This is exactly what we do. The incoming parts that need inspection are
tranferred immediately from receiving to the pending inspection area (the
inventory transaction type is PUR-INS). The inspectors pass the qty that
passes and fails the rest. Inspection transfers the good product from
inspection to stock (all of our products are from stock as well)...the
transaction type code is INS-STK. The parts that fail usually have a DMR
written and then are dispositioned by MRB (INS-DMR), but you would probably
just scrap them without taking that extra step.
We use the same concept with parts we send to an OSS and they scrap a few
in their process. When the parts come back from the OSS, we receive the PO
qty (outgoing qty) and then receiving inspection scraps any qty descrepancy
based on the number that came back and sends the good quantity back on to
the job.
Amy O'Malley
Manufacturing Engineer
Synovis Interventional Solutions
omall004@...
tranferred immediately from receiving to the pending inspection area (the
inventory transaction type is PUR-INS). The inspectors pass the qty that
passes and fails the rest. Inspection transfers the good product from
inspection to stock (all of our products are from stock as well)...the
transaction type code is INS-STK. The parts that fail usually have a DMR
written and then are dispositioned by MRB (INS-DMR), but you would probably
just scrap them without taking that extra step.
We use the same concept with parts we send to an OSS and they scrap a few
in their process. When the parts come back from the OSS, we receive the PO
qty (outgoing qty) and then receiving inspection scraps any qty descrepancy
based on the number that came back and sends the good quantity back on to
the job.
Amy O'Malley
Manufacturing Engineer
Synovis Interventional Solutions
omall004@...
On 23 Jul 2004, Russ Dover wrote:
> Aaron
> If you use the quality module you would receive 100 parts to
> inspection. Accept 95, Reject 5 to scrap.
> You will have to test the costing.
> HTH
>
> Russ Dover
>
>
> To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
> From: "Aaron Hoyt" <hoyt@...>
> Subject: [Vantage] Destructive Test
>
> > Is there anyone else out there that runs destructive tests on incoming
> > material?
> > Here is the example:
> > We order 100 electrical parts. The test is to determine their limits.
> > We test 5. If they pass, the lot is passed and received. In passing
> > the test the 5 are destroyed. We have to pass the whole lot and then
> > adjust out the 5 that were destroyed in testing.
> > Is there an elegant way of handling this in Vantage?
> > Suggestions have included creating a job, but we don't want to assign
> > cost/overhead (or the added work) if they may fail and be returned to
> > vendor.
> > We receive to stock and issue to jobs later due to the nature of our
> > products.