Smart!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Kevin Simon <simstrak@...> wrote:
> **
>
>
> You could also affect the searches if you replace the standard search with
> a
> BAQ search, where your criteria is based upon CUR-PLANT.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of
> John Driggers
> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:56 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] RE: Security within Plants of one company for E9
>
> I don't know how embedded you are with your current configuration, but my
> first instinct would be to slice them into different companies. (Assuming
> it won't mess with your financials and such in an unacceptable way.)
>
> Actually, I think you could do this pretty easily with a couple BPMs. You'd
> need two method directives for each entity (PO,SO,etc) you want to
> restrict.
> On Update: Tag the record with the appropriate plant and cancel the update
> if they somehow managed to open a record from the wrong plant.
> On GetByID: Cancel the call if the plant on the record doesn't match the
> current plant.
>
> That wouldn't stop things from showing up in lists when you search, but it
> would prevent people from opening/editing objects from other plants. You
> may end up needing to wire up a few other methods as well, but you get the
> idea. As long as you keep your security plant-based and don't try anything
> more exotic, you should be able to wrangle this without creating anything
> too crazy.
>
> Probably...
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Manasa Reddy <manasa@...> wrote:
>
> > **
>
> >
> >
> > I agree...but I wanted to throw it out there to see the
> response...thanks,
> > Vic!
> >
> >
> > M. Manasa Reddy
> > manasa@...<mailto:manasa@...>
> > 630.806.2000 x1515
> >
> > Ex scientia, vera
> > ________________________________
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of Vic Drecchio
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 3:10 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [Vantage] RE: Security within Plants of one company for E9
> >
> >
> > Yikes. I can give some severely creative thoughts.....but to lock down
> > certain PO/SO/Job/Part records so only certain security groups can see
> them
> > is doable. Flag a UD field in each respectable header record, have a
> > customized SO/PO/Part screen for each Plant and change the search button
> to
> > use a custom BAQ search to filter only parts/SOs/POs "in this plant
> > security group".
> >
> > Depending on how many secure plants you have per company, I can see this
> > as being a nightmare to implement, manage and support, however.
> >
> > From: Manasa Reddy
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:01 PM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> >
> > Subject: [Vantage] RE: Security within Plants of one company for E9
> >
> > I take it no one knows or has any ideas what I am asking for? Or everyone
> > is busy because it is a Monday and end of month! Which I COMPLETELY
> > understand....
> >
> > I'll still wait just in case....
> >
> > M. Manasa Reddy
> > mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com<mailto:mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com>
> > 630.806.2000 x1515
> >
> > Ex scientia, vera
> > ________________________________
> > From: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com [mailto:mailto:vantage%
> > 40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Manasa Reddy
> > Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 9:58 AM
> > To: mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Security within Plants of one company for E9
> >
> > The question is we have multiple companies but each represents a large
> > firm ( similar to the large children of GE, all large different
> productions
> > groups). Within on COMPANY we have some so large they have multiple
> plants,
> > can security be placed for each plant to prevent displaying the
> SO/PO/Parts
> > from another plant?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > M. Manasa Reddy
> > mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com<mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com><mailto:mailto
> > :manasa%40weldcoa.com<mailto:manasa%40weldcoa.com>>
> > 630.806.2000 x1515
> >
> > Ex scientia, vera
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 2012.0.1901 / Virus Database: 2109/4776 - Release Date: 01/30/12
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> *John Driggers*
> *High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
> *
> *:: 904.962.2887*
> *:: waffqle@...*
> *:: NO FAXES*
>
> *
>
> *
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
--
*John Driggers*
*High End Dev, System Design, Profit Drinking
*
*:: 904.962.2887*
*:: waffqle@...*
*:: NO FAXES*
*
*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]