How is DueDate calculated on Epicor 905.701 Invoice

Yahoo Archive
1
In your company config set up do you have invoice date = ship date? If so, could it be at the time you are generating invoices that this date is showing as a default and not being changed by the person reviewing the invoices?



________________________________
From: jseeman21 <jseeman@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2013 12:03 AM
Subject: [Vantage] How is DueDate calculated on Epicor 905.701 Invoice

Â
Hello,

It is our understanding that invoice due date is calculated based on the Customer Terms (eg 30EM - 30 Days End of Month) coupled with Invoice Date. However, we are finding this is not the case.

Can anyone confirm how the invoice due date is derived? It seems to be based on ShipDate regardless of invoice date.

In our specific example we shipped the goods on January 28, 2013 however we did not invoice until the 26th of February. According to our terms, the due date on the invoice should be 28th of March, however, when printing the invoice it is posting a due date of 28th of Feb (2 days after invoice post). In addition in our aging it has placed this invoice over 60 days!

Any assistance in understanding this calculated field is greatly appreciated.

Thank You
Jill Seeman




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Hello,

It is our understanding that invoice due date is calculated based on the Customer Terms (eg 30EM - 30 Days End of Month) coupled with Invoice Date. However, we are finding this is not the case.

Can anyone confirm how the invoice due date is derived? It seems to be based on ShipDate regardless of invoice date.

In our specific example we shipped the goods on January 28, 2013 however we did not invoice until the 26th of February. According to our terms, the due date on the invoice should be 28th of March, however, when printing the invoice it is posting a due date of 28th of Feb (2 days after invoice post). In addition in our aging it has placed this invoice over 60 days!

Any assistance in understanding this calculated field is greatly appreciated.

Thank You
Jill Seeman