Patti and Michael,
I believe this issue has actually existed since before .405, and I would
recommend that you look a little deeper before moving on. You should
probably investigate whether the running totals in your Part Transaction
History's are calculating properly and whether you may potentially capture
(or not capture) cost transactions that you may not want (or want) as a
result of ADJ-QTY transactions. At a previous employer, I discovered a
painful problem related to this Qty Bearing checkbox, a problem that was
compounded by a Service Connect workflow not being configured the way it
should have been.
Regards,
Scott
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
bpbuechler
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:03 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Part Maintenance - Qty Bearing Flag Bug (8.03.405 -
8.03.408x)
Usually when you take a part from Qty Bearing to not Qty Bearing...the
system defaults the changed Costing Method to S(tandard). I haven't verified
this if you are trying to mark it as Qty Bearing...so you might want to do
some doubling checking on the costing method on both the part and partplant
records.
Thanks
Patty Buechler
_____
--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com, "Michael
McWilliams" <mmcwilliams22@...> wrote:
product groups & part classes that are non qtybearing. I want to make sure I
am not missing some other fields that may need to be updated.
_____
are prompted with the question to change the Costing Method and Qty Bearing
flag on the Part Plant record.
screen); BUT NOT THE QTY BEARING FLAG.
I believe this issue has actually existed since before .405, and I would
recommend that you look a little deeper before moving on. You should
probably investigate whether the running totals in your Part Transaction
History's are calculating properly and whether you may potentially capture
(or not capture) cost transactions that you may not want (or want) as a
result of ADJ-QTY transactions. At a previous employer, I discovered a
painful problem related to this Qty Bearing checkbox, a problem that was
compounded by a Service Connect workflow not being configured the way it
should have been.
Regards,
Scott
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
bpbuechler
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:03 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Part Maintenance - Qty Bearing Flag Bug (8.03.405 -
8.03.408x)
Usually when you take a part from Qty Bearing to not Qty Bearing...the
system defaults the changed Costing Method to S(tandard). I haven't verified
this if you are trying to mark it as Qty Bearing...so you might want to do
some doubling checking on the costing method on both the part and partplant
records.
Thanks
Patty Buechler
_____
--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com, "Michael
McWilliams" <mmcwilliams22@...> wrote:
>wrote a bpm to uncheck it in the part record and in the partplant for the
>
> Does that flag any other fields in the partplant when you update. I just
product groups & part classes that are non qtybearing. I want to make sure I
am not missing some other fields that may need to be updated.
_____
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com,"bpbuechler" <pbuechler@> wrote:
> >to plague 408). If you change a part from QTY BEARING = True to False...you
> > I reported an issue yesterday that has exisited since 405 (and continues
are prompted with the question to change the Costing Method and Qty Bearing
flag on the Part Plant record.
> >flag (main screen) and changes the Costing Method on Part Plant (plant
> > If you answer YES...it changes the Part Costing Method and Qty Bearing
screen); BUT NOT THE QTY BEARING FLAG.
> >Qty Bearing Flag.
> > The workaround is to always go to the Plant tab and manually uncheck the
> >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > SCR53410
> > Tenatively scheduled to be fixed on 8.03.409
> >
> > Thanks
> > Patty Buechler
> >