ahhhh... a workaround but a solution maybe.
I forgot to mention this group is a phenomenal resource.
Thanks Ron.
David
I forgot to mention this group is a phenomenal resource.
Thanks Ron.
David
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Paquin
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:27 AM
> > To: Ron LaPean
> > Subject: RE: Is this a problem in 6.0?
> >
> > If that is an issue - then we would set up separate customers with
> > different bill to addresses and then link all of them together
> for credit
> > purposes. I am not entirely sure on the mechanics, but I
> believe this can
> > be done.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ron LaPean
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:24 AM
> > To: Bill Paquin
> > Subject: Is this a problem in 6.0?
> >
> > One beef with the accounting aspect is something we discovered a short
> > time
> > ago. At least on Vantage 5.2, when customer information (ex. billing
> > address) is changed, the info changes even on POSTED invoices. Could be
> > nothing for you but creates problems for us.
> > Some of our customers require invoices be sent to different locations
> > depending on what type of work was done. You can only have one billing
> > address at a time and that is displayed on all the invoices. There is no
> > easy way to determine which invoice address was used at the time of
> > posting.
> >
> > As to Progress vs. SQL, I have never heard people rave about a SQL
> > implementation. Progress appears to be the standard choice.