Sounds like a bug...it should only be suggesting expedite. What version
are you on? Have you checked with support to see if it's a known bug?
Greg
Bill King wrote:
are you on? Have you checked with support to see if it's a known bug?
Greg
Bill King wrote:
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> You are correct that date maintenance will fix the issue for sales
> order demand; but the issue is on items we carry an on-hand minimum
> for and purchase from over seas where we will enter a container
> shipment for. Note: this is only an issue on container shipments for
> non-sales order demand.
>
> Are we the only ones to have this issue?
>
> BILL R. KING
> J&B Industrial Services
> (806).776.4409 Office
> (254).592.4397 Cell
>
> ________________________________
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf Of CharlieSmith
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:11 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: RE: [Vantage] purchase suggestions for product already in transit
>
> MRP is probably making the suggestion because the material is not
> scheduled to arrive on time and MRP wants another order to take care of
> the situation. Evaluate the demand / PO due date situation and make some
> date adjustments to handle it.
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>]
> On Behalf
> Of bking521
> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 10:27 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com><mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] purchase suggestions for product already in transit
>
> Since our go-live 1st of may i have noticed that if we have product in
> transit on a container mrp will make a suggestion for a new purchase
> order. I would expect to see perhaps an expedite suggestion but not a
> new purchase suggestion. We can control this for sales orders by moving
> demand dates to match supply dates but demand created by on-hand min is
> not date tested upfront.
>
> The concern is that product is showing up on the buyer's workbench for
> an unnecessary purchase.
>
> Have others noticed this and if so what measures did you put in place to
> prevent potential errors?
>
> Thanks for your time,
> Bill
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ________________________________
> The information contained in this message is intended solely for the
> individual to whom it is specifically and originally addressed. This
> message and its contents may contain confidential or privileged
> information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any disclosure or distribution, or taking any action in
> reliance on the contents of this information, is strictly prohibited.
> We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting
> software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks
> on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any
> loss or damage caused by software viruses.
>
> This message (including any attachments) is intended only for
> the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and
> may contain information that is non-public, proprietary,
> privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under
> applicable law or may constitute as attorney work product.
> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and
> (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message
> immediately if this is an electronic communication.
>
> Thank you.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>