Job Entry - Get Details

Yahoo Archive
1
Good morning All. I'm curious to see if anyone else has ever experienced this little quirk. When creating a new job (in Job Entry), while doing the "Get Details" function - has Vista/Vantage ever pulled in the details of a totally different part? This does not happen all of the time, just a few fliers here and there.

Vista 8.03.409C (Progress)
2
I need to setup a BPM or customization where a user is not allowed to "Get Details" in a job if the production Qty = 0 in the job. Has anybody set something like this up or have an idea on how I can get this accomplished?

Thank you,
 Dustin Biniek
UMC, Inc.
DustinB@...




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
What are you actually trying to prevent, ability to produce against or create demand against the material? It might be easier to do it for the released checkbox.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@...> wrote:
>
> I need to setup a BPM or customization where a user is not allowed to "Get Details" in a job if the production Qty = 0 in the job. Has anybody set something like this up or have an idea on how I can get this accomplished?
>
> Thank you,
> Â Dustin Biniek
> UMC, Inc.
> DustinB@...
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
4
Engineered might be a good trigger also. (In our environment, we may create engineered jobs weeks - and in the not so distance past, many months ahead of release to drive materials).

Unfortunately 'get details' is not a simple job entry BO method you can trap and stop (via client cusotmization or BPM). It is a subprocess program being called.

Rob Brown




________________________________
From: Michael McWilliams <mmcwilliams22@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:57:17 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Job Entry - Get Details





What are you actually trying to prevent, ability to produce against or create demand against the material? It might be easier to do it for the released checkbox.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@. ..> wrote:
>
> I need to setup a BPM or customization where a user is not allowed to "Get Details" in a job if the production Qty = 0 in the job. Has anybody set something like this up or have an idea on how I can get this accomplished?
>
> Thank you,
> Â Dustin Biniek
> UMC, Inc.
> DustinB@...
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
5
Thanks for the thoughts on this. I think I will be able to solve this issue via an alternate route.Â

Thanks again!
 Dustin Biniek





________________________________
From: Robert Brown <robertb_versa@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 4:23:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Job Entry - Get Details





Engineered might be a good trigger also. (In our environment, we may create engineered jobs weeks - and in the not so distance past, many months ahead of release to drive materials).

Unfortunately 'get details' is not a simple job entry BO method you can trap and stop (via client cusotmization or BPM). It is a subprocess program being called.

Rob Brown

____________ _________ _________ __
From: Michael McWilliams <mmcwilliams22@ yahoo.com>
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 3:57:17 PM
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Job Entry - Get Details

What are you actually trying to prevent, ability to produce against or create demand against the material? It might be easier to do it for the released checkbox.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, melissa hietala <kevmel822@. ..> wrote:
>
> I need to setup a BPM or customization where a user is not allowed to "Get Details" in a job if the production Qty = 0 in the job. Has anybody set something like this up or have an idea on how I can get this accomplished?
>
> Thank you,
> Â Dustin Biniek
> UMC, Inc.
> DustinB@...
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]