Purchase Advisor: incorrect "Supplier Unit Cost" in "Have I purc

Excellent, Thank you.

Another reason to pass on to our mgmt. to support an upgrade form our 3+ year old version (8.03.305L).

Matt Sweny
Purchasing Manager
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of kchpmn08
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:33 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Purchase Advisor: incorrect "Supplier Unit Cost" in "Have I purchased it before" TAB



We are on 8.03.407C and it works correctly. Shows different prices and different vendors.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>, "Sweny, Matt" <matts@...> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if this problem is fixed in versions greater than 8.03.305L (out current version).
>
> Problem:
> Purchase Advisor
> TAB = “Have I Purchased It Before?”
> Supplier Unit Cost …in the grid displays the same $$$ even when the part was purchased/received different times at different prices on both the PO and Price Lists.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Sweny
> Purchasing Manager
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Karl Dash
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:19 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor
>
>
>
> You know, someone did mention that to me recently but I was busy emptying the swamp and never did look into it further. It's good to know we aren't the only ones.
>
> -Karl
>
> ________________________________
> From: bw2868bond <bwalker@...<mailto:bwalker%40adcocircuits.com>>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 5:23:24 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor
>
>
> Has anyone noticed PA showing incorrect Supplier Unit Cost on the 'Have Ordered Before' grid?
>
> We have several instances where PO for same part on multiple lines, having different costs on lines, when viewed in PA it appears to show cost from first line found and then shows that cost for subsequent lines of the same PO when in fact the PO lines have different costs.
>
> bw
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> This email transmission and any attachments to it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>


________________________________


Disclaimer:
This email transmission and any attachments to it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Has anyone noticed PA showing incorrect Supplier Unit Cost on the 'Have Ordered Before' grid?

We have several instances where PO for same part on multiple lines, having different costs on lines, when viewed in PA it appears to show cost from first line found and then shows that cost for subsequent lines of the same PO when in fact the PO lines have different costs.

bw
You know, someone did mention that to me recently but I was busy emptying the swamp and never did look into it further. It's good to know we aren't the only ones.

-Karl


________________________________
From: bw2868bond <bwalker@...>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 5:23:24 AM
Subject: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor

Â
Has anyone noticed PA showing incorrect Supplier Unit Cost on the 'Have Ordered Before' grid?

We have several instances where PO for same part on multiple lines, having different costs on lines, when viewed in PA it appears to show cost from first line found and then shows that cost for subsequent lines of the same PO when in fact the PO lines have different costs.

bw







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Does anyone know if this problem is fixed in versions greater than 8.03.305L (out current version).

Problem:
Purchase Advisor
TAB = “Have I Purchased It Before?”
Supplier Unit Cost …in the grid displays the same $$$ even when the part was purchased/received different times at different prices on both the PO and Price Lists.

Thanks,

Matt Sweny
Purchasing Manager
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Karl Dash
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:19 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor



You know, someone did mention that to me recently but I was busy emptying the swamp and never did look into it further. It's good to know we aren't the only ones.

-Karl

________________________________
From: bw2868bond <bwalker@...<mailto:bwalker%40adcocircuits.com>>
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 5:23:24 AM
Subject: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor


Has anyone noticed PA showing incorrect Supplier Unit Cost on the 'Have Ordered Before' grid?

We have several instances where PO for same part on multiple lines, having different costs on lines, when viewed in PA it appears to show cost from first line found and then shows that cost for subsequent lines of the same PO when in fact the PO lines have different costs.

bw

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


________________________________


Disclaimer:
This email transmission and any attachments to it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We are on 8.03.407C and it works correctly. Shows different prices and different vendors.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Sweny, Matt" <matts@...> wrote:
>
> Does anyone know if this problem is fixed in versions greater than 8.03.305L (out current version).
>
> Problem:
> Purchase Advisor
> TAB = “Have I Purchased It Before?”
> Supplier Unit Cost …in the grid displays the same $$$ even when the part was purchased/received different times at different prices on both the PO and Price Lists.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Sweny
> Purchasing Manager
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Karl Dash
> Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:19 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor
>
>
>
> You know, someone did mention that to me recently but I was busy emptying the swamp and never did look into it further. It's good to know we aren't the only ones.
>
> -Karl
>
> ________________________________
> From: bw2868bond <bwalker@...<mailto:bwalker%40adcocircuits.com>>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thu, November 19, 2009 5:23:24 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] V8.03.xxx Purchase Advisor
>
>
> Has anyone noticed PA showing incorrect Supplier Unit Cost on the 'Have Ordered Before' grid?
>
> We have several instances where PO for same part on multiple lines, having different costs on lines, when viewed in PA it appears to show cost from first line found and then shows that cost for subsequent lines of the same PO when in fact the PO lines have different costs.
>
> bw
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> Disclaimer:
> This email transmission and any attachments to it are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, your use, forwarding, printing, storing, disseminating, distribution, or copying of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete it from your computer.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>