Quick Poll RE: RE: Running an Updateable BAQ

“What per cent of your users understand indexing- include IT people and ERP system people?”

 

1% (just me).

 

“Does your company use field security or just Menu security”

  

Both, although the vast majority of security is handled through Groups and Menu Security, there are a few places I've had to secure some fields (maybe half a dozen or so).

 

Ernie Lowell

Diba Industries

 

Good Day Chris:

 

            Most of these reports are done for least technical users. Your mix may be different. Does anyone in your warehouse understand file indexing?

 

            OK, quick poll of list server:

                                                 “What per cent of your users understand indexing- include IT people and ERP system people?”

                                                And “ Does your company use field security or just Menu security”

 

For my company:

 

What per cent of your users understand indexing- include IT people and ERP system people?

            Per Cent of user who understand Indexing:   2%

            Per Cent of E9 POWER users who understand indexing: 15%

            If not include IT people and ERP system people:   0.5%, 5.0%

 

Does your company use field security or Menu security”

            Menu

 

           

 

                                                                                                                                                Len

 

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chris Robisch
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 12:19 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] RE: Running an Updateable BAQ

 

 

There's no reason why users, who understand indexing, shouldn't have BAQ/Dashboard capability as long as you're on a version that supports Field Security. A couple of years ago there was a bug in BAQ's where you could see protected field values if they're in a calcuated field.

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 8:46 AM

Subject: [Vantage] RE: Running an Updateable BAQ

 

Good Day Stephen:

 

            Always good to hear from you.

 

            Reason I do not do a dashboard is Company Rules\Politics.

            Reason I do not just create a dashboard is that I do not have rights to dashboard design since I am no longer in IT department, I am in the New Materials Dept.

            There is ‘work around”. I do have access on the test SERVER, so can do there, but then need to get IT to move to Live Account , if they approve, and of course it may not work there. Also, the Test SERVER is often in lock-down mode for IT testing so I cannot use it.

 

            While that is painful to admit, it is probably not unique, and it does bring up the broader topic of WHY can’t a user be given rights to run BAQ’s without right to change\create them? You will agree that we cannot give them rights to change, since they do not use it often and would do unfortunate things by accident, even though well intentioned. Unless you play with BAQ’s daily, any one would make bad mistakes.

 

            Is there a path of my being able to copy the “custom” since they would be identical except for the name of the BAQ? That is, it is a standard custom.

            Can’t there be a BAQ.Tracker with an ‘Execute” command?

 

 

                                                                                                                                    Len

           

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Stephen Edginton
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 8:00 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] RE: Running an Updateable BAQ

 

 

In short not in the ICE framework tools that are provided. Only via a dashboard.

You could make a customisation that called the uBAQ if required but really I don’t see why you would not just create the dashboard and publish that?

 

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Len Hartka
Sent: 07 January 2014 19:00
To: 'vantage@yahoogroups.com'
Subject: [Vantage] Running an Updateable BAQ

 

 

Good Day:

 

RE: Running an Updateable BAQ

 

            Is there any way to run an updateable BAQ without using a dashboard?

 

            I have used Quick-Searches and BAQ-Searches to get BAQ’s to users, but I just tried with an updateable BAQ and it did not work –it just ran as a query.

 

            Could they be run using a UNC path from the Favorites menu tree?

 

                                                                                                                        Len

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Winter, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:48 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

FYI, an updatable BAQ did fix this.

 

Patrick

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Winter, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 11:50
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

Her is a fun one. “Back to the Future – Epicor 9”

 

Vantage 6 my rolling century on the database was 1960.

My conversion to Epicor 9 rolling century on the database is 1930

 

I have found a transaction dated for 2040 which I can’t do the 2 adjustment method you mention.

I can see the transaction with a BAQ I created but can’t run the Inventor y Quantity Adjustment on that date.

As soon as I enter 01/01/30 my Epicor 9 thinks I’m in the 19th century not the 20th.

I will have to Adjustable-BAQ-Hack this one out of the system.

 

Patrick Winter

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Miguel Santillan
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 11 :40
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

We run into this every so often…

 

We do exactly this.

Qty Adjust out of future dated receipt and Qty Adjust back in original date?

 

 

Miguel A. Santill an

Compass Manufacturing Systems

510-661-6666  Office

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Winter, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 9:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

I will give it a try, thanks.

 

Patrick

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cathy
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 11:18
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

I believed I used an Updatable BAQ to change this before.  It is the SysDate that you cannot update.

 

 

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Winter, Patrick
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 9:34 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Updatable BAQ on PartTran.TranDate Field

 

 

I have a PUR-STK transaction from 10/17/08 entered as 10/17/14.

ISSUE: My TimePhase “Running Total” is off.

I’m thinking of creating an Updatable BAQ and changing the PartTran.TRANDATE field to the 2008 receipt date.

Has anyone done this?

How are others handling this?

Qty Adjust out of future dated receipt and Qty Adjust back in original date?

Patrick Winter

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6988 - Release Date: 01/09/14

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.


This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.