Service Connect Condition

system · February 28, 2009, 1:21pm

Woo hoo! I just guessed on that one... J

--

Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix

bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Daniel Laidig
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:52 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition

thanks, that did the trick.

--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Brian W. Spolarich <bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com> > wrote:
From: Brian W. Spolarich <bspolarich@...
<mailto:bspolarich%40advancedphotonix.com> >
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:32 PM

How about this approach? Use a conditional functoid as you suggest,

setting its default condition to Number01 (e.g.

/msg/req/dta/ GetByIDResponse/ result/PartDataS et/PartSubs/ Number01) -

just link it on the left to the default value if the checkbox isn't

checked.

Add an alternative whose condition expression is Checkbox01 (e.g.

/msg:msg/msg: req/msg:dta/ ext_GetByIDRespo nse:GetByIDRespo
nse/ext_GetByID

Response:result/ PartDataSet/ Part/Checkbox01) and whose value
expression

is Number02 (e.g.

/msg:msg/msg: req/msg:dta/ ext_GetByIDRespo nse:GetByIDRespo
nse/ext_GetByID

Response:result/ PartDataSet/ Part/Number02) . Map the result of that

expression to your target field.

I think that will do what you want.

Your mileage may vary.

--

Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /

Picometrix

bspolarich@advanced photonix. com ~ 734-864-5618 ~

www.advancedphotoni x.com

From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On
Behalf

Of Daniel Laidig

Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:10 PM

To: vantage@yahoogroups .com

Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition

I wrote a SC workflow that I need to have number01 be mapped to another

field if checkbox01=true otherwise I need number02 to be mapped to that

field. I am not really sure if a condition functoid in service connect

can

do what I want or not. I was hoping to be able to do this in my mapping

process and not using the condition statement in the main workflow

designer.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how I would tackle this? Thanks,

Daniel

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · February 27, 2009, 2:10pm

I wrote a SC workflow that I need to have number01 be mapped to another
field if checkbox01=true otherwise I need number02 to be mapped to that
field. I am not really sure if a condition functoid in service connect can
do what I want or not. I was hoping to be able to do this in my mapping
process and not using the condition statement in the main workflow designer.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I would tackle this? Thanks,

Daniel

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · February 27, 2009, 2:28pm

Well, if you don't want to do it in the XML mapper of the conversion,
them have a choice activity feed 2 different conversions depending on
outcome of testing the checkbox value

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Laidig" <daniellaidig@...>
wrote:

>
> I wrote a SC workflow that I need to have number01 be mapped to

another

> field if checkbox01=true otherwise I need number02 to be mapped to

that

> field. I am not really sure if a condition functoid in service

connect can

> do what I want or not. I was hoping to be able to do this in my

mapping

> process and not using the condition statement in the main workflow

designer.

> Does anyone have any suggestions on how I would tackle this?

Thanks,

>
>
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

system · February 27, 2009, 4:32pm

How about this approach? Use a conditional functoid as you suggest,
setting its default condition to Number01 (e.g.
/msg/req/dta/GetByIDResponse/result/PartDataSet/PartSubs/Number01) -
just link it on the left to the default value if the checkbox isn't
checked.

Add an alternative whose condition expression is Checkbox01 (e.g.
/msg:msg/msg:req/msg:dta/ext_GetByIDResponse:GetByIDResponse/ext_GetByID
Response:result/PartDataSet/Part/Checkbox01) and whose value expression
is Number02 (e.g.
/msg:msg/msg:req/msg:dta/ext_GetByIDResponse:GetByIDResponse/ext_GetByID
Response:result/PartDataSet/Part/Number02). Map the result of that
expression to your target field.

I think that will do what you want.

Your mileage may vary.

--

Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /
Picometrix

bspolarich@... ~ 734-864-5618 ~
www.advancedphotonix.com

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Daniel Laidig
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:10 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition

I wrote a SC workflow that I need to have number01 be mapped to another
field if checkbox01=true otherwise I need number02 to be mapped to that
field. I am not really sure if a condition functoid in service connect
can
do what I want or not. I was hoping to be able to do this in my mapping
process and not using the condition statement in the main workflow
designer.
Does anyone have any suggestions on how I would tackle this? Thanks,

Daniel

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

system · February 28, 2009, 9:51am

thanks, that did the trick.

--- On Fri, 2/27/09, Brian W. Spolarich <bspolarich@...> wrote:
From: Brian W. Spolarich <bspolarich@...>
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, February 27, 2009, 4:32 PM

How about this approach? Use a conditional functoid as you suggest,

setting its default condition to Number01 (e.g.

/msg/req/dta/ GetByIDResponse/ result/PartDataS et/PartSubs/ Number01) -

just link it on the left to the default value if the checkbox isn't

checked.

Add an alternative whose condition expression is Checkbox01 (e.g.

/msg:msg/msg: req/msg:dta/ ext_GetByIDRespo nse:GetByIDRespo nse/ext_GetByID

Response:result/ PartDataSet/ Part/Checkbox01) and whose value expression

is Number02 (e.g.

/msg:msg/msg: req/msg:dta/ ext_GetByIDRespo nse:GetByIDRespo nse/ext_GetByID

Response:result/ PartDataSet/ Part/Number02) . Map the result of that

expression to your target field.

I think that will do what you want.

Your mileage may vary.

--

Brian W. Spolarich ~ Manager, Information Services ~ Advanced Photonix /

Picometrix

bspolarich@advanced photonix. com ~ 734-864-5618 ~

www.advancedphotoni x.com

From: vantage@yahoogroups .com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups .com] On Behalf

Of Daniel Laidig

Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:10 PM

To: vantage@yahoogroups .com

Subject: [Vantage] Service Connect Condition

I wrote a SC workflow that I need to have number01 be mapped to another

field if checkbox01=true otherwise I need number02 to be mapped to that

field. I am not really sure if a condition functoid in service connect

can

do what I want or not. I was hoping to be able to do this in my mapping

process and not using the condition statement in the main workflow

designer.

Does anyone have any suggestions on how I would tackle this? Thanks,

Daniel

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]