Hi Mike
The historical value on the stock status report (V8), from what I have
found has a bug.
If you make an adjustment to cost with a backdated transaction date
(tested with average), the average can go even lower than any average in
its transaction history.
I have looked into it and I think it's due to the average calculation in
the system working off the system date, but the report must work off the
transaction date.
I think that explains it
Gary Parfrey
Steatite Limited
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mike Lowe
Sent: 26 June 2006 18:52
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Stock History
One thing to be aware of on the Stock Status report is that when you run
this report in the past to get a historical on-hand quantity and value,
the cost is the cost for the part at the time that the report is run,
not what it was on the historical date.
Hope this helps,
Mike Lowe
Connor Manufacturing Services
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of brychanwilliams
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:41 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Stock History
Hi Gary,
I can get the qtys right ok, but in terms of value I can't get it to
work on some parts. One part in particular is lot costed , always
has been, but there are some very strange ADJ-CST transactions which
I can't tie up. The stock status report is correct but mine is
failing.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Gary Parfrey" <garyp@...> wrote:
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail
without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to
minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise
you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by
software viruses.
This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
The historical value on the stock status report (V8), from what I have
found has a bug.
If you make an adjustment to cost with a backdated transaction date
(tested with average), the average can go even lower than any average in
its transaction history.
I have looked into it and I think it's due to the average calculation in
the system working off the system date, but the report must work off the
transaction date.
I think that explains it
Gary Parfrey
Steatite Limited
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Mike Lowe
Sent: 26 June 2006 18:52
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Stock History
One thing to be aware of on the Stock Status report is that when you run
this report in the past to get a historical on-hand quantity and value,
the cost is the cost for the part at the time that the report is run,
not what it was on the historical date.
Hope this helps,
Mike Lowe
Connor Manufacturing Services
________________________________
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
Of brychanwilliams
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 10:41 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Stock History
Hi Gary,
I can get the qtys right ok, but in terms of value I can't get it to
work on some parts. One part in particular is lot costed , always
has been, but there are some very strange ADJ-CST transactions which
I can't tie up. The stock status report is correct but mine is
failing.
--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ,
"Gary Parfrey" <garyp@...> wrote:
>and
> Hi Brychan
>
>
>
> I would start with the current stock position (ie Part, Part Class
> PartWhse table) then subtract or add inventory transaction(parttran)
> from it/to it based on the transaction date.<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
>
>
>
> One of the issues might be the last cost that is in the part master
> (6.1) partcost table (8.0) may have been a different cost in the
> previous month.
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf
> Of brychanwilliams<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: 26 June 2006 17:19
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
> Subject: [Vantage] Stock Historytotal
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a report that provides the current stock
> and previous month totals split by part class. My starting pointhas
> been the Parttran table. Is it possible to do this via thatParttran?
> My initial attempts don't seem very encouraging. I can get theto
> quantities to match up against the stock status but I can't seem
> obtain the correct valuation. We are using a mixture of Lot andLast
> costed parts.you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
>
>
> This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If
immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail
without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to
minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise
you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this
message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by
software viruses.
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, disclose or distribute this e-mail without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]