etc…)