E9 - One operator, two machines senerio

Thanks Mark. We will give it a shot.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
> Hey Tim,
>
> If memory serves, you just click the "Split Burden" box on your Resource
> Group where you want split the time. Check that box and try it out. I'm
> pretty sure that did it.
>
> Mark W.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Tim Vonderhaar <tvonderhaar@...
> > wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > We are beginning testing scenarios with one operator and two machines and
> > would appreciate any experience the group has on the subject. I have
> > searched the archive and haven't found anything.
> >
> > Soooo, does the system out of the box divide labor hours across multiple
> > concurrent activities? If not, are there setting that need set to instruct
> > the system to do so or are we looking at a customization?
> >
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
We are beginning testing scenarios with one operator and two machines and would appreciate any experience the group has on the subject. I have searched the archive and haven't found anything.

Soooo, does the system out of the box divide labor hours across multiple concurrent activities? If not, are there setting that need set to instruct the system to do so or are we looking at a customization?

Tim
Hey Tim,

If memory serves, you just click the "Split Burden" box on your Resource
Group where you want split the time. Check that box and try it out. I'm
pretty sure that did it.

Mark W.


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Tim Vonderhaar <tvonderhaar@...
> wrote:

> **
>
>
> We are beginning testing scenarios with one operator and two machines and
> would appreciate any experience the group has on the subject. I have
> searched the archive and haven't found anything.
>
> Soooo, does the system out of the box divide labor hours across multiple
> concurrent activities? If not, are there setting that need set to instruct
> the system to do so or are we looking at a customization?
>
> Tim
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]