Epicor licensing

Yahoo Archive
1
Jim, if you’re calling from the client app (already open) you will not burn another seat. Only if you opened another session would that be the case.

From: jim_chance
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2011 10:37 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Epicor licensing


Are we correct in our understanding with regard to Epicor licensing that if the Epicor client app were to call functions from the .dll, we would maintain the current session with Epicor and not cause the license
server to count another license in use as it does now when the .exe is
doing its work?

Epicor licenses are expensive. So, I don't want to use two
licenses to support for one actual user seat, even if it is only a
transient operation.

Otherwise I'd have to convert the app from .exe to .dll to save on the licensing; correct?





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Are we correct in our understanding with regard to Epicor licensing that if the Epicor client app were to call functions from the .dll, we would maintain the current session with Epicor and not cause the license
server to count another license in use as it does now when the .exe is
doing its work?

Epicor licenses are expensive. So, I don't want to use two
licenses to support for one actual user seat, even if it is only a
transient operation.

Otherwise I'd have to convert the app from .exe to .dll to save on the licensing; correct?
3
Generally speaking, every time you open a new session, Epicor dings a
license. For practical purposes, as long as you dispose your session when
your done and don't try to keep it open all the time, you should be fine.

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:37 AM, jim_chance <jim_chance@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Are we correct in our understanding with regard to Epicor licensing that if
> the Epicor client app were to call functions from the .dll, we would
> maintain the current session with Epicor and not cause the license
> server to count another license in use as it does now when the .exe is
> doing its work?
>
> Epicor licenses are expensive. So, I don't want to use two
> licenses to support for one actual user seat, even if it is only a
> transient operation.
>
> Otherwise I'd have to convert the app from .exe to .dll to save on the
> licensing; correct?
>
>
>



--
*Waffqle Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*

*

*


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]