I hear you Rob...strangely enough it appears that in our system for
whatever the reason (unless its so rare we haven't noticed it) it is
respecting precedence relationships..but I understand many things could
effect that. We DO see what you do however, and that is too many
unacceptable dates (such as early), when capacity is available to
minimize WIP (and yes the minimize WIP box is checked). We are still
battling with those guys over the literally thousands of dollars we
spent in consulting fees with them only to prove what you just said...
it was F'n broke!!
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
FAX: 715-284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Robert Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:09 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Rob
SCR59236 (scheduled for fix in 408, twice delayed already).
Right now the global (randomly but significantly - 3/4 of our jobs are
impacted daily) doesn't respect the OP to OP defined relationship
(example finish to start serial processing is our norm).
We find up to 75% of our jobs have OPs scheduled out of sequence. This
is brutal on material planning when materials are tied to the
mischeduled OPs:
(Real) Example:
OpSeq OpCode OpQty QtyCmpl setup hrs run hrs start date reporting type
5 9510 50 0 0 0.01 8/27/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
10 3100 50 0 0.08 0.35 6/8/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
20 4700 50 0 0 0.42 6/24/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
30 5200 50 0 0 0.83 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
40 3900 50 0 0 0.42 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
50 9100 50 0 0 0.01 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
The required date of this job is 9/4. Any materials associated w/ OPs
10-50 have requirement dates much sooner than really needed.
Truly THE worst finite scheduler I've ever had to put up with in 29
years of manufacturing. We've been live a year and are still waiting
(after wasting months on just 'proving' the bug existed).
Since Epicor clearly has not comittment to quality, we've decided to
eliminate dependance and go massively kanban where ever possible.
I'll be satisfied when we can run this business with a spreadsheet,
quickbooks and visual signals.
Rob
________________________________
From: Rob Bucek <rbucek@... <mailto:rbucek%40dsmfg.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:39:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Rob,
Whats the SCR details on that global scheduling bug fix in 408?
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
FAX: 715-284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)
____________ _________ _________ __
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On
Behalf
Of Robert Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:38 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Mark,
If you upgrade, I'd skip 404 entirely (disgustingly buggy) and at least
go to 405a (also some bugs - but liveable ones at least for us).
We've not proceeded to 407 as many of the things I've read about it here
would not be liveable for us. 408 is our goal as it is to contain an SCR
fix for us of a big bug in the global scheduler... Even then I suspect
we'll await a 408a or b (and not waste time being guinea pigs).
Rob
____________ _________ _________ __
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com <mailto:mjfw2003% 40yahoo.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:02:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Thanks, we are on 403A so looks like an upgrade is needed
whatever the reason (unless its so rare we haven't noticed it) it is
respecting precedence relationships..but I understand many things could
effect that. We DO see what you do however, and that is too many
unacceptable dates (such as early), when capacity is available to
minimize WIP (and yes the minimize WIP box is checked). We are still
battling with those guys over the literally thousands of dollars we
spent in consulting fees with them only to prove what you just said...
it was F'n broke!!
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
FAX: 715-284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg.com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Robert Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 3:09 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Rob
SCR59236 (scheduled for fix in 408, twice delayed already).
Right now the global (randomly but significantly - 3/4 of our jobs are
impacted daily) doesn't respect the OP to OP defined relationship
(example finish to start serial processing is our norm).
We find up to 75% of our jobs have OPs scheduled out of sequence. This
is brutal on material planning when materials are tied to the
mischeduled OPs:
(Real) Example:
OpSeq OpCode OpQty QtyCmpl setup hrs run hrs start date reporting type
5 9510 50 0 0 0.01 8/27/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
10 3100 50 0 0.08 0.35 6/8/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
20 4700 50 0 0 0.42 6/24/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
30 5200 50 0 0 0.83 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
40 3900 50 0 0 0.42 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
50 9100 50 0 0 0.01 7/22/2009 0:00 Time and Quantity
The required date of this job is 9/4. Any materials associated w/ OPs
10-50 have requirement dates much sooner than really needed.
Truly THE worst finite scheduler I've ever had to put up with in 29
years of manufacturing. We've been live a year and are still waiting
(after wasting months on just 'proving' the bug existed).
Since Epicor clearly has not comittment to quality, we've decided to
eliminate dependance and go massively kanban where ever possible.
I'll be satisfied when we can run this business with a spreadsheet,
quickbooks and visual signals.
Rob
________________________________
From: Rob Bucek <rbucek@... <mailto:rbucek%40dsmfg.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 1:39:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Rob,
Whats the SCR details on that global scheduling bug fix in 408?
Rob Bucek
Manufacturing Engineer
PH: 715-284-5376 ext 311
FAX: 715-284-4084
<http://www.dsmfg com/>
(Click the logo to view our site)
____________ _________ _________ __
From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On
Behalf
Of Robert Brown
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 11:38 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Mark,
If you upgrade, I'd skip 404 entirely (disgustingly buggy) and at least
go to 405a (also some bugs - but liveable ones at least for us).
We've not proceeded to 407 as many of the things I've read about it here
would not be liveable for us. 408 is our goal as it is to contain an SCR
fix for us of a big bug in the global scheduler... Even then I suspect
we'll await a 408a or b (and not waste time being guinea pigs).
Rob
____________ _________ _________ __
From: Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@yahoo. com <mailto:mjfw2003% 40yahoo.com> >
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com <mailto:vantage% 40yahoogroups. com>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 9:02:17 AM
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
Thanks, we are on 403A so looks like an upgrade is needed
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, Nigel Kerley <nigel.kerley@ johnhinde. com> wrote:
From: Nigel Kerley <nigel.kerley@ johnhinde. com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Sales Kits Not Crediting AR Clearing Account
To: vantage@yahoogroups .com
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 8:44 AM
Hi Mark,
I think this was an issue in earlier versions of 8.03.400. We're on 406a
and it seems to be working ok for us.
Nigel.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups .com, Mark Wagner <mjfw2003@.. .> wrote:
>
> Our A/R Clearing is being debited when we ship but that same amount
does not clear when we invoice. I have reviewed transactions and found
this common problem is linked to Sales Kits. Has anyone else experienced
this and is there an account setup somewhere that I may have missed?
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]