For some reason, a handful of the jobs in our stock Job Status Report are displaying a wrong PartDescription. Part Maintenance and Job Tracker show the correct description, but when we run the Job Status report some descriptions sometimes revert back to the “template” part number description.
For instance, say our template part number is “101-” and it has the stock description of “Customer diameter: -----, Customer length: -----”. We engineering adds a new 101 part, they duplicate this template, add the rest of the part number (e.g. 101-111221) and then modify the description (e.g. Customer diameter: 10mm, Customer length: 100mm). This new part then pulls into a job as desired (with the new description), but when we run the Job Status report some of those jobs display the old template description.
Yes, 100%. It seems that this has something to do with Co-Part description. When we duplicate a part, the co-part description automatically fills in with the original description… and doesn’t seem editable.
We don’t use co-parts. I’m guessing that the Job Status Report grabs the co-part description instead of the main part description.
Does that sound reasonable? Any way to avoid the co-part description from pre-filling?
I’m not at all familiar with the “Co-Part” tab and it’s fields.
Just looking now and it looks like every Revision has at least one Co-Part (mine have exactly 1, and I’m guessing since there is a list tab, there can be multiple Co-Parts per revision)
Try checking out the revision to see if that makes the Co-Part fields editable.
Thanks. Because we have multi-line descriptions, that duplicate window doesn’t work for us. We need to duplicate first with the description, then edit the description.
I’ll look into how a new revision changes things. Thank you!
(I agree the report should display the Part.Desc, but maybe it first checks for a Co-Part desc?)
Seems that the Co-Part is only used when you have the Advanced Production module.
But yes, the Co-Part Desc is set when the revision is created. So changing the Part Desc prior to creating a Rev should “fix” it (You might want to change the Part Desc back after creating the Rev)