Larry,
In 6.1 you can set up global alerts that warn various
departments/people (via check boxes) when an action is taken on the
DMR. This feature works well at MSM. The Non-Conformance /
Inspection Processing generates the DMR; sending an email to
purchasing and quality administrator. QA sends DMR copy to supplier
as for corrective action and Purchasing decides to Debit or not;
sending an email to A/P who reviews and pulls in the Debit Memo and
print a form that we have created that can be sent to supplier to
offset the $ of the original invoice) or A/P does nothing if there is
no debit required. We also re-open the PO line if it is closed and
add pcs.
A word of caution when generating a SUBCONTRACT DMR that was created
by a non-conformance.....costs to the job are extremely INACCURATE.
5.2 has similar problems.
MSM has disabled its non-conformace mod while we have Epicor's
custom programming department develop a solution.
HTH,
Jill Pleau
Mid-State Machine Products
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Larry Barriere <larrybarriere@...>
wrote:
______________
In 6.1 you can set up global alerts that warn various
departments/people (via check boxes) when an action is taken on the
DMR. This feature works well at MSM. The Non-Conformance /
Inspection Processing generates the DMR; sending an email to
purchasing and quality administrator. QA sends DMR copy to supplier
as for corrective action and Purchasing decides to Debit or not;
sending an email to A/P who reviews and pulls in the Debit Memo and
print a form that we have created that can be sent to supplier to
offset the $ of the original invoice) or A/P does nothing if there is
no debit required. We also re-open the PO line if it is closed and
add pcs.
A word of caution when generating a SUBCONTRACT DMR that was created
by a non-conformance.....costs to the job are extremely INACCURATE.
5.2 has similar problems.
MSM has disabled its non-conformace mod while we have Epicor's
custom programming department develop a solution.
HTH,
Jill Pleau
Mid-State Machine Products
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Larry Barriere <larrybarriere@...>
wrote:
>the items get inspected. I know internal problem)
> We need to know how everyone is doing a return to vendor.
> 1, Purchase depart create a PO
> 2, Shipping Receiving receive the PO Line to a inspection area
> 3, QA inspect the items. (We sometime take a week or more before
> 3, QA reject the items.that it has been received.
> Now how do you proceed?
> Purchasing doesn't know that the items has been rejected. They know
> We still need the items.really didn't receive the items (we rejected them)
> Can the purchasing department reopen the original line since we
> Should the purchasing department create a new PO or line?______________________________________________________________________
> How does account payable know when to pay for the items?
>
> Larry Barriere
> barriere@...
> W 603-626-3160
>
>
>
>
>
______________
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>