E9 - One operator, two machines scenario

Thanks Scott. That's exactly right. We have one man working two CNC
machines and the time gets split between the two machines. Our scenario is
backwards from what Tim was asking about.

Mark W.


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Scott Litzau <scott.litzau@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Split Burden is for multiple Operators -> One Machine, this calculates the
> burden to equal the amount of time the machine is running and does not let
> each operators labor time go into the burden of the operation. We have a
> Transfer Press that two operators run, when both are clocked into the
> operation it divides their labor time so that we only get the burden time
> into that operation, not the accumulated labor time of both operators.
>
> Leave all checkboxes blank and make sure they are clocking into the proper
> resource. The time the operator is clocked in on that job\operation will be
> applied as Burden time. We have a Resource Group of Printers and we have
> the operator make sure to select which Resource they are using in the group
> so we can see the burden and how many hours a machine has run
> (theoretically)
>
> Also, do not use Burden Time = Labor Time, because that operator's labor
> time will be divided among the multiple operation, or machines, they are
> running and you will not get an accurate burden time into the job.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of
> Mark Wonsil
> Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:44 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] E9 - One operator, two machines senerio
>
> Hey Tim,
>
> If memory serves, you just click the "Split Burden" box on your Resource
> Group where you want split the time. Check that box and try it out. I'm
> pretty sure that did it.
>
> Mark W.
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Tim Vonderhaar <
> tvonderhaar@...
> > wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > We are beginning testing scenarios with one operator and two machines
> > and would appreciate any experience the group has on the subject. I
> > have searched the archive and haven't found anything.
> >
> > Soooo, does the system out of the box divide labor hours across
> > multiple concurrent activities? If not, are there setting that need
> > set to instruct the system to do so or are we looking at a customization?
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Split Burden is for multiple Operators -> One Machine, this calculates the
burden to equal the amount of time the machine is running and does not let
each operators labor time go into the burden of the operation. We have a
Transfer Press that two operators run, when both are clocked into the
operation it divides their labor time so that we only get the burden time
into that operation, not the accumulated labor time of both operators.

Leave all checkboxes blank and make sure they are clocking into the proper
resource. The time the operator is clocked in on that job\operation will be
applied as Burden time. We have a Resource Group of Printers and we have
the operator make sure to select which Resource they are using in the group
so we can see the burden and how many hours a machine has run
(theoretically)

Also, do not use Burden Time = Labor Time, because that operator's labor
time will be divided among the multiple operation, or machines, they are
running and you will not get an accurate burden time into the job.

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Mark Wonsil
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 3:44 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] E9 - One operator, two machines senerio

Hey Tim,

If memory serves, you just click the "Split Burden" box on your Resource
Group where you want split the time. Check that box and try it out. I'm
pretty sure that did it.

Mark W.


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Tim Vonderhaar <tvonderhaar@...
> wrote:

> **
>
>
> We are beginning testing scenarios with one operator and two machines
> and would appreciate any experience the group has on the subject. I
> have searched the archive and haven't found anything.
>
> Soooo, does the system out of the box divide labor hours across
> multiple concurrent activities? If not, are there setting that need
> set to instruct the system to do so or are we looking at a customization?
>
> Tim
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links