Server configuration

system · March 10, 2011, 4:46pm

In theory it should not cause any problems. In practice you may want to take a look at partitioning the applications into something akin to Parallels Virtuoso Containers so that no one of the servers can monopolize the single systems resources and so that you minimize the possibility of a single point of failure.

Regards,

Michael

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/

On Mar 10, 2011, at 5:11 AM, michael.hutcheson@... wrote:

> If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would this cause problems?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
> >
> > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Blake Clemens
> >
> > IT Systems Engineer
> >
> > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> >
> > (800) 360-2364 x132
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of michael.hutcheson@...
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> >
> > Recommended Server Configuration
> > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> > with Server 1 or
> > other Epicor application server)
> >
> > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Vantage 8.03.406
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · March 10, 2011, 5:05am

Hello,

What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is recommended: This seems a little over kill though.

Recommended Server Configuration
Â• Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
Â• Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
Â• Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared with Server 1 or
other Epicor application server)

Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?

Regards,

Michael

Vantage 8.03.406

system · March 10, 2011, 8:08am

We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.

Thanks,

Blake Clemens

IT Systems Engineer

Delmarva Millwork Corporation

(800) 360-2364 x132

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of michael.hutcheson@...
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration

Hello,

What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
recommended: This seems a little over kill though.

Recommended Server Configuration
* Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
* Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
* Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
with Server 1 or
other Epicor application server)

Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?

Regards,

Michael

Vantage 8.03.406

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · March 10, 2011, 8:11am

If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would this cause problems?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
>
> We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of michael.hutcheson@...
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
>
> Recommended Server Configuration
> * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> with Server 1 or
> other Epicor application server)
>
> Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Vantage 8.03.406
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

system · March 10, 2011, 8:21am

How many users are you supporting?

We ran about 40 users, and with very heavy SC usage. We were running it all
on one server with no issues. Epicor, SC, IIs, etc.

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, michael.hutcheson@... <
michael.hutcheson@...> wrote:

>
>
> If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would this
> cause problems?
>
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
> >
> > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Blake Clemens
> >
> > IT Systems Engineer
> >
> > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> >
> > (800) 360-2364 x132
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > Of michael.hutcheson@...
>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> >
> > Recommended Server Configuration
> > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> > with Server 1 or
> > other Epicor application server)
> >
> > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Vantage 8.03.406
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · March 10, 2011, 8:38am

I guess that would depend on the size of your server and how heavily you
plan on using SC & SQL.

Thanks,

Blake Clemens

IT Systems Engineer

Delmarva Millwork Corporation

(800) 360-2364 x132

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of michael.hutcheson@...
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:11 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Server configuration

If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would
this cause problems?

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:

>
> We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf

> Of michael.hutcheson@...
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
>
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
>
> Recommended Server Configuration
> * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> with Server 1 or
> other Epicor application server)
>
> Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> Vantage 8.03.406
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · March 10, 2011, 8:42am

We are going to implement Kronos time and managment software so Service Connect will need to talk to a biz server. The progress database is currently 22GB and its for approx 100 users.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@...> wrote:
>
> I guess that would depend on the size of your server and how heavily you
> plan on using SC & SQL.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Blake Clemens
>
> IT Systems Engineer
>
> Delmarva Millwork Corporation
>
> (800) 360-2364 x132
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of michael.hutcheson@...
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:11 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Server configuration
>
>
>
>
>
> If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would
> this cause problems?
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@> wrote:
> >
> > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Blake Clemens
> >
> > IT Systems Engineer
> >
> > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> >
> > (800) 360-2364 x132
> >
> > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > Of michael.hutcheson@
> > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> >
> > Recommended Server Configuration
> > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> > with Server 1 or
> > other Epicor application server)
> >
> > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Vantage 8.03.406
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

system · March 10, 2011, 8:44am

We are going to implement Kronos time and managment software so Service Connect
will need to talk to a biz server. The progress database is currently 22GB and
its for approx 100 users.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Waffqle <waffqle@...> wrote:
>
> How many users are you supporting?
>
> We ran about 40 users, and with very heavy SC usage. We were running it all
> on one server with no issues. Epicor, SC, IIs, etc.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, michael.hutcheson@... <
> michael.hutcheson@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined, would this
> > cause problems?
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@> wrote:
> > >
> > > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Blake Clemens
> > >
> > > IT Systems Engineer
> > >
> > > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> > >
> > > (800) 360-2364 x132
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> > > Of michael.hutcheson@
> >
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below setup is
> > > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> > >
> > > Recommended Server Configuration
> > > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate: shared
> > > with Server 1 or
> > > other Epicor application server)
> > >
> > > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > Vantage 8.03.406
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

system · March 10, 2011, 10:37am

Good Day:

What version? In general all responses should indicate what
version you are on.

Outlook has "Signatures" ( tools >> Options >> Mail Format) that
you can quickly paste.

Sun went live on 11/29
on Epicor 9, 9.05.601B SQL-Unidata
Sun was previously on M2K (Manage-2000) 7.0 SP 5 (Informix)

len.hartka@...

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of michael.hutcheson@...
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:44 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Server configuration

We are going to implement Kronos time and managment software so Service
Connect
will need to talk to a biz server. The progress database is currently
22GB and
its for approx 100 users.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
Waffqle <waffqle@...> wrote:

>
> How many users are you supporting?
>
> We ran about 40 users, and with very heavy SC usage. We were running

it all

> on one server with no issues. Epicor, SC, IIs, etc.
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, michael.hutcheson@... <
> michael.hutcheson@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined,

would this

> > cause problems?
> >
> >
> > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,

"Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@> wrote:

> > >
> > > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Blake Clemens
> > >
> > > IT Systems Engineer
> > >
> > > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> > >
> > > (800) 360-2364 x132
> > >
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>

[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf

> > > Of michael.hutcheson@
> >
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below

setup is

> > > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> > >
> > > Recommended Server Configuration
> > > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate:

shared

> > > with Server 1 or
> > > other Epicor application server)
> > >
> > > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > Vantage 8.03.406
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · March 10, 2011, 11:46am

Vantage 8.03.406 \ Service Connect 8.3

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Len Hartka" <len.hartka@...> wrote:
>
> Good Day:
>
> What version? In general all responses should indicate what
> version you are on.
>
>
> Outlook has "Signatures" ( tools >> Options >> Mail Format) that
> you can quickly paste.
>
> Sun went live on 11/29
> on Epicor 9, 9.05.601B SQL-Unidata
> Sun was previously on M2K (Manage-2000) 7.0 SP 5 (Informix)
>
>
>
> len.hartka@...
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of michael.hutcheson@...
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 8:44 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Vantage] Re: Server configuration
>
>
>
>
> We are going to implement Kronos time and managment software so Service
> Connect
> will need to talk to a biz server. The progress database is currently
> 22GB and
> its for approx 100 users.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> Waffqle <waffqle@> wrote:
> >
> > How many users are you supporting?
> >
> > We ran about 40 users, and with very heavy SC usage. We were running
> it all
> > on one server with no issues. Epicor, SC, IIs, etc.
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:11 AM, michael.hutcheson@ <
> > michael.hutcheson@> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I had one server with Service Connect, SQL and IIS combined,
> would this
> > > cause problems?
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
> "Blake Clemens" <blake.clemens@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > We have ours set up like this. But we can justify running SQL
> > > > independently because we also use it to run Sharepoint.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Blake Clemens
> > > >
> > > > IT Systems Engineer
> > > >
> > > > Delmarva Millwork Corporation
> > > >
> > > > (800) 360-2364 x132
> > > >
> > > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
> Behalf
> > > > Of michael.hutcheson@
> > >
> > > > Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:05 AM
> > > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> > > > Subject: [Vantage] Server configuration
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > What is the best server setup when implenting Service Connect? We
> > > > currently have Vantage running on its own server with a Progress
> > > > backend. I was going to install Service Connect and SQL on another
> > > > server and leave it at that. However, I was reading the below
> setup is
> > > > recommended: This seems a little over kill though.
> > > >
> > > > Recommended Server Configuration
> > > > * Server 1: Epicor Service Connect
> > > > * Server 2: Microsoft SQL Server
> > > > * Server 3: Microsoft IIS for Epicor Web services (Alternate:
> shared
> > > > with Server 1 or
> > > > other Epicor application server)
> > > >
> > > > Does anybody else have service connect setup like the above?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > Vantage 8.03.406
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail or at 410-472-2900 and then delete the message without using, disseminating, or copying this message or any portion thereof. With e-mail communications you are urged to protect against viruses.
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>