GetRows should allow all fields in the First Table of the GetRows method of
the original adapter
GetList should allow all fields available on the Simple Search (PO Base
Search) on the original adapter.
PS: Sometimes, BOReader just doesn't work no matter what the where clause
is, its some bug I've found on some adapters. Don't recall if PO is one of
them.
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
the original adapter
GetList should allow all fields available on the Simple Search (PO Base
Search) on the original adapter.
PS: Sometimes, BOReader just doesn't work no matter what the where clause
is, its some bug I've found on some adapters. Don't recall if PO is one of
them.
*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:29 PM, mmahrle <mmahrle@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> Sorry for the separate reply. Back to my original question, do you see any
> reason why the first GetRows wouldn't work?
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, John Driggers <waffqle@...> wrote:
> >
> > You could search by PO and return CustID and compare it to the current
> > order instead of having to do 2 searches.
> >
> > *John Driggers*
> > **
> > *Chief Data Wrangler*
> > *
> > *
> > *I have an Epicor blog <http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is that?*
> > *
> > *:: 904.404.9233
> > :: waffqle@...
> > :: http://www.usdoingstuff.com <http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>
> >
> > *
> >
> > *
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:52 PM, mmahrle <mmahrle@...> wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > Perhaps, but I don't care if different customers have duplicate PO
> > > numbers, only if the PO number has been used with another sales order
> for
> > > the customer that the new sales order is for. So, if I searched by PO,
> I'd
> > > still have to verify the customer if there were any other orders with
> that
> > > PO.
> > >
> > > I'll look into the Dup PO check.
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, John Driggers <waffqle@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would take the advice above. But if that doesn't work for some
> reason,
> > > > wouldn't it be easier to just search for the orders by PO instead of
> > > > searching by customer and then checking the POs?
> > > >
> > > > The logs are in:
> > > > mfgsys803\server\logs
> > > >
> > > > The usefulness of them will depend on what you have your logging
> level
> > > set
> > > > to. That said, even in verbose mode they aren't particularly helpful
> in
> > > > regards to BOReader. I don't recall exactly but I believe malformed
> calls
> > > > generate a fairly generic error message.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > *John Driggers*
> > > > **
> > > > *Chief Data Wrangler*
> > > > *
> > > > *
> > > > *I have an Epicor blog <http://usdoingstuff.com/>. How useful is
> that?*
> > > > *
> > > > *:: 904.404.9233
> > > > :: waffqle@
> > > > :: http://www.usdoingstuff.com <http://www.usdoingstuff.com/>
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:07 PM, bw2868bond <bwalker@>wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > > **
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "mmahrle" <mmahrle@> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm working in Vantage 8.03.409C. My ultimate goal is to check
> on the
> > > > > Order Entry form whether, when entering a new order, the PO number
> > > entered
> > > > > has been used before on another sales order for the same customer.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Can't you just turn on the Dup PO Check in Customer Entry?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]