Llcreset.r Blank Title 121472

Yahoo Archive
1
Thanks for the info. Not sure why it's going haywire for this ECO but, this gives me something to look into.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of bw2868bond
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 12:05 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: llcreset.r



My guess would be LowLevelCode Reset

when you change a BOM the LowLevelCodes get re-evaluated to see if they need to be changed.....

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, Joe Englert <englertj@...<mailto:englertj@...>> wrote:
>
> We have a particular ECO that fails to allow parts to be checked in. The log file shows a million calls to an r file I know nothing about. Is anyone familiar with this and could let me know what triggers it and what it does? Thanks!
>
> [13/06/06@09:51:53.795-0400] P-012048 T-016896 1 AS -- bm/llcreset.p (D:\Epicor905\Server\bm\llcreset.r) at line 536
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
We have a particular ECO that fails to allow parts to be checked in. The log file shows a million calls to an r file I know nothing about. Is anyone familiar with this and could let me know what triggers it and what it does? Thanks!

[13/06/06@09:51:53.795-0400] P-012048 T-016896 1 AS -- bm/llcreset.p (D:\Epicor905\Server\bm\llcreset.r) at line 536



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
My guess would be LowLevelCode Reset

when you change a BOM the LowLevelCodes get re-evaluated to see if they need to be changed.....

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Joe Englert <englertj@...> wrote:
>
> We have a particular ECO that fails to allow parts to be checked in. The log file shows a million calls to an r file I know nothing about. Is anyone familiar with this and could let me know what triggers it and what it does? Thanks!
>
> [13/06/06@09:51:53.795-0400] P-012048 T-016896 1 AS -- bm/llcreset.p (D:\Epicor905\Server\bm\llcreset.r) at line 536
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>