Yeah, no luck. I tried going into the queries and 4GL and it all
validates, but it was not showing an 'IsSignatureValid' checkbox in the
ListView, and it showed the 'HasOutDatedDirectives' flag to true.
What I've done with the important ones is to export and re-import, and
that seemed to make Vantage happy.
For a couple of them, they still show as outdated, but they work. I
just checked the box and the rules fire and do what they're supposed to
do.
-bws
--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com
From: Rob Bucek [mailto:RBucek@...]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:55 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Brian W. Spolarich
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Post-408B Upgrade and BPM Directive Validations
In the past I have had to go into some that were using either queries,
and/or execute 4gl code actions, and re-validate the 4gl code itself.
In the query editor there is a button to the effect of check code or
syntax as well as the advanced 4gl execute code editor. Once it checks
the syntax you should be good to go. In all previous cases, it didn't
find any issues with the syntax, but for some reason prevented it from
validating.
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: (715) 284-5376 ext 3111
Mobile: (715)896-0590
FAX: (715)284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site) <http://www.dsmfg.com/>
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 12:22 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Post-408B Upgrade and BPM Directive Validations
Okay, so I'm a bit confused.
We tested 408B pretty thoroughly, and I thought we had tested our BPM
customizations as part of this.
However a bunch of my BPM directives are failing validations after
this weekend's upgrade.
I'm not sure I really understand how to resolve these validation
issues, since Vantage doesn't tell you *what* isn't valid about a given
method. I can manually mark them as valid, but if I ask Vantage to
validate the method again, it re-marks it as bad. However if I go into
the components of the method, everything validates. Some of them have
4GL code, but some of them are fairly straightforward pre-processing
query conditions and exception actions.
Can someone give me some insight on how to understand how to make this
work cleanly?
-bws
--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
<mailto:bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com> > ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com <http://www.advancedphotonix.com>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
validates, but it was not showing an 'IsSignatureValid' checkbox in the
ListView, and it showed the 'HasOutDatedDirectives' flag to true.
What I've done with the important ones is to export and re-import, and
that seemed to make Vantage happy.
For a couple of them, they still show as outdated, but they work. I
just checked the box and the rules fire and do what they're supposed to
do.
-bws
--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com
From: Rob Bucek [mailto:RBucek@...]
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:55 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Brian W. Spolarich
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Post-408B Upgrade and BPM Directive Validations
In the past I have had to go into some that were using either queries,
and/or execute 4gl code actions, and re-validate the 4gl code itself.
In the query editor there is a button to the effect of check code or
syntax as well as the advanced 4gl execute code editor. Once it checks
the syntax you should be good to go. In all previous cases, it didn't
find any issues with the syntax, but for some reason prevented it from
validating.
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: (715) 284-5376 ext 3111
Mobile: (715)896-0590
FAX: (715)284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site) <http://www.dsmfg.com/>
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brian W. Spolarich
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 12:22 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Post-408B Upgrade and BPM Directive Validations
Okay, so I'm a bit confused.
We tested 408B pretty thoroughly, and I thought we had tested our BPM
customizations as part of this.
However a bunch of my BPM directives are failing validations after
this weekend's upgrade.
I'm not sure I really understand how to resolve these validation
issues, since Vantage doesn't tell you *what* isn't valid about a given
method. I can manually mark them as valid, but if I ask Vantage to
validate the method again, it re-marks it as bad. However if I go into
the components of the method, everything validates. Some of them have
4GL code, but some of them are fairly straightforward pre-processing
query conditions and exception actions.
Can someone give me some insight on how to understand how to make this
work cleanly?
-bws
--
Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix
bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com>
<mailto:bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com> > ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com <http://www.advancedphotonix.com>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]