Last Saved By Blank Title 107860

You are right Mark, I was just picking the first one that came to mind

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Mark <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:

> **
>
>
> Jose,
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Anon" <jgiese@...> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know much of anything about BPMs either :S.
> >
> > I need it to trigger anytime a transaction is performed so I don't know
> that there would be any conditions, and I need to set ShortChar04 = UserID.
> >
>
> Why In-Transaction vs. Standard? My understanding (which could be wrong)
> is that In-Transaction does one update at a time in case there's a
> dependency where Standard does all at once which is why it's "faster".
>
> Thanks!!!
>
> Mark W.
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Trying to add a custom last saved by feature to a screen. How can I go about setting ShortChar04 = userID beforeAdapterMethod, update.

I would like to do it in the screen customization I have started. Is beforeAdapterMethod the best event to use for this type of thing?
The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil ALWAYS
fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and not a
BPM?

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Anon <jgiese@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> Trying to add a custom last saved by feature to a screen. How can I go
> about setting ShortChar04 = userID beforeAdapterMethod, update.
>
> I would like to do it in the screen customization I have started. Is
> beforeAdapterMethod the best event to use for this type of thing?
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Jose wrote:
>
> The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil ALWAYS
> fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and not a
> BPM?

And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of the business object used.

Mark W.
I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better way to do it. Do you have any general direction on this?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
> Jose wrote:
> >
> > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil ALWAYS
> > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and not a
> > BPM?
>
> And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of the business object used.
>
> Mark W.
>
Data directives work almost exactly like BPM's except at a lower level, if
you can do a BPM you can do a Data Directive, simply do an
In Transaction Directive for the Table you want to store the info. Works
just like a BPM you have your COnditions and your Actions, one of which is
Set Field to X


Let me know if you need more details.

*Jose C Gomez*
*Software Engineer*
*
*
*checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
*
*T: 904.469.1524 mobile
E: jose@...
http://www.josecgomez.com
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
<http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
<http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
<http://www.usdoingstuff.com>

*Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*



On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Anon <jgiese@...>wrote:

> **
>
>
> I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better way to
> do it. Do you have any general direction on this?
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
> >
> > Jose wrote:
> > >
> > > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil
> ALWAYS
> > > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and
> not a
> > > BPM?
> >
> > And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive
> instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of
> the business object used.
> >
> > Mark W.
> >
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I don't know much of anything about BPMs either :S.

I need it to trigger anytime a transaction is performed so I don't know that there would be any conditions, and I need to set ShortChar04 = UserID.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jose Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> Data directives work almost exactly like BPM's except at a lower level, if
> you can do a BPM you can do a Data Directive, simply do an
> In Transaction Directive for the Table you want to store the info. Works
> just like a BPM you have your COnditions and your Actions, one of which is
> Set Field to X
>
>
> Let me know if you need more details.
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Anon <jgiese@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better way to
> > do it. Do you have any general direction on this?
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jose wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil
> > ALWAYS
> > > > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and
> > not a
> > > > BPM?
> > >
> > > And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive
> > instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of
> > the business object used.
> > >
> > > Mark W.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Never mind I figured it out

ttclient.curruid

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Anon" <jgiese@...> wrote:
>
> I don't know much of anything about BPMs either :S.
>
> I need it to trigger anytime a transaction is performed so I don't know that there would be any conditions, and I need to set ShortChar04 = UserID.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jose Gomez <jose@> wrote:
> >
> > Data directives work almost exactly like BPM's except at a lower level, if
> > you can do a BPM you can do a Data Directive, simply do an
> > In Transaction Directive for the Table you want to store the info. Works
> > just like a BPM you have your COnditions and your Actions, one of which is
> > Set Field to X
> >
> >
> > Let me know if you need more details.
> >
> > *Jose C Gomez*
> > *Software Engineer*
> > *
> > *
> > *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> > *
> > *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> > E: jose@
> > http://www.josecgomez.com
> > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez> <http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> > <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez> <http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> > <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> > <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> > <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
> >
> > *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Anon <jgiese@>wrote:
> >
> > > **
> > >
> > >
> > > I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better way to
> > > do it. Do you have any general direction on this?
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jose wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil
> > > ALWAYS
> > > > > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and
> > > not a
> > > > > BPM?
> > > >
> > > > And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive
> > > instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of
> > > the business object used.
> > > >
> > > > Mark W.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
System Management | Business Process Management | Setup

Data Directive

Pick a table. In your case, a Standard directive will suffice. Enter conditions, actions and then Enable. Fairly straight forward.

Mark W.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Anon" <jgiese@...> wrote:
>
> I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better way to do it. Do you have any general direction on this?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Mark" <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> >
> > Jose wrote:
> > >
> > > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that wil ALWAYS
> > > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization and not a
> > > BPM?
> >
> > And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data Directive instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates regardless of the business object used.
> >
> > Mark W.
> >
>
Jose,

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Anon" <jgiese@...> wrote:
>
> I don't know much of anything about BPMs either :S.
>
> I need it to trigger anytime a transaction is performed so I don't know that there would be any conditions, and I need to set ShortChar04 = UserID.
>

Why In-Transaction vs. Standard? My understanding (which could be wrong) is that In-Transaction does one update at a time in case there's a dependency where Standard does all at once which is why it's "faster".

Thanks!!!

Mark W.
I did this with a pre-processing BPM on the UD01.Update method, I assume
it would work with the Update method for other objects.



Conditions: none

Actions: set the UD01.ShortChar03 field of the changed row to the
DCD-USERID expression

and set the UD01.Date03 field of the changed row to the TODAY expression



That records the *last* change person & date, overwriting it *each* time
the record is saved. If you want to record the original creator only,
do a post-processing BPM on UD01.GetaNewUD01 instead.



Brian.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Anon
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Last Saved By





I don't know much of anything about BPMs either :S.

I need it to trigger anytime a transaction is performed so I don't know
that there would be any conditions, and I need to set ShortChar04 =
UserID.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Jose
Gomez <jose@...> wrote:
>
> Data directives work almost exactly like BPM's except at a lower
level, if
> you can do a BPM you can do a Data Directive, simply do an
> In Transaction Directive for the Table you want to store the info.
Works
> just like a BPM you have your COnditions and your Actions, one of
which is
> Set Field to X
>
>
> Let me know if you need more details.
>
> *Jose C Gomez*
> *Software Engineer*
> *
> *
> *checkout my new blog <http://www.usdoingstuff.com> *
> *
> *T: 904.469.1524 mobile
> E: jose@...
> http://www.josecgomez.com
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/josecgomez>
<http://www.facebook.com/josegomez>
> <http://www.google.com/profiles/jose.gomez>
<http://www.twitter.com/joc85>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/professional-resume/>
> <http://www.josecgomez.com/feed/>
> <http://www.usdoingstuff.com>
>
> *Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?*
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Anon <jgiese@...>wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > I don't know anything about data directives. Sounds like the better
way to
> > do it. Do you have any general direction on this?
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Mark" <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Jose wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The best thing to do is use a BPM it will be the only thing that
wil
> > ALWAYS
> > > > fire. Is there a reason why you want to do it as a customization
and
> > not a
> > > > BPM?
> > >
> > > And if you're on version 9, the best-er thing is a BPM Data
Directive
> > instead of a Method Directive. This will catch all updates
regardless of
> > the business object used.
> > >
> > > Mark W.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]