Epicor 9.05 database schema changes

I believe that if you look in one of the folders under ClientServer, you'll
find the actual scripts for the schema changes for each version.

Mark W.

On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Gibson <gibson_west@...> wrote:

>
>
> Thanks Brian,
>
> I think this will help a lot.
>
> Gibson
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
> >
> > Epicor does provide documentation on the schema changes, but I didn't
> > find it that useful - lots of details, but no explanation of why:
> >
> > https://epicweb.epicor.com/Education/OnlineHelpFeatureSummary/Epicor%209
> > /9.05/enu/Standard/SchemaChanges/SchemaChanges.html
> >
> >
> >
> > I found it more useful to find the info I wanted in the UI, then use
> > Field Help -> Technical Details to find the table & column name. From
> > that starting point I would poke around in the data dictionary or in the
> > BAQ "related tables".
> >
> >
> >
> > I also asked on this list a few times for help :-)
> >
> >
> >
> > And if you're looking at more financial stuff, the other big change is
> > the new TranGLC table. A bunch of transaction stuff has moved from
> > other tables into there.
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Gibson
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 3:21 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the info Brian.
> >
> > How did you become of aware of the changes in 9.04. Is it documented
> > somewhere. My company never really went to 9.04 in production. We just
> > got to the testing phase and ran into a showstopper that's been fixed in
> > 9.05. So we are converting now from 8.03 passing thru 9.04 to 9.05.
> >
> > Gibson
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> > >
> > > The account type codes were replaced by GL Control Codes in 9.04. The
> > > link between things (like vendors) and GL codes are in the EntityGLC
> > > table - filter for RelatedToFile = 'Vendor' and Key1 will be the
> > vendor
> > > number. Note that a particular vendor may not have a GL code assigned,
> > > so use an outer join in your query.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's part of a BAQ for customers, should be very similar for
> > vendors:
> > >
> > > for each Customer no-lock , each EntityGLC no-lock outer-join where
> > > (Customer.Company = EntityGLC.Company and Customer.CustNum =
> > > EntityGLC.Key1 ) and EntityGLC.RelatedToFile = 'Customer' And
> > > EntityGLC.GLControlType = 'AR Account' by Customer.CustID .
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Brian.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Gibson
> > > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:43 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from
> > the
> > > Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that
> > > could have relaced it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gibson
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > > "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05.
> > There
> > > > were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> > > > looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the
> > table
> > > > you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Which columns are you having trouble finding?
> > > >
> > > > Brian.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> > > Behalf
> > > > Of Gibson
> > > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been
> > > deleted
> > > > in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the
> > > data
> > > > is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a
> > > new
> > > > column name?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Gibson
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been deleted in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the data is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a new column name?

Thanks Gibson
I don't know if they do it for EVERY field, but I've seen a lot of occasions
where they rename the column 'OBSOLETE9.4_FieldName' or something similar. A
quick look at the data dictionary should show you if they're there or not.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Gibson <gibson_west@...> wrote:

>
>
> There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been deleted in
> 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the data is
> being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a new column
> name?
>
> Thanks Gibson
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05. There
were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the table
you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.



Which columns are you having trouble finding?

Brian.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gibson
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes





There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been deleted
in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the data
is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a new
column name?

Thanks Gibson





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from the Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that could have relaced it.

Thanks,
Gibson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
>
> I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05. There
> were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the table
> you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
>
>
>
> Which columns are you having trouble finding?
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Gibson
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
>
>
>
>
>
> There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been deleted
> in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the data
> is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a new
> column name?
>
> Thanks Gibson
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
The account type codes were replaced by GL Control Codes in 9.04. The
link between things (like vendors) and GL codes are in the EntityGLC
table - filter for RelatedToFile = 'Vendor' and Key1 will be the vendor
number. Note that a particular vendor may not have a GL code assigned,
so use an outer join in your query.



Here's part of a BAQ for customers, should be very similar for vendors:

for each Customer no-lock , each EntityGLC no-lock outer-join where
(Customer.Company = EntityGLC.Company and Customer.CustNum =
EntityGLC.Key1 ) and EntityGLC.RelatedToFile = 'Customer' And
EntityGLC.GLControlType = 'AR Account' by Customer.CustID .



Brian.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gibson
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:43 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes





In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from the
Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that
could have relaced it.

Thanks,
Gibson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
>
> I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05. There
> were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the table
> you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
>
>
>
> Which columns are you having trouble finding?
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of Gibson
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
>
>
>
>
>
> There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been
deleted
> in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the
data
> is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a
new
> column name?
>
> Thanks Gibson
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a 904.507A database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is 15GB. We have tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still active, but has been running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit server, so the schema change has to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to running this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on a client in the 32 bit environment.

We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight forward, but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.

Thanks in Advance,


Paul Lipham
Information Technology Manager
Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
152 Metal Samples Road
Munford, AL 36268




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Odd question, are your client and your server on the same physical
location?? I had this problem in the past, bc I was running Schema Change
form my home(client) through VPN it took like 2 days :(

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:

>
>
> We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a 904.507A
> database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is 15GB. We have
> tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still active, but has been
> running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit server, so the schema change has
> to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to running
> this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on a client in the
> 32 bit environment.
>
> We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight forward,
> but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
>
> Paul Lipham
> Information Technology Manager
> Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
> 152 Metal Samples Road
> Munford, AL 36268
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I have client and the server on the same Cisco 3560G series switch so they are connected at 1GB. We see the port activity on the switch and also see the RAID set for the Database flashing with activity. The schema change screen is blank. The client CPU usage is around 55%

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jose Gomez
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:41 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905

Odd question, are your client and your server on the same physical
location?? I had this problem in the past, bc I was running Schema Change
form my home(client) through VPN it took like 2 days :(

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:

>
>
> We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a 904.507A
> database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is 15GB. We have
> tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still active, but has been
> running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit server, so the schema change has
> to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to running
> this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on a client in the
> 32 bit environment.
>
> We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight forward,
> but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.
>
> Thanks in Advance,
>
> Paul Lipham
> Information Technology Manager
> Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
> 152 Metal Samples Road
> Munford, AL 36268
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
How big is your DB? It may just be taking that long.

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:

>
>
> I have client and the server on the same Cisco 3560G series switch so they
> are connected at 1GB. We see the port activity on the switch and also see
> the RAID set for the Database flashing with activity. The schema change
> screen is blank. The client CPU usage is around 55%
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Jose Gomez
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:41 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905
>
> Odd question, are your client and your server on the same physical
> location?? I had this problem in the past, bc I was running Schema Change
> form my home(client) through VPN it took like 2 days :(
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
>
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez
> >
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a 904.507A
> > database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is 15GB. We have
> > tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still active, but has been
> > running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit server, so the schema change
> has
> > to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to running
> > this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on a client in
> the
> > 32 bit environment.
> >
> > We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight
> forward,
> > but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> >
> > Paul Lipham
> > Information Technology Manager
> > Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
> > 152 Metal Samples Road
> > Munford, AL 36268
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
It's 15GB and the process has been running for 21 hours at this point.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jose Gomez
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:56 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905

How big is your DB? It may just be taking that long.

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:

>
>
> I have client and the server on the same Cisco 3560G series switch so they
> are connected at 1GB. We see the port activity on the switch and also see
> the RAID set for the Database flashing with activity. The schema change
> screen is blank. The client CPU usage is around 55%
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Jose Gomez
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:41 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905
>
> Odd question, are your client and your server on the same physical
> location?? I had this problem in the past, bc I was running Schema Change
> form my home(client) through VPN it took like 2 days :(
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
>
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez
> >
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a 904.507A
> > database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is 15GB. We have
> > tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still active, but has been
> > running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit server, so the schema change
> has
> > to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to running
> > this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on a client in
> the
> > 32 bit environment.
> >
> > We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight
> forward,
> > but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> >
> > Paul Lipham
> > Information Technology Manager
> > Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
> > 152 Metal Samples Road
> > Munford, AL 36268
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
Thanks for the info Brian.

How did you become of aware of the changes in 9.04. Is it documented somewhere. My company never really went to 9.04 in production. We just got to the testing phase and ran into a showstopper that's been fixed in 9.05. So we are converting now from 8.03 passing thru 9.04 to 9.05.

Gibson


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
>
> The account type codes were replaced by GL Control Codes in 9.04. The
> link between things (like vendors) and GL codes are in the EntityGLC
> table - filter for RelatedToFile = 'Vendor' and Key1 will be the vendor
> number. Note that a particular vendor may not have a GL code assigned,
> so use an outer join in your query.
>
>
>
> Here's part of a BAQ for customers, should be very similar for vendors:
>
> for each Customer no-lock , each EntityGLC no-lock outer-join where
> (Customer.Company = EntityGLC.Company and Customer.CustNum =
> EntityGLC.Key1 ) and EntityGLC.RelatedToFile = 'Customer' And
> EntityGLC.GLControlType = 'AR Account' by Customer.CustID .
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Gibson
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
>
>
>
>
>
> In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from the
> Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that
> could have relaced it.
>
> Thanks,
> Gibson
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> >
> > I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05. There
> > were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> > looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the table
> > you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
> >
> >
> >
> > Which columns are you having trouble finding?
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of Gibson
> > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been
> deleted
> > in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the
> data
> > is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a
> new
> > column name?
> >
> > Thanks Gibson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Just as a point, it is also important to take the processing power of the
"Admin Workstation" into account, the process will take a lot longer running
on an actual workstation compared to running the changes from a server with
the "admin workstation" tools installed.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Paul Lipham
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 3:06 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905

It's 15GB and the process has been running for 21 hours at this point.

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Jose Gomez
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:56 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905

How big is your DB? It may just be taking that long.

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:

>
>
> I have client and the server on the same Cisco 3560G series switch so
> they are connected at 1GB. We see the port activity on the switch and
> also see the RAID set for the Database flashing with activity. The
> schema change screen is blank. The client CPU usage is around 55%
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Jose Gomez
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:41 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Problem running schema changes 904 to 905
>
> Odd question, are your client and your server on the same physical
> location?? I had this problem in the past, bc I was running Schema
> Change form my home(client) through VPN it took like 2 days :(
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
>
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez>
> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez
> >
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez>
> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Paul Lipham <pml@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > We have not been able to get a schema change to complete on a
> > 904.507A database going to 905.506. We are on Progress and the DB is
> > 15GB. We have tried it a few times this week. Currently it's still
> > active, but has been running for over 19 hours. We have a 64 bit
> > server, so the schema change
> has
> > to be ran on an admin PC, which is new to us. We have been use to
> > running this on the server; however Epicor says we must run this on
> > a client in
> the
> > 32 bit environment.
> >
> > We have followed the upgrade instructions that seem to be straight
> forward,
> > but would like to know if anyone could give us any advice.
> >
> > Thanks in Advance,
> >
> > Paul Lipham
> > Information Technology Manager
> > Alabama Specialty Products, Inc.
> > 152 Metal Samples Road
> > Munford, AL 36268
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access.
> )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links





------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
Epicor does provide documentation on the schema changes, but I didn't
find it that useful - lots of details, but no explanation of why:

https://epicweb.epicor.com/Education/OnlineHelpFeatureSummary/Epicor%209
/9.05/enu/Standard/SchemaChanges/SchemaChanges.html



I found it more useful to find the info I wanted in the UI, then use
Field Help -> Technical Details to find the table & column name. From
that starting point I would poke around in the data dictionary or in the
BAQ "related tables".



I also asked on this list a few times for help :-)



And if you're looking at more financial stuff, the other big change is
the new TranGLC table. A bunch of transaction stuff has moved from
other tables into there.



Brian.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Gibson
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 3:21 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes





Thanks for the info Brian.

How did you become of aware of the changes in 9.04. Is it documented
somewhere. My company never really went to 9.04 in production. We just
got to the testing phase and ran into a showstopper that's been fixed in
9.05. So we are converting now from 8.03 passing thru 9.04 to 9.05.

Gibson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
>
> The account type codes were replaced by GL Control Codes in 9.04. The
> link between things (like vendors) and GL codes are in the EntityGLC
> table - filter for RelatedToFile = 'Vendor' and Key1 will be the
vendor
> number. Note that a particular vendor may not have a GL code assigned,
> so use an outer join in your query.
>
>
>
> Here's part of a BAQ for customers, should be very similar for
vendors:
>
> for each Customer no-lock , each EntityGLC no-lock outer-join where
> (Customer.Company = EntityGLC.Company and Customer.CustNum =
> EntityGLC.Key1 ) and EntityGLC.RelatedToFile = 'Customer' And
> EntityGLC.GLControlType = 'AR Account' by Customer.CustID .
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of Gibson
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
>
>
>
>
>
> In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from
the
> Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that
> could have relaced it.
>
> Thanks,
> Gibson
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> >
> > I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05.
There
> > were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> > looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the
table
> > you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
> >
> >
> >
> > Which columns are you having trouble finding?
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of Gibson
> > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been
> deleted
> > in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the
> data
> > is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a
> new
> > column name?
> >
> > Thanks Gibson
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks Brian,

I think this will help a lot.

Gibson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Brian Roberts" <broberts@...> wrote:
>
> Epicor does provide documentation on the schema changes, but I didn't
> find it that useful - lots of details, but no explanation of why:
>
> https://epicweb.epicor.com/Education/OnlineHelpFeatureSummary/Epicor%209
> /9.05/enu/Standard/SchemaChanges/SchemaChanges.html
>
>
>
> I found it more useful to find the info I wanted in the UI, then use
> Field Help -> Technical Details to find the table & column name. From
> that starting point I would poke around in the data dictionary or in the
> BAQ "related tables".
>
>
>
> I also asked on this list a few times for help :-)
>
>
>
> And if you're looking at more financial stuff, the other big change is
> the new TranGLC table. A bunch of transaction stuff has moved from
> other tables into there.
>
>
>
> Brian.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Gibson
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 3:21 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info Brian.
>
> How did you become of aware of the changes in 9.04. Is it documented
> somewhere. My company never really went to 9.04 in production. We just
> got to the testing phase and ran into a showstopper that's been fixed in
> 9.05. So we are converting now from 8.03 passing thru 9.04 to 9.05.
>
> Gibson
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> >
> > The account type codes were replaced by GL Control Codes in 9.04. The
> > link between things (like vendors) and GL codes are in the EntityGLC
> > table - filter for RelatedToFile = 'Vendor' and Key1 will be the
> vendor
> > number. Note that a particular vendor may not have a GL code assigned,
> > so use an outer join in your query.
> >
> >
> >
> > Here's part of a BAQ for customers, should be very similar for
> vendors:
> >
> > for each Customer no-lock , each EntityGLC no-lock outer-join where
> > (Customer.Company = EntityGLC.Company and Customer.CustNum =
> > EntityGLC.Key1 ) and EntityGLC.RelatedToFile = 'Customer' And
> > EntityGLC.GLControlType = 'AR Account' by Customer.CustID .
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of Gibson
> > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 12:43 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In 9.04 the field name was obs900_apacctid. We were pulling it from
> the
> > Vendor table. It's gone in 9.05 and I cant find any field in 9.05 that
> > could have relaced it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Gibson
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> > "Brian Roberts" <broberts@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I had to deal with schema changes all the way from 6.1 to 9.05.
> There
> > > were a lot of differences, but I was able to find everything I was
> > > looking for in the end. If the data appears to be gone from the
> table
> > > you're looking at, its probably been moved into a child table.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Which columns are you having trouble finding?
> > >
> > > Brian.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> > Behalf
> > > Of Gibson
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 5:26 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Epicor 9.05 database schema changes
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > There are several 9.04 obsolete database columns that have been
> > deleted
> > > in 9.05. which we are still making use of. Does anyone know if the
> > data
> > > is being eliminated altogether or does 9.05 retain the data under a
> > new
> > > column name?
> > >
> > > Thanks Gibson
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>