In 9.04, you can create separate UOM's off the base.
An example would be bar stock where the base would be feet or inch and
the other UOM's would be multiples of the base. You can then use a 12'
bar using a UOM of 12FT and return to stock from the job a 4FT piece.
The BASE UOM would be 1FT with another UOM from that same UOM Class.
UOM Class: Length
UOM's:
UOM Code
Description
1 UOM
Operator
Conversion Factor
Base Equivalent
Base UOM
Default UOM
Part Specific
Active
FT
Feet
1 FT
*
1
= 1 FT
True
False
False
True
IN
Inch
1 IN
*
0.0245
= .0245 FT
False
False
False
True
M
Meter
1 M
*
3.2808399
= 3.2808399 FT
False
False
False
True
YD
Yard
1 YD
*
3
= 3 FT
False
False
False
True
12FT
12 foot Lengths (Full Bar)
1 12FT
*
12.0000000
= 12 FT
False
True
False
True
4FT
4 foot Lengths
1 4FT
*
4
= 4 FT
False
False
False
True
Charlie Smith
2W Technologies LLC
www.2WTech.com <http://www.2WTech.com>
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stephen Freeman
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 3:45 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: RE: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
Bruce, when you're saying dimensional inventory are you referring to a
concept or something that is available in 9.04?
We're in a similar situation. We have pieces of exotic material that we
don't want to scrap. Vantage may show you how many square inches of a
material you have but does the size of the material enable you to make
the part for the customer?
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Butler, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:28 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
From a costing perspective I subscribe to the theory the unusable
material is a consequence of the job therefore should be treated as a
job cost.
I would highly recommend using dimensional inventory. As a general
rule, I would recommend stocking in 1' increments always rounding down.
As another general rule, I would not stock under a 3' remnant unless it
is valuable material.
I would recommend not using additional part numbers especially if you
use engineering methods. The engineering methods will not know about
the new part numbers. When the job is created purchasing will get a
requirement to purchase the full quantity based on the older part number
in engineering.
Sample situation:
12' of material issued to job. 6' cut. Return 6' length as dimensional
length.
I would also advise not using lot numbers. They do not tell the system
anything about the actual quantity. They can further complicate the
issue if you do decide to use dimensional inventory. For every
dimension you stock you would need to reference a lot number. This
could get really cumbersome if you routinely have many lengths from many
lots used on a single job.
Aerospace & government contract machining generally requires heat number
tracking of source materials for DFARs compliance and material
composition tracability. For those reasons lot tracking may be an
additional burden of doing business.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>]
On Behalf
Of schmangy20000
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
Hello all. This is not a Vantage question per say but I thought I could
get some advice on the topic.
We buy a number of raw materials in lengths. We store the material in
feet in Vantage. When part of a length is used, the remainder is kept in
inventory. However, the left over cuts are often too short to be used in
many jobs. This can mislead our purchasing agent, he may see 200 feet of
a partular raw material in stock but it could be in lengths too short to
use in the jobs at hand.
We're tossing around the idea of creating a bunch of part numbers, one
for each foot length. I'm curious what others are doing to manage this
type of scenerio.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Gerry
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
An example would be bar stock where the base would be feet or inch and
the other UOM's would be multiples of the base. You can then use a 12'
bar using a UOM of 12FT and return to stock from the job a 4FT piece.
The BASE UOM would be 1FT with another UOM from that same UOM Class.
UOM Class: Length
UOM's:
UOM Code
Description
1 UOM
Operator
Conversion Factor
Base Equivalent
Base UOM
Default UOM
Part Specific
Active
FT
Feet
1 FT
*
1
= 1 FT
True
False
False
True
IN
Inch
1 IN
*
0.0245
= .0245 FT
False
False
False
True
M
Meter
1 M
*
3.2808399
= 3.2808399 FT
False
False
False
True
YD
Yard
1 YD
*
3
= 3 FT
False
False
False
True
12FT
12 foot Lengths (Full Bar)
1 12FT
*
12.0000000
= 12 FT
False
True
False
True
4FT
4 foot Lengths
1 4FT
*
4
= 4 FT
False
False
False
True
Charlie Smith
2W Technologies LLC
www.2WTech.com <http://www.2WTech.com>
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Stephen Freeman
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 3:45 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: RE: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
Bruce, when you're saying dimensional inventory are you referring to a
concept or something that is available in 9.04?
We're in a similar situation. We have pieces of exotic material that we
don't want to scrap. Vantage may show you how many square inches of a
material you have but does the size of the material enable you to make
the part for the customer?
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of Butler, Bruce
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:28 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
From a costing perspective I subscribe to the theory the unusable
material is a consequence of the job therefore should be treated as a
job cost.
I would highly recommend using dimensional inventory. As a general
rule, I would recommend stocking in 1' increments always rounding down.
As another general rule, I would not stock under a 3' remnant unless it
is valuable material.
I would recommend not using additional part numbers especially if you
use engineering methods. The engineering methods will not know about
the new part numbers. When the job is created purchasing will get a
requirement to purchase the full quantity based on the older part number
in engineering.
Sample situation:
12' of material issued to job. 6' cut. Return 6' length as dimensional
length.
I would also advise not using lot numbers. They do not tell the system
anything about the actual quantity. They can further complicate the
issue if you do decide to use dimensional inventory. For every
dimension you stock you would need to reference a lot number. This
could get really cumbersome if you routinely have many lengths from many
lots used on a single job.
Aerospace & government contract machining generally requires heat number
tracking of source materials for DFARs compliance and material
composition tracability. For those reasons lot tracking may be an
additional burden of doing business.
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>]
On Behalf
Of schmangy20000
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 9:32 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Managing raw material lengths
Hello all. This is not a Vantage question per say but I thought I could
get some advice on the topic.
We buy a number of raw materials in lengths. We store the material in
feet in Vantage. When part of a length is used, the remainder is kept in
inventory. However, the left over cuts are often too short to be used in
many jobs. This can mislead our purchasing agent, he may see 200 feet of
a partular raw material in stock but it could be in lengths too short to
use in the jobs at hand.
We're tossing around the idea of creating a bunch of part numbers, one
for each foot length. I'm curious what others are doing to manage this
type of scenerio.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Gerry
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]