Based on my testing you CAN delete operations & renumber. The only
constraint is don't use the "Resequence" command. If you delete and
renumber manually you should be ok. At least on the two trials I did it
worked out ok....
Rick Joslin
V-S Industries
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:29:02 -0500
From: "Kathy Hambleton" <kbh@...>
Subject: RE: Re: Serious Bug in Patch 305 - Part Maint.
Same here!
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bruton [mailto:bob@...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:40 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Serious Bug in Patch 305 - Part Maint.
I've had the same problem. I've also seen negative sequence numbers. Don't
delete sequences. Don't renumber. Sure would like to know when the fix is
supposed to be out. I've got some really messed up BOMs that I can't seem
to fix.
Bob Bruton
Entek Corp.
We have hit the same problem you are having with the 305 patch. In fact I
have already been in touch with Vantage Support about this. They tell me
that patch 307 is suppose to fix this. When they tried to duplicate the
problem there, they were unable to. Then she said she was running patch 307
not released to the public
yet.
James Piper
Meco Inc
Paris, IL
constraint is don't use the "Resequence" command. If you delete and
renumber manually you should be ok. At least on the two trials I did it
worked out ok....
Rick Joslin
V-S Industries
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 14:29:02 -0500
From: "Kathy Hambleton" <kbh@...>
Subject: RE: Re: Serious Bug in Patch 305 - Part Maint.
Same here!
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Bruton [mailto:bob@...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:40 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Serious Bug in Patch 305 - Part Maint.
I've had the same problem. I've also seen negative sequence numbers. Don't
delete sequences. Don't renumber. Sure would like to know when the fix is
supposed to be out. I've got some really messed up BOMs that I can't seem
to fix.
Bob Bruton
Entek Corp.
We have hit the same problem you are having with the 305 patch. In fact I
have already been in touch with Vantage Support about this. They tell me
that patch 307 is suppose to fix this. When they tried to duplicate the
problem there, they were unable to. Then she said she was running patch 307
not released to the public
yet.
James Piper
Meco Inc
Paris, IL
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Todd Caughey" <caugheyt@h...> wrote:
> Since applying patch 305 last weekend we have encountered further
serious problems in Engineering Workbench and the maintenance of Part
BOMs. At patch 211 there was an issue with deleting operations and
resequencing (thus re-using a oper sequence number) which caused in
infinite loop on part check-in and the PC would hang. The workaround
was to not resequence or re-use a sequence number.
>
> Now in 305 we can not delete operations at all. The appear to
delete but when the part is checked-in but if it is checked out again
or examined in part tracker all the deleted sequences are back and
added to the end of operations AND renumbered relative to the last
sequence number that was there even if it was a deleted one. If we
had sequences 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70 and we deleted 40 & 50 (and
without resequencing) we should see 10, 20, 30, 60, 70 but the part
comes back as 10, 20, 30, 60, 70, 80, 90 with 80 & 90 being the two
deleted operations. We we had deleted 50 thru 70 they would come
back as 80-100.
>
> In short, there is no way to delete an operation and if we try to
the part's BOM gets seriously messed up. Support is aware of this
(SCR 5292 and former SCR 4608) but due to the seriousness of the
issue and not having seen it mentioned much here I figured it is
something other sites might be interested in knowing about.
Especially if contemplating applying patch 305. Perhaps others at
this patch level are seeing different symptoms which could assist
development in getting this fixed as quickly as possible.
>
> At the moment our only workaround is to replace operations to be
deleted with a bogus operation number called "DELETED OPER" as a sort
of place holder and then take it out when the job is created.
>
> -