FYI,,,,,
The ADP/Payroll interface is such an animal....every SP release requires
another $1K to Epicor for recompiling the code for your installation.
We recently requested a customization using Excel as a graphic scheduler
for creating a Master Production Graphic schedule. The construction
required a new dll which put the customization into recompilation every SP
and Patch (= $).
We are currently working with CS to possibly use the dll that is used with
the MS Project interface and present the Master Production Gantt Chart in
MS Project, hopefully avoiding the additional recompilation charges since
the MSP dll is maintained concurrent with Patches & SP's.
At 01:35 PM 8/25/2008, bdmang_83 wrote:
The ADP/Payroll interface is such an animal....every SP release requires
another $1K to Epicor for recompiling the code for your installation.
We recently requested a customization using Excel as a graphic scheduler
for creating a Master Production Graphic schedule. The construction
required a new dll which put the customization into recompilation every SP
and Patch (= $).
We are currently working with CS to possibly use the dll that is used with
the MS Project interface and present the Master Production Gantt Chart in
MS Project, hopefully avoiding the additional recompilation charges since
the MSP dll is maintained concurrent with Patches & SP's.
At 01:35 PM 8/25/2008, bdmang_83 wrote:
>Ken,[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>You are charged for the customization each time there is a new
>release? Unreal! We had considered custom programming for an
>unrelated item - but if they charge anything after the initial
>programming I would have to think we will stay away from it.
>
>Have a great day,
>
>Brian
>
>--- In <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Ken
>Williams" <ken@...> wrote:
> >
> > We actually paid for a customization to the handheld software to
>allow
> > this capability. The Issue Material screen now has an "Add" button
>that
> > allows them to add and issue in one step.
> >
> > I've since realized that this likely could've been developed in
>house
> > and worked better then the customization we have now that requires
>us to
> > pay every minor release (which is a joke in and of itself). We'll
> > likely be changing this to our own work in the future as we see the
>need
> > to move to a minor release and don't want to pay for a version
>update to
> > our customization.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>vantage@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
>Behalf
> > Of Calvin Krusen
> > Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 9:38 AM
> > To: <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Issuing Material (that isn't on the BOM) to a
>job.
> >
> >
> >
> > Forgive me if this has been discussed before. But trying to search
> > the 68,000+ messages, using more than three search words, usually
> > ends up with a Yahoo 'server too busy error'.
> >
> > What's the best way to issue material to a job, if it's not on the
> > jobs material list?
> >
> > I've tried using the 'Issue Material' program, but that requires
>you
> > select a material sequence already in the job. You can change the
> > P/N for that sequence, and the issues go through. But the Job
>Detail
> > reports show the P/N of the item in the job's material list, with
>the
> > cost of the actual part issued.
> >
> > Using the 'Issue Material' method looks like a good way to issue
> > material substituted for that in the manufacturing details (ie:
>using
> > stainless steel screws, instead of the specified zinc plated).
> >
> > But I'm looking for a way to add material to a job without having
>to
> > redefine the job. We stock various sizes of ship crates, and the
> > crate used can not be accurately determined at the time the job is
> > defined.
> >
> > Should I make a dummy P/N (non-stocked? & qty bearing?) and put on
> > all jobs. Then use the 'Issue Material' program and substitue the
> > real part? Or is there another (preferably better) way?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Calvin Krusen
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>