# Engineering Workbench Revision Comments vs Method Tracker Revision Comments formatting

**URL:** <https://www.epiusers.help/t/engineering-workbench-revision-comments-vs-method-tracker-revision-comments-formatting/103511>\
**Category:** Epicor ERP 10\
**Tags:** engineering-workbenc, method-tracker\
**Created:** [June 1, 2023, 7:44pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/engineering-workbench-revision-comments-vs-method-tracker-revision-comments-formatting/103511 "2023-06-01T19:44:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MRoether](https://www.epiusers.help/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/m/258eb7/32.png) [@MRoether](https://www.epiusers.help/u/MRoether)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2023, 7:44pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/engineering-workbench-revision-comments-vs-method-tracker-revision-comments-formatting/103511/1 "2023-06-01T19:44:34Z")

</div>

Are there special characters to help formatting the Engineering workbench revision comments? I put them in as a line for each change and press enter to go to the next line and they look fine i the workbench but when I look at the revision comments in Method Tracker they show up as a single line of text.  
From the workbench:  
594522-00/R Created & Approved 03/31/23 / MJR  
Removed all components from BOM 05/25/23 /MJR  
Changed TECOMET part to CUSTOMER part on VERIFY TORQUE operation 06/01/23 /MJR

From Method Tracker:  
594522-00/R Created & Approved 03/31/23 / MJRRemoved all components from BOM 05/25/23 /MJRChanged TECOMET part to CUSTOMER part on VERIFY TORQUE operation 06/01/23 /MJR

Mike

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![klincecum](https://www.epiusers.help/user_avatar/www.epiusers.help/klincecum/32/100137_2.png) [@klincecum](https://www.epiusers.help/u/klincecum)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2023, 8:14pm UTC](https://www.epiusers.help/t/engineering-workbench-revision-comments-vs-method-tracker-revision-comments-formatting/103511/2 "2023-06-01T20:14:11Z")

</div>

Looks like they are being stripped. 🤔