It is actually not a bad practice depending upon your inspection stringency needs.
Most companies I've worked for use Mil-spec driven AQL sampling qty determining methods (not 100% inspection) and, if ANY of the sample from a received lot is suspect, ALL is failed for 100% review within a DMR process.
If we lose the (apparrantly unintended) flexible receipt inspection functionality when we eventually delve beyond 405, I won't lose sleep over it.
Rob
Most companies I've worked for use Mil-spec driven AQL sampling qty determining methods (not 100% inspection) and, if ANY of the sample from a received lot is suspect, ALL is failed for 100% review within a DMR process.
If we lose the (apparrantly unintended) flexible receipt inspection functionality when we eventually delve beyond 405, I won't lose sleep over it.
Rob
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...> wrote:
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@...>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 1:09 PM
Yeah, I even talked to one of the Epicor techies and he said he thought they were going to address it in 9.0 but as of now thats the way it works which is wierd that it reverted back to the way it was and did not keep the functionality in 405! I hate to send everything through DMR but it looks like that is the workaround
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 1:02 PM
Sounds like I'm happily on a verison where it is NOT functioning 'as designed' :)
Â
Worst case, why not reject to DMR and then you can starighten it out with the disposition?
Â
Rob
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 12:35 PM
Thanks Rob - tried it on 9.0 and it expects the full PO line amount to be dealt with at one time but I will go ahead and check on 405 and see if I get a different outcome
--- On Thu, 1/22/09, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Thursday, January 22, 2009, 12:25 PM
That's what I'm saying. In 405a you can inspection pass 50 out of your 250 and either leave the 200 balance uninspected or reject the 200 balance to DMR (either in a single Inspection entry or two seperate ones).
I'm not sure what is preventing you from doing it (unless it is a version quirk.)
To make sure I'm not imagining things I just DID this on our train db (which is a copy of our live system).
Rob
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 8:49 AM
Its not that Rob, in our environment we can process say 250 incoming parts, which may take several days. During that time we want to "approve" 50 of the 250 and leave the other 200 pending inspection instead of having to pass/fail the entire 250 at one time
--- On Wed, 1/21/09, Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Robert Brown <robertb_versa@ yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2009, 12:15 AM
On what version of 8 can't you inspection pass a portion of a PO receipt and fail the balance?
Works just fine on 405a.
Rob
--- On Tue, 1/20/09, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com>
Subject: [Vantage] Inspection Processing - Pass/Fail partial PO's
To: "Vantage User Group" <vantage@yahoogroup s .com>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2009, 3:06 PM
In 8.0. now you need to pass/fail the entire quantity of the purchase order at one time in inspection processing. Thought this may have been addressed in 9.0 but not so. Has anyone found a way to pass/fail part of a purchase order without having to take the whole amount through DMR?Â
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]