.Net 2.0 Blank Title 54079

Yahoo Archive
1
installing it locally wont touch those remote users. in addition
your 1.1 code is untouched by 2.0 unless you specifically assign a
new version in an apps config via the requiredRuntime flag - which
doesnt apply here anyway since the app was designed for 1.1 - new 2.0
version to come in next version hopefully.





--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Ryhal, Chris" <cryhal@...> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
>
>
> Being a .NET developer, the architecture should be about the same
unless
> you're a developer, and then there are a few minor changes.
>
>
>
> Obviously test it out first on a test server or a test client
installing
> the .NET 2.0 framework, but the migration of just the simple frame
> SHOULD be ok.
>
>
>
> We are still running Vantage 6.1, but I have been playing with
Vantage
> 8.0xx and it ran fine in a .NET 2.0 environment because that's what
my
> custom code is being written in.
>
>
>
> One other thing, is that if your clients are just going to be
connecting
> to your Sharepoint InTRAnet site, they won't require the .NET 2.0
> framework. Just like going to any website on the internet built
in .NET
> 2.0 or 3.0 at that which I am seeing recently was released.
Regardless,
> you don't HAVE to have the framework.
>
>
>
> I hope that helps a little?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris Ryhal
>
> Triumph Fabrications - Shelbyville
>
> cryhal@...
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf
> Of Mark Wonsil
> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:55 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] .Net 2.0
>
>
>
> I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our
Terminal
> Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0.
> <sigh>
>
> Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have
some
> users
> who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark W.
>
>
> This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
> address.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
2
I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our Terminal
Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0. <sigh>

Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have some users
who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.

Thanks,

Mark W.
3
Mark



.Net 2.0 should run fine in parallel with .Net 1.1



We run webservices on clients on .Net 2.0 while having Vantage 8.00
running on 1.1 Framework. All on the same terminal server.



Gary



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Wonsil
Sent: 10 January 2007 19:55
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] .Net 2.0



I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our Terminal
Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0.
<sigh>

Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have some
users
who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.

Thanks,

Mark W.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
4
Mark,



Being a .NET developer, the architecture should be about the same unless
you're a developer, and then there are a few minor changes.



Obviously test it out first on a test server or a test client installing
the .NET 2.0 framework, but the migration of just the simple frame
SHOULD be ok.



We are still running Vantage 6.1, but I have been playing with Vantage
8.0xx and it ran fine in a .NET 2.0 environment because that's what my
custom code is being written in.



One other thing, is that if your clients are just going to be connecting
to your Sharepoint InTRAnet site, they won't require the .NET 2.0
framework. Just like going to any website on the internet built in .NET
2.0 or 3.0 at that which I am seeing recently was released. Regardless,
you don't HAVE to have the framework.



I hope that helps a little?



Thanks,

Chris Ryhal

Triumph Fabrications - Shelbyville

cryhal@...



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Wonsil
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 2:55 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] .Net 2.0



I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our Terminal
Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0.
<sigh>

Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have some
users
who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.

Thanks,

Mark W.


This message has been processed via your triumphgroup.com e-mail
address.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
5
I have both .net 1.1 and 2.0 installed no issues with vantage (I would
not recommend SharePoint 3.0 on a TS though but it should still work)



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mark Wonsil
Sent: 10 January 2007 19:55
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] .Net 2.0



I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our Terminal
Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0.
<sigh>

Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have some
users
who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.

Thanks,

Mark W.





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
6
Mark,
Here is my actual experience.
Vantage 8 / Crystal would give me errors if I only had .net v2 installed.
I had to specifically make sure that .net 1.1 was installed for everything
to work properly.
To solve my problem, I had both installed on the machine at the same time.

Lots of people suggested to me that 2.0 should work exactly the same as 1.1
in regard to vantage/crystal, but did not turn out this way. Spent a day
troubleshooting this with Vantage support who also claimed it should be no
problem, but we found the "truth" out together.

Carey


>From: "Mark Wonsil" <mark_wonsil@...>
>Reply-To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
>To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Vantage] .Net 2.0
>Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:54:43 -0500
>
>I was getting ready to install SharePoint Services 3.0 on our Terminal
>Server/Intranet server and saw there's a requirement for .Net 2.0. <sigh>
>
>Has anyone run into issues running V8.xxx using .Net 2.0? I have some users
>who use the V8 client remotely and I don't want to lose that.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mark W.
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get live scores and news about your team: Add the Live.com Football Page
www.live.com/?addtemplate=football&icid=T001MSN30A0701