Receipt to unapproved PO

Hi,

I reported this issue when we installed Vantage in 2005 (vs6.1) The response I got was - you don't get the printer icon showing to be able to print a PO until the PO is approved. There is an assumption of course that everyone prints PO's.

I consider this a design failure - you should not be able to receipt a PO until the PO has been approved.

Jill Seeman
Information Technology Manager




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when shipping an average cost part from a job. It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit price * number of units. If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction). I expected to see that when you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to Variance but it doesn't. It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.

Any thoughts?
>Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when shipping an average cost part from a job.
> It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit price * number of units.
> If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions
> when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I expected to see that when
> you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to Variance but it doesn't.
>It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.
>
>Any thoughts?

Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average cost on on configurations only.

Mark W.
We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any costs if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for us as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor do I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue. Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation process.

Thanks,
Rick

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
>
> >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit price * number of units.
> > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions
> > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I expected to see that when
> > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to Variance but it doesn't.
> >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.
> >
> >Any thoughts?
>
> Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average cost on on configurations only.
>
> Mark W.
>
Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?



Charlie Smith

Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC

www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
www.2WTech.com







From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of ridgeeng20
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP





We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any costs
if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for us
as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor do
I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
process.

Thanks,
Rick

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
Wonsil <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
>
> >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
price * number of units.
> > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9
doesn't post any transactions
> > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
expected to see that when
> > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to
Variance but it doesn't.
> >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
notes just state that it fixes a report.
> >
> >Any thoughts?
>
> Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran
or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting
Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
cost on on configurations only.
>
> Mark W.
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
>
>
>
> Charlie Smith
>
> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
>
> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> www.2WTech.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of ridgeeng20
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
>
>
>
>
>
> We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
> posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any costs
> if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for us
> as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
> ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor do
> I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
> adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
> it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
> Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
> process.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
> Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
> shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
> price * number of units.
> > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9
> doesn't post any transactions
> > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
> expected to see that when
> > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to
> Variance but it doesn't.
> > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
> notes just state that it fixes a report.
> > >
> > >Any thoughts?
> >
> > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran
> or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
> report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting
> Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
> cost on on configurations only.
> >
> > Mark W.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Check to make sure you have a COSWIP GL Transaction type and it is
flagged as 'always single active revision'.



Charlie Smith

Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC

www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
www.2WTech.com







From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of ridgeeng20
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:18 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP





I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
>
>
>
> Charlie Smith
>
> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
>
> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> www.2WTech.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of ridgeeng20
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
>
>
>
>
>
> We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
> posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any
costs
> if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for
us
> as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
> ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor
do
> I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
> adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
> it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
> Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
> process.
>
> Thanks,
> Rick
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
> Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
> shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
> price * number of units.
> > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that
E9
> doesn't post any transactions
> > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
> expected to see that when
> > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs
to
> Variance but it doesn't.
> > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
> notes just state that it fixes a report.
> > >
> > >Any thoughts?
> >
> > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on
PartTran
> or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
> report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of
Posting
> Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
> cost on on configurations only.
> >
> > Mark W.
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I do and it is..


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> Check to make sure you have a COSWIP GL Transaction type and it is
> flagged as 'always single active revision'.
>
>
>
> Charlie Smith
>
> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
>
> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> www.2WTech.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of ridgeeng20
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:18 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
>
>
>
>
>
> I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@> wrote:
> >
> > Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
> >
> >
> >
> > Charlie Smith
> >
> > Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
> >
> > www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> > www.2WTech.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of ridgeeng20
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
> > posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any
> costs
> > if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for
> us
> > as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
> > ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor
> do
> > I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
> > adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
> > it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
> > Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
> > process.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rick
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
> > Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
> > shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
> > price * number of units.
> > > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that
> E9
> > doesn't post any transactions
> > > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
> > expected to see that when
> > > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs
> to
> > Variance but it doesn't.
> > > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
> > notes just state that it fixes a report.
> > > >
> > > >Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on
> PartTran
> > or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
> > report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of
> Posting
> > Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
> > cost on on configurations only.
> > >
> > > Mark W.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Then it might be a problem with the G/L segments. Try this:

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: 10201MPS

Account Segment Value is not being recognized as Balance Segment.
VERSION: 9.04.503A

STEPS TO DUPLICATE:

* General Ledger > Setup > Account Budget
* Choose an Account to enter to existing Budget
* Error that the Segment is not a balance segment
* General Ledger > General Operations > Chart Tracker
* Choose an Account to view Movement Summary
* No details listed even though Journal Tracker shows the account
being posted to.

RESOLUTION:

* General Ledger > Setup > Chart of Account
* In this case there were 4 Controlled Mandatory Segments
* Chart/Department/Division/ProductLine
* The error in GL Account Budget Entry was pointing to Segment 4.
* Verified the Segments was indeed checked as Include in Balances
* Uncheck the Include in Balances for the Segement
* Save
* Re-check the include in Balances for the Segment
* General Ledger > General Operations > Verify Balances for the
Book tied to that Chart of Account
* They system will now recognize the boxes are checked to include
in balances
* Now able to use in GL Account Budget
* Now able to view the Movement Summary & Details in Chart Tracker
for that account.





Charlie Smith

Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC

www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
www.2WTech.com







From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of ridgeeng20
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 12:23 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP





I do and it is..

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>
> Check to make sure you have a COSWIP GL Transaction type and it is
> flagged as 'always single active revision'.
>
>
>
> Charlie Smith
>
> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
>
> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> www.2WTech.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of ridgeeng20
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:18 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
>
>
>
>
>
> I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@> wrote:
> >
> > Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
> >
> >
> >
> > Charlie Smith
> >
> > Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
> >
> > www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> > www.2WTech.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of ridgeeng20
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
> > posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any
> costs
> > if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for
> us
> > as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
> > ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor
> do
> > I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
> > adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but
otherwise
> > it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
> > Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the
implementation
> > process.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rick
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
> > Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
> > shipping an average cost part from a job.
> > > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory
unit
> > price * number of units.
> > > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears
that
> E9
> > doesn't post any transactions
> > > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
> > expected to see that when
> > > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job
costs
> to
> > Variance but it doesn't.
> > > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but
the
> > notes just state that it fixes a report.
> > > >
> > > >Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on
> PartTran
> > or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
> > report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of
> Posting
> > Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use
average
> > cost on on configurations only.
> > >
> > > Mark W.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We are MTO as well. We ship from jobs and that's when the WIP is relieved.

On Tue Feb 16th, 2010 11:18 AM EST ridgeeng20 wrote:

>I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?
>
>--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@...> wrote:
>>
>> Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
>>
>>
>>
>> Charlie Smith
>>
>> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
>>
>> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
>> www.2WTech.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
>> Of ridgeeng20
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
>> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
>> posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any costs
>> if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for us
>> as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
>> ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor do
>> I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
>> adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
>> it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
>> Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
>> process.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rick
>>
>> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
>> Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
>> shipping an average cost part from a job.
>> > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
>> price * number of units.
>> > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9
>> doesn't post any transactions
>> > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
>> expected to see that when
>> > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to
>> Variance but it doesn't.
>> > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
>> notes just state that it fixes a report.
>> > >
>> > >Any thoughts?
>> >
>> > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran
>> or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
>> report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting
>> Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
>> cost on on configurations only.
>> >
>> > Mark W.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>>
>
>
What version are you on?

Do you do partial shipments? Based on my testing, the WIP is not being relieved even after closing the job.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
> We are MTO as well. We ship from jobs and that's when the WIP is relieved.
>
> On Tue Feb 16th, 2010 11:18 AM EST ridgeeng20 wrote:
>
> >I am unsure. What is the difference? How can I tell?
> >
> >--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "CharlieSmith" <CSmith@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Which posting rules are you using, the standard or the extended?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Charlie Smith
> >>
> >> Smith Business Services / 2W Technologies LLC
> >>
> >> www.vistaconsultant.com <http://www.vistaconsultant.com/> /
> >> www.2WTech.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> >> Of ridgeeng20
> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 10:47 AM
> >> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> >> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> We are not seeing it on the WIP/RECON and it does not appear to be
> >> posting anything to the GL. Essentially, it is not recognizing any costs
> >> if there is no inventory history (which will largely be the case for us
> >> as we are a MTO organization). Basically I can not see where the WIP
> >> ever gets relieved. I don't see it in the COS accounts in the GL nor do
> >> I see it in the variance accounts after the Capture. If I do a cost
> >> adjustment to the part then it creates a COS transaction but otherwise
> >> it does nothing. I can't imagine that this hasn't been an issue.
> >> Thankfully we are not live and are very early on in the implementation
> >> process.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Rick
> >>
> >> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> , Mark
> >> Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
> >> shipping an average cost part from a job.
> >> > > It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit
> >> price * number of units.
> >> > > If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9
> >> doesn't post any transactions
> >> > > when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction) . I
> >> expected to see that when
> >> > > you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to
> >> Variance but it doesn't.
> >> > >It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the
> >> notes just state that it fixes a report.
> >> > >
> >> > >Any thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Are you not seeing the records in the database doing a BAQ on PartTran
> >> or are you not seeing it PartTransaction History or not in Wip/Recon
> >> report? Early E9 WIP/Recon dropped transactions and a new set of Posting
> >> Rules/One-offs fixed it for us. We're still on 504B and we use average
> >> cost on on configurations only.
> >> >
> >> > Mark W.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >>
> >
> >
>
>What version are you on?

9.04.504B

>>Do you do partial shipments?

Yes.

> Based on my testing, the WIP is not being relieved even after closing the job.

Hmm. Are your Product Groups assigned to the job? Do you have your default accounts set up properly in your Company setup?

Mark W.
We had the same problem (we are last cost) shipping from job - not inventory. SCR 70477 - Epicor provided a patch that fixed it and then released 505C that should have fixed it for everyone. Still same problem, however, if you create new product groups. Works for existing product groups. I would recommend upgrade to 505C to cure ills related to this issue. We haven't seen other issues with this upgrade.

Best.

Mike

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "ridgeeng20" <ridgeeng20@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when shipping an average cost part from a job. It appears the COS is being generated based on the inventory unit price * number of units. If you have a non-stock part that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions when you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction). I expected to see that when you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs to Variance but it doesn't. It appears 505c does something in relation to this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
Are you standard costing your parts or using a different method?

I am using the EPICOR training database right now actually (version 505a). I do have a product group on the job (assuming that is coming over from the part) It appears that the product groups that I am using (they are EPICOR defaults) do have GL accounts associated with them.

The COS side of the MFG-CUS transactions simply do not have any costs associated with them in the INV/WIP Recon nor do they transfer costs to the GL during the Capture. The MFG-CUS transaction shows up in the job tracker with $0 of costs.

If I do a cost adjustment for the part I am making to reflect an average cost, it then applies that rate * # shipped to come up with a COS when I do a MFG-CUS. (The fact that this works properly after doing a cost adjustment ot the part makes me believe it isn't a GL/Product Group issue). This appears to be a problem when you have no cost history for a part or you never move the part to the inventory tables (which is very common in an MTO environment)

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@...> wrote:
>
>
> >What version are you on?
>
> 9.04.504B
>
> >>Do you do partial shipments?
>
> Yes.
>
> > Based on my testing, the WIP is not being relieved even after closing the job.
>
> Hmm. Are your Product Groups assigned to the job? Do you have your default accounts set up properly in your Company setup?
>
> Mark W.
>
Since when were you able to receive to an unapproved PO. Just did on 505C

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
doily2oo5
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:11 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP




We had the same problem (we are last cost) shipping from job - not
inventory. SCR 70477 - Epicor provided a patch that fixed it and then
released 505C that should have fixed it for everyone. Still same problem,
however, if you create new product groups. Works for existing product
groups. I would recommend upgrade to 505C to cure ills related to this
issue. We haven't seen other issues with this upgrade.

Best.

Mike

--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com,
"ridgeeng20" <ridgeeng20@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when shipping
an average cost part from a job. It appears the COS is being generated based
on the inventory unit price * number of units. If you have a non-stock part
that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions when
you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction). I expected to see
that when you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job costs
to Variance but it doesn't. It appears 505c does something in relation to
this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.
>
> Any thoughts?
>







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
You can in version 8.0...







M. Manasa Reddy

manasa@... <mailto:manasa@...>

800.852.2325

630.806.2000 ofc

630.806.2001 fax

www.weldcoa.com

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of advantage
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 2:45 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Receipt to unapproved PO





Since when were you able to receive to an unapproved PO. Just did on
505C

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
doily2oo5
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 3:11 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Epicor 9 - WIP

We had the same problem (we are last cost) shipping from job - not
inventory. SCR 70477 - Epicor provided a patch that fixed it and then
released 505C that should have fixed it for everyone. Still same
problem,
however, if you create new product groups. Works for existing product
groups. I would recommend upgrade to 505C to cure ills related to this
issue. We haven't seen other issues with this upgrade.

Best.

Mike

--- In vantage@yahoogroups <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> .com,
"ridgeeng20" <ridgeeng20@...> wrote:
>
> Has anyone come across the issue of WIP not being relieved when
shipping
an average cost part from a job. It appears the COS is being generated
based
on the inventory unit price * number of units. If you have a non-stock
part
that has no history, it appears that E9 doesn't post any transactions
when
you ship a part (because there it is a $0 transaction). I expected to
see
that when you closed the job it would book the full amount of the job
costs
to Variance but it doesn't. It appears 505c does something in relation
to
this problem but the notes just state that it fixes a report.
>
> Any thoughts?
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The capability exist in Vantage 6.0 as well. We have written a BAM to warn
and send an e-mail when it happens.

Allen Tucker
IT Manager
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.

atucker@...


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
And you can do it on Epicor 9 as well. We have sent out several BPMs that prevent this from happening to other users on this group which have requested it

--- On Tue, 2/16/10, Allen Tucker <atucker@...> wrote:


From: Allen Tucker <atucker@...>
Subject: [Vantage] Receipt to unapproved PO
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, February 16, 2010, 3:55 PM


Â



The capability exist in Vantage 6.0 as well. We have written a BAM to warn
and send an e-mail when it happens.

Allen Tucker
IT Manager
Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.

atucker@espey. com

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]











[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I recommend you upgrade - you'll have to at some point anyway - and see if your problem goes away. Again, 505C works for existing product groups but not for new ones. That problem is being worked by Epicor.

Mike

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "ridgeeng20" <ridgeeng20@...> wrote:
>
> Are you standard costing your parts or using a different method?
>
> I am using the EPICOR training database right now actually (version 505a). I do have a product group on the job (assuming that is coming over from the part) It appears that the product groups that I am using (they are EPICOR defaults) do have GL accounts associated with them.
>
> The COS side of the MFG-CUS transactions simply do not have any costs associated with them in the INV/WIP Recon nor do they transfer costs to the GL during the Capture. The MFG-CUS transaction shows up in the job tracker with $0 of costs.
>
> If I do a cost adjustment for the part I am making to reflect an average cost, it then applies that rate * # shipped to come up with a COS when I do a MFG-CUS. (The fact that this works properly after doing a cost adjustment ot the part makes me believe it isn't a GL/Product Group issue). This appears to be a problem when you have no cost history for a part or you never move the part to the inventory tables (which is very common in an MTO environment)
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Mark Wonsil <mark_wonsil@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > >What version are you on?
> >
> > 9.04.504B
> >
> > >>Do you do partial shipments?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > > Based on my testing, the WIP is not being relieved even after closing the job.
> >
> > Hmm. Are your Product Groups assigned to the job? Do you have your default accounts set up properly in your Company setup?
> >
> > Mark W.
> >
>