I have open items from 2003-2007 that could never be cleared from the
report in 6.0;
though the report showed them as pending inspection, the part tran.
history showed that they have moved beyond
this point and onto stock or subcontracting. For whatever reason, they
somehow go disconnected ......so to speak.
They also did not show up in the inspection pending module, just the
report.
With 8.03.406 they showed up again, and we'll be able to clear them, but
not sure what the steps will be to offset
any inventory transaction values they have attached to them.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of nweining@...
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:37 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Reconcile Inspection Pending Report to GL
Hi,
Does anyone know what would be the reasons for this not to reconcile?
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message, including attachments. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
report in 6.0;
though the report showed them as pending inspection, the part tran.
history showed that they have moved beyond
this point and onto stock or subcontracting. For whatever reason, they
somehow go disconnected ......so to speak.
They also did not show up in the inspection pending module, just the
report.
With 8.03.406 they showed up again, and we'll be able to clear them, but
not sure what the steps will be to offset
any inventory transaction values they have attached to them.
_____
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of nweining@...
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 1:37 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Reconcile Inspection Pending Report to GL
Hi,
Does anyone know what would be the reasons for this not to reconcile?
NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail message, including attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of this message, including attachments. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]