Spam V8 Performance with 150 Users

I'm sure Progress is faster but we're deep into SQL Server and Oracle
and have already written a lot of SQL code against the Vantage
database. From a management standpoint, the problem with Progress is
that my developers don't see it as a skill in high demand.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Barry" <mbarry@...> wrote:
>
> Considering your anticipated user load, prior to going live you may
want to
> do yourself the favor of a comparative evaluation of using Progress
as the
> backend.
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael
>
> _____
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of
> Brad Feazell
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:56 AM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Spam [Vantage] V8 Performance with 150 Users
>
>
>
> We plan to go live in October and I'm wondering if anyone has
> experienced any drastic performance reduction under user load.
>
> Since we started our implementation, performance has improved as
new
> service packs were released. With only a handful of users on the
> system, performance is fine. But if the performance gets a lot
worse
> when 150 users logon, we're in trouble.
>
> We have a 190 user license. Running SQL. Client PCs are 2.0Ghz and
up
> with 1-2Gb RAM. Server is a dual-core 2-way with 8Gb RAM. Planning
to
> upgrade the server to a dual-core 4-way when the new generation
dual
> core processors are available in a couple of months.
>
> Anyone have go-live performance experience to share? Surprises or
> success stories?
>
> Thanks,
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
We plan to go live in October and I'm wondering if anyone has
experienced any drastic performance reduction under user load.

Since we started our implementation, performance has improved as new
service packs were released. With only a handful of users on the
system, performance is fine. But if the performance gets a lot worse
when 150 users logon, we're in trouble.

We have a 190 user license. Running SQL. Client PCs are 2.0Ghz and up
with 1-2Gb RAM. Server is a dual-core 2-way with 8Gb RAM. Planning to
upgrade the server to a dual-core 4-way when the new generation dual
core processors are available in a couple of months.

Anyone have go-live performance experience to share? Surprises or
success stories?

Thanks,
Brad
You running gigabit ethernet?

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Brad Feazell
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] V8 Performance with 150 Users



We plan to go live in October and I'm wondering if anyone has
experienced any drastic performance reduction under user load.

Since we started our implementation, performance has improved as new
service packs were released. With only a handful of users on the
system, performance is fine. But if the performance gets a lot worse
when 150 users logon, we're in trouble.

We have a 190 user license. Running SQL. Client PCs are 2.0Ghz and up
with 1-2Gb RAM. Server is a dual-core 2-way with 8Gb RAM. Planning to
upgrade the server to a dual-core 4-way when the new generation dual
core processors are available in a couple of months.

Anyone have go-live performance experience to share? Surprises or
success stories?

Thanks,
Brad






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Considering your anticipated user load, prior to going live you may want to
do yourself the favor of a comparative evaluation of using Progress as the
backend.

Regards,

Michael

_____

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Brad Feazell
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 11:56 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Spam [Vantage] V8 Performance with 150 Users



We plan to go live in October and I'm wondering if anyone has
experienced any drastic performance reduction under user load.

Since we started our implementation, performance has improved as new
service packs were released. With only a handful of users on the
system, performance is fine. But if the performance gets a lot worse
when 150 users logon, we're in trouble.

We have a 190 user license. Running SQL. Client PCs are 2.0Ghz and up
with 1-2Gb RAM. Server is a dual-core 2-way with 8Gb RAM. Planning to
upgrade the server to a dual-core 4-way when the new generation dual
core processors are available in a couple of months.

Anyone have go-live performance experience to share? Surprises or
success stories?

Thanks,
Brad






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]