We jumped to Vantage from a custom Paradox -DOS program approx. 18 months
ago. At that time after weighing all the options we ended up moving to a
Windows version of Paradox and simply created reports with any of the past
information we needed to get at, then started completely fresh and
unattached with the Vantage system. At first we thought the transistion was
going to be a nightmare, but in the end it worked out fine... the process
and sales engineers were able reference Paradox and then re-key the same
info. to a new job in the Vantage system rather easily.
Hope this helps.
Rick Schatz
Quala-Die, Inc.
ago. At that time after weighing all the options we ended up moving to a
Windows version of Paradox and simply created reports with any of the past
information we needed to get at, then started completely fresh and
unattached with the Vantage system. At first we thought the transistion was
going to be a nightmare, but in the end it worked out fine... the process
and sales engineers were able reference Paradox and then re-key the same
info. to a new job in the Vantage system rather easily.
Hope this helps.
Rick Schatz
Quala-Die, Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeanne Weiler" <JWEILER@...>
To: <vantage@egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2000 5:37 PM
Subject: [Vantage] TECHNICAL
> We currently have a custom database written in Paradox 5.0. It is very
old
> and falling apart. We would like to know what is the best way to create
an
> application that would work with Vantage.
>
> Should we write this program in MS-Access/Visual Basic so that we can find
> the developers or does anyone else have a suggestion as to what we should
> write this program in.
>
>
> We no longer allow attachments to files. To access/share Report Files,
please go to the following link: http://www.egroups.com/files/vantage/
> (Note: If this link does not work for you the first time you try it, go
to www.egroups.com, login and be sure to save your password, choose My
Groups, choose Vantage, then choose Files. If you save the password, the
link above will work the next time you try it.)
>