Project Labor Booking

Yahoo Archive
1
Hi Carson,



No there wasn't a workaround I'm afraid. I raised a call with Epicor and it
has now been put through as an enhancement request.



Thanks,



Darryn



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
carson251
Sent: 24 October 2012 20:14
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Project Labor Booking





Darryn,

Did you ever find a solution or workaround to this? We just started using
projects and it's an issue for us too.

Carson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , "Darryn
Ralph" <darrynralph@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is there a way other than Time & Expense Entry to book time to Project
Jobs?
>
>
>
> A lot of the guys who book their time through MES also work on Projects,
so
> it would be so much easier if they could book directly onto Project work
> instead of manually having to add it retrospectively.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Darryn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2
Hi,



Is there a way other than Time & Expense Entry to book time to Project Jobs?



A lot of the guys who book their time through MES also work on Projects, so
it would be so much easier if they could book directly onto Project work
instead of manually having to add it retrospectively.



Thanks,



Darryn







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
3
Darryn,

Did you ever find a solution or workaround to this? We just started using projects and it's an issue for us too.

Carson

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Darryn Ralph" <darrynralph@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is there a way other than Time & Expense Entry to book time to Project Jobs?
>
>
>
> A lot of the guys who book their time through MES also work on Projects, so
> it would be so much easier if they could book directly onto Project work
> instead of manually having to add it retrospectively.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Darryn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>