SSD's RE: Final hardware config for E9 implementa

Hello Jared,

I wasn't really trying to demonstrate the ultimate throughput potential of an SSD array so much as to belay the cost argument. Sure you can exceed 900 MB/sec with a larger array of drives, in fact, it is always possible to drive the limit of the bus assuming a sufficient number of parallel storage devices. What I was hoping would be the take away was that for a mere $2500 you could configure a storage solution that would blow the doors off of solutions that people customarily pay over ten times more for.

Michael

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/

This email, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify me by telephone and permanently delete the original and any copy of any email and any printout thereof.




On Dec 29, 2009, at 6:18 PM, Jared Allmond wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> Not to start a round of one-upsmanship, but while 900 MB/sec is impressive, how about 3.4 GB/s! http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-6gb-raid,2388.html?xtmc=2_2_gb_s&xtcr=2
>
> That Photofast link is very similar to my setup. I have 8 Intel x25-e SSDs in a RAID 10 array. I will have to do more research on those Photofast drives. They mention writes at up to 270 MB/s which is faster than anything I have read about save a FusionIO. And they appear to be MLC based, interesting. I'm guessing the 128 MB of onboard cache may have something to do with the write speed.
>
> Len,
> Very amusing video. I don't think I'm brave enough to open everything on my start menu like the video did using my own PC. It would probably ruin it for half a day. I'd be happy to make a Youtube video of my own... now if only FusionIO would send me some samples...
>
> Jared
> _______________________
> Jared Allmond
> IT Systems Administrator
> Wright Coating Technologies
> jallmond@...<mailto:jallmond@...>
> voice: 269.344.8195
> direct: 269.341.4353
> fax: 269.344.3007
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hi Michael,
Not to start a round of one-upsmanship, but while 900 MB/sec is impressive, how about 3.4 GB/s! http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-6gb-raid,2388.html?xtmc=2_2_gb_s&xtcr=2

That Photofast link is very similar to my setup. I have 8 Intel x25-e SSDs in a RAID 10 array. I will have to do more research on those Photofast drives. They mention writes at up to 270 MB/s which is faster than anything I have read about save a FusionIO. And they appear to be MLC based, interesting. I'm guessing the 128 MB of onboard cache may have something to do with the write speed.

Len,
Very amusing video. I don't think I'm brave enough to open everything on my start menu like the video did using my own PC. It would probably ruin it for half a day. I'd be happy to make a Youtube video of my own... now if only FusionIO would send me some samples...

Jared
_______________________
Jared Allmond
IT Systems Administrator
Wright Coating Technologies
jallmond@...<mailto:jallmond@...>
voice: 269.344.8195
direct: 269.341.4353
fax: 269.344.3007



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I thought some of you might find this interesting. We've been running our Vantage 6 database (Progress, ~15GB) for the past few years on a Texas Memory Systems RAMSAN 325. It's basically a unit made up of 32GB of RAM with the data duplicated to hard drives in the event of power loss. The unit is presented to the server as persistent storage (like just another hard drive) via fiber channel.

The manufacturer states 400,000 IOPS sustained and bandwidth up to 3GB/s. With the advent of affordable SSDs, we tested our production database (the whole system as a virtual machine, in fact) running on two Intel X25 Gen 2 SSD's in RAID1, and never noticed a performance loss. Obviously our system is isn't pushing the RAMSAN to anywhere near it's limits, but it is nice to know that we have an secondary storage solution immediately available to fill in for the RAMSAN should it fail.

Andy

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Jared Allmond <jallmond@...> wrote:
>
> Hi Michael,
> Not to start a round of one-upsmanship, but while 900 MB/sec is impressive, how about 3.4 GB/s! http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-6gb-raid,2388.html?xtmc=2_2_gb_s&xtcr=2
>
> That Photofast link is very similar to my setup. I have 8 Intel x25-e SSDs in a RAID 10 array. I will have to do more research on those Photofast drives. They mention writes at up to 270 MB/s which is faster than anything I have read about save a FusionIO. And they appear to be MLC based, interesting. I'm guessing the 128 MB of onboard cache may have something to do with the write speed.
>
> Len,
> Very amusing video. I don't think I'm brave enough to open everything on my start menu like the video did using my own PC. It would probably ruin it for half a day. I'd be happy to make a Youtube video of my own... now if only FusionIO would send me some samples...
>
> Jared
> _______________________
> Jared Allmond
> IT Systems Administrator
> Wright Coating Technologies
> jallmond@...<mailto:jallmond@...>
> voice: 269.344.8195
> direct: 269.341.4353
> fax: 269.344.3007
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>