No way 6GB would be enough if that is how many concurrent
connections to Vantage you would have. I personally would go for
about 18 with that many users. Not so sure I would put that many on
a single server either.
connections to Vantage you would have. I personally would go for
about 18 with that many users. Not so sure I would put that many on
a single server either.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Ken Taylor <ktaylorv@...> wrote:
>
> When you say resource, I imagine RAM is one of them. Would 6gb be
enough? Also, is there a maximum amount of users that can connect
via TS before it starts dragging? Thanks.
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Michael McWilliams <mmcwilliams22@...>
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:51:28 AM
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: remote users
>
>
> Vantage runs faster for our remote users on Windows 2003 Terminal
> Server than it does locally. Just make sure you have a ton of
> resources for the Terminal Servers
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, "Zach Jumper" <zjumper@ > wrote:
> >
> > Terminal Servers are a good choice. That's what I have users
use
> when
> > they are out of the office.
> >
> >
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com]
On
> Behalf
> > Of Ken Taylor
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 12:36 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
> > Subject: [Vantage] remote users
> >
> >
> >
> > Something off subject:
> >
> > Is anyone out there working with Vantage and a slew of remote
> users? We
> > are looking at 50-60 remote users on MPLS network with T1
> connections
> > between sites. Just wondering how you are dealing with speed
issues
> > without breaking the bank.
> > Also, what's a good solution where the number of local users is
> about
> > the same as a remote site. Can Vantage be run on 2 synchronized
> servers?
> >
> >
> > Your thought will be appreciated. Thanks.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>