Upgrade to 9.05

Technically only the sending party can violate the EULA. The receiving party has no agreement with the vendor so there is nothing to violate. The vendor could, however, make a copyright claim but only if the content is put to use.

Totally agree that you can borrow a copy to restore your legally licensed original. What you cannot do is borrow and restore a copy where no such license exists.

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/

On Aug 18, 2011, at 10:31 AM, to.crds wrote:

> When you "purchase" software, the media it is on belongs to you, while content remains property of the SW company. You only get a license (as described in the EULA) to use the content.
>
> If I give or even sell someone a CD for AutoCAD (and it's not installed or in use on any of my systems), and they decide to use it as a coaster or make a craft project out of it, then there has been no violation of the EULA. Only the receiving party can violate the EULA.
>
> But back to the main point...
>
> Why can't you get a copy from the S/W company? If they've gone out of business or no longer support that product, than I see no harm "borrowing" a copy to restore your legally licensed original.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, Michael Barry <mbarry@...> wrote:
> >
> > I can't speak for your reading of EULAS. I personally have never seen one that says our physical software is worthless so distribute it at will. However other EULAS read, the following is from Epicor's:
> >
> > END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT
> >
> > 1. DEFINITIONS
> >
> > In this Agreement, the words "you," "your," and "Customer" mean the person or entity named on the signature page of this Agreement as the Customer, and includes any authorized subcontractor, agent or consultant acting on its behalf. The words "we," "us," "our," and "Epicor" each mean Epicor Software Corporation. The term "Software" means all software products (including Product Updates) obtained from Epicor as denoted on an Order or otherwise and the related Documentation. The term "Documentation" means product user guides, installation guides, manuals and release notes. "Order" means Epicor's standard form for ordering software product licenses. "Product Update" means any update, patch, new release and/or new version of a licensed Software product.
> >
> > 2. GRANT; USE
> >
> > (a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, we grant you a perpetual, non-exclusive license to use the Software in object code form solely for you and your subsidiaries' and affiliates' internal business purposes. Upon complete payment of the applicable Software license fees, the license shall be considered royalty-free. You are responsible for the acts and omission of your subsidiaries, affiliates, subcontractors, agents and consultants with respect to their use of the Software and this Agreement, and all such acts or omissions shall be deemed acts or omissions on your part.
> >
> > 3. OWNERSHIP; REVERSE ENGINEERING; RESTRICTIONS
> >
> > (a) This Software is licensed, not sold, to you. Epicor and its licensors retain all title and ownership to the Software. Epicor and its licensors reserve all rights in the patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other intellectual property in the Software. You may make a reasonable number of copies of the Software for archival purposes. You may not use the Software to provide time sharing services or operate a services bureau for third parties.
> >
> > (f) You agree not to reverse engineer, modify, decrypt, extract, disassemble, copy, or decompile the Software, or permit anyone else to, except as required by applicable local law or to reproduce machine-readable object code portions for backup purposes.
> >
> >
> > Section 3 (f) makes it very clear that the licensee agrees not to copy the software and section 1 stipulates that Software means ALL of the software.
> >
> > Michael Barry
> > Aspacia Systems Inc
> > 866.566.9600
> > 312.803.0730 fax
> > http://www.aspacia.com/
> >
> >
> > On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ned wrote:
> >
> > > According to every EULA I have ever read, and there are a lot of them, I am
> > > not asking anyone to violate any EULA they have.
> > >
> > > The physical software installation files themselves are worthless without
> > > the proper serial numbers and codes to use it, I am not asking anyone for
> > > that information. I have that information, I only need the physical files
> > > required for the installation.
> > >
> > > This is the same as distributing any software disc(example: a cd copy of MS
> > > Windows), which is perfectly legal as long as the codes/license/serial
> > > numbers to go along with it in order to activate and use the software are
> > > not also provided with the installation files, nor have the files been
> > > altered in any way to get around the use of those codes/serial
> > > numbers/licenses.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Michael Barry
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM
> > > To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05
> > >
> > > One might give pause to consider both the wisdom and the ethics of utilizing
> > > a public forum to solicit someone to violate their company's software
> > > license agreement.
> > >
> > > Michael Barry
> > > Aspacia Systems Inc
> > > 866.566.9600
> > > 312.803.0730 fax
> > > http://www.aspacia.com/
> > >
> > > On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Ned wrote:
> > >
> > > > On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone
> > > > has them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload
> > > > them for me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me
> > > > off list if you would be able to do this for me.
> > > >
> > > > Ned
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> > > already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> > > (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> > > Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> > > (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> > > (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Since we upgraded to Epicor 9.05.605, we've been experiencing a very high rate of issues where users report they are getting an "Out of Memory" error when trying to run certain reports. These are large reports, but they mostly ran fine on 9.04. Our "sporadic" out of memory issues on 9.04 has become daily issues on 9.05. I know that there is a new run time with 9.05, I'm not sure if this is the issue.

Tech Support threw it back at us as a windows issue. Is anyone else experiencing this? Have you found the cause and/or a workaround (besides redesigning all of our reports)?

Also, one other note: I can run a report one day, get the "out of memory" issue, then turn around and run the report the next day with the same data and it will run fine.

Thanks in advance,

Kevin Simon
We got the one-off patch (replaces the report monitor) to fix this on the reports we were getting errors on. We are on 9.05.605 as well. The 606 is supposed to have this fix in it already.

The other thing I've found is if you're converting old reports you really need to upgrade them to Crystal 2008. You can leave them in Crystal XI R2 and they will work for the most part, but upgrading them is safer.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "ksimon8fw" <simstrak@...> wrote:
>
> Since we upgraded to Epicor 9.05.605, we've been experiencing a very high rate of issues where users report they are getting an "Out of Memory" error when trying to run certain reports. These are large reports, but they mostly ran fine on 9.04. Our "sporadic" out of memory issues on 9.04 has become daily issues on 9.05. I know that there is a new run time with 9.05, I'm not sure if this is the issue.
>
> Tech Support threw it back at us as a windows issue. Is anyone else experiencing this? Have you found the cause and/or a workaround (besides redesigning all of our reports)?
>
> Also, one other note: I can run a report one day, get the "out of memory" issue, then turn around and run the report the next day with the same data and it will run fine.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Kevin Simon
>
Could you share a Tech name, call#, SCR number, one-off number, anything to identify that call or patch? I just called tech support and they seemed unaware of any fix.

Denton


--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "Jennifer" <Jennifer.Lisser@...> wrote:
>
> We got the one-off patch (replaces the report monitor) to fix this on the reports we were getting errors on. We are on 9.05.605 as well. The 606 is supposed to have this fix in it already.
>
> The other thing I've found is if you're converting old reports you really need to upgrade them to Crystal 2008. You can leave them in Crystal XI R2 and they will work for the most part, but upgrading them is safer.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "ksimon8fw" <simstrak@> wrote:
> >
> > Since we upgraded to Epicor 9.05.605, we've been experiencing a very high rate of issues where users report they are getting an "Out of Memory" error when trying to run certain reports. These are large reports, but they mostly ran fine on 9.04. Our "sporadic" out of memory issues on 9.04 has become daily issues on 9.05. I know that there is a new run time with 9.05, I'm not sure if this is the issue.
> >
> > Tech Support threw it back at us as a windows issue. Is anyone else experiencing this? Have you found the cause and/or a workaround (besides redesigning all of our reports)?
> >
> > Also, one other note: I can run a report one day, get the "out of memory" issue, then turn around and run the report the next day with the same data and it will run fine.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Kevin Simon
> >
>
The file patched is Epicor.Mfg.BO.ReportMonitor relating to
SCR 84836

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "dyoderbx" <dyoder@...> wrote:
Could you share a Tech name, call#, SCR number, one-off number, anything to identify that call or patch? I just called tech support and they seemed unaware of any fix.

Denton
We had these issues when we went to E9 from Vantage. What we found was that yes, and support agreed, that E9 does not handle graphics the same way as in Vantage and you get these errors when your report has large graphics.
We had large header graphic images in color, on most of our standard forms that caused it to kack.

We created simpler graphic files in Black and White, and then placed a small .5" x .5" graphic image in the header and then modified the Image Location field to point to our full size graphic image. This allows the report to pull the image in at runtime instead of it being embedded in the report.
Problem solved.

Try it and see if that helps.

Regards,
George Hicks
PCI

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "ksimon8fw" <simstrak@...> wrote:
>
> Since we upgraded to Epicor 9.05.605, we've been experiencing a very high rate of issues where users report they are getting an "Out of Memory" error when trying to run certain reports. These are large reports, but they mostly ran fine on 9.04. Our "sporadic" out of memory issues on 9.04 has become daily issues on 9.05. I know that there is a new run time with 9.05, I'm not sure if this is the issue.
>
> Tech Support threw it back at us as a windows issue. Is anyone else experiencing this? Have you found the cause and/or a workaround (besides redesigning all of our reports)?
>
> Also, one other note: I can run a report one day, get the "out of memory" issue, then turn around and run the report the next day with the same data and it will run fine.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Kevin Simon
>
This is my first message to one list. Has anyone dealt recently with an
upgrade from the old 6.1 to the current Vantage 9.xx version? Would you
recommend sending the database into Epicor?



Thank you. Rick.



Richard D. Schatz



Office Manager

Quala-Die, Inc.

1250 Brusselles Street

St.Marys, PA 15857-1902

Phone: 814/781-6280

Fax: 814/781-3673

Cell: 814/512-5126



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We just upgraded from 6.1 to 9.05.



We got the assistance of a VAR and Epicor for the actual database
conversion (thinking of it as a one time event) and put our effort into
understanding the application changes & training (keeping long term
knowledge in house). YMMV depending on your people etc.



If you search the list archives you'll find plenty of posts about the
database conversion choices. Your major decisions are: (1) Progress vs
SQL database, (2) convert database vs re-implementation. Lots of pros &
cons depending on your company & needs. Search for "DMT" as well (a
possible conversion tool).



There are some major application changes you'll have... "fun"... with:

- unit of measure - Vantage 6 is anything goes, Epicor 9
heavily uses this

- resource groups - major changes in operations, work centers,
etc

- financial... oh my god, complete re-write here, test
everything. Twice.



If you have any custom code/reports/etc, assume you'll need to do a
complete re-write to start. We struggled with converting a couple of
our customizations, and discovered a couple weren't needed any more :-)



Welcome to the list, and post questions any time. Or contact me
off-list (broberts@...) if you have specific questions about my
conversion from 6.



Brian.



________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Richard D. Schatz
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:25 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05





This is my first message to one list. Has anyone dealt recently with an
upgrade from the old 6.1 to the current Vantage 9.xx version? Would you
recommend sending the database into Epicor?

Thank you. Rick.

Richard D. Schatz

Office Manager

Quala-Die, Inc.

1250 Brusselles Street

St.Marys, PA 15857-1902

Phone: 814/781-6280

Fax: 814/781-3673

Cell: 814/512-5126




.


<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=20369/grpspId=1705007181/msg
Id=103294/stime=1313497102>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We just went live on July 11, 2011 with an upgrade from Vantage 6.1 to
Epicor 9.05.605 and it has been very painful. Our data was not mapped
correctly during the conversion and it has taken 5 weeks to get back to
almost normal. Most of our known issues will be taken care of once the
606 service pack has been installed, but there are other open issues
that we are still chasing for a resolution. We sent our database in to
Epicor for the final conversion. To begin our upgrade project, we sent
our database in for the test conversion from Vantage 6.1 to Epicor
9.05.600 in April 2010 and ran through many pilots to learn how to use
Epicor 9.05 and applied every service pack and patch that was released,
but when Epicor converted our data this July 2011, they did not map it
the same way. Why? Who can guess, but this has not been a very smooth
or well-supported process. The conversion team dropped us as soon as
the conversion was complete putting all the troubleshooting in the hands
of support and the development team to identify and help us to fix these
issues. I don't have any recommendations for you as I thought we were
in good shape after piloting the software for a year. Good luck.

Karen Morgan
IT Manager
J.M. Murray Center, Inc.



IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this e-mail and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Thanks for the update. We are looking to move forward with a live
conversion in October most likely. Our database was last converted in
February.



Maybe, I should pay for a conversion soon to make sure they use the same
mappings and programs.



Thanks,

Joe Sanders

Wipaire, Inc.



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Karen Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:39 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05





We just went live on July 11, 2011 with an upgrade from Vantage 6.1 to
Epicor 9.05.605 and it has been very painful. Our data was not mapped
correctly during the conversion and it has taken 5 weeks to get back to
almost normal. Most of our known issues will be taken care of once the
606 service pack has been installed, but there are other open issues
that we are still chasing for a resolution. We sent our database in to
Epicor for the final conversion. To begin our upgrade project, we sent
our database in for the test conversion from Vantage 6.1 to Epicor
9.05.600 in April 2010 and ran through many pilots to learn how to use
Epicor 9.05 and applied every service pack and patch that was released,
but when Epicor converted our data this July 2011, they did not map it
the same way. Why? Who can guess, but this has not been a very smooth
or well-supported process. The conversion team dropped us as soon as
the conversion was complete putting all the troubleshooting in the hands
of support and the development team to identify and help us to fix these
issues. I don't have any recommendations for you as I thought we were
in good shape after piloting the software for a year. Good luck.

Karen Morgan
IT Manager
J.M. Murray Center, Inc.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message and any attachments are solely for the
intended recipient and may contain confidential information which is, or may
be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
use, or distribution of the information included in this e-mail and any
attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We are on 9.04.507, I hope our upgrade will not be as painful. We are
planning to upgrade to 9.05.60X in 6-8 months.



Mike Tonoyan / Natel Engr.

mtonoyan@...



From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Joe Sanders
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 2:49 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05





Thanks for the update. We are looking to move forward with a live
conversion in October most likely. Our database was last converted in
February.

Maybe, I should pay for a conversion soon to make sure they use the same
mappings and programs.

Thanks,

Joe Sanders

Wipaire, Inc.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ] On
Behalf Of
Karen Morgan
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 4:39 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05

We just went live on July 11, 2011 with an upgrade from Vantage 6.1 to
Epicor 9.05.605 and it has been very painful. Our data was not mapped
correctly during the conversion and it has taken 5 weeks to get back to
almost normal. Most of our known issues will be taken care of once the
606 service pack has been installed, but there are other open issues
that we are still chasing for a resolution. We sent our database in to
Epicor for the final conversion. To begin our upgrade project, we sent
our database in for the test conversion from Vantage 6.1 to Epicor
9.05.600 in April 2010 and ran through many pilots to learn how to use
Epicor 9.05 and applied every service pack and patch that was released,
but when Epicor converted our data this July 2011, they did not map it
the same way. Why? Who can guess, but this has not been a very smooth
or well-supported process. The conversion team dropped us as soon as
the conversion was complete putting all the troubleshooting in the hands
of support and the development team to identify and help us to fix these
issues. I don't have any recommendations for you as I thought we were
in good shape after piloting the software for a year. Good luck.

Karen Morgan
IT Manager
J.M. Murray Center, Inc.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message and any attachments are solely for the
intended recipient and may contain confidential information which is, or
may
be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further
disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,
copying,
use, or distribution of the information included in this e-mail and any
attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in
error,
please notify the sender by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently
delete this e-mail and any attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying or disclosure to/by any other person(s) is strictly prohibited. By accepting this information, recipients confirm that they understand and will comply with all applicable ITAR and EAR requirements.
______________________________________________________________________

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I upgraded from 6.1 to 8x in 2009. The conversion took about 20 hours to
complete until we did a dump and load on the 6.x, then it converted in about
2 hours.

I had done this conversion several times over the course of three months
while testing and training. I thought it was worth converting it myself so
we could frequently have recent data to work with, plus it allowed us to
mock running concurrently for a time.

I have not gone from 8 to 9.

--
Randy Weber
weber.randy@...
(651) 263-1811

http://randallweber.com/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We went from 6.1 to 9.04 and yes, it was very painful. And yes, since it took weeks for Epicor to convert to the pilot and only three days to convert to production, there were issues with production that were not issues with the pilot. And yes, the conversion people drop you like a hot potato the day you go live and you are at the mercy of Support to call them about land mines that they already know about. It may be easier to convert to 8, stay there a while and then convert to 9.

Ed Kowalski
Treasurer
Morton Manufacturing Co.
700 Liberty Drive
Libertyville, IL 60048
847-362-5400 x104
847-362-5434 fax



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I don't think Epicor is doing anything special with the conversions that
they run for you, the only thing I am aware they do is run the DB through an
installation of 8.03, 9.04 and then 9.05 that they have installed on servers
at their offices.

If you can build a server at your location with a bunch of drives in RAID,
even RAID 0 is fine since it is temporary and redundancy is not critical
like in a production environment, and then put an installation of 8.03, 9.04
and 9.05 on that server(yes all of them on the same server is fine and
faster for this sort of thing), then you can run the conversions yourself as
many times as you want to in order to make sure as many bugs are worked out
as much as possible prior to your actual go live weekend.

While there are a whole bunch of factors that play into things, conversions
should not be taking 3 days to complete unless they are running on some
really bad hardware or the conversions sit for hours in between versions,
if the process is paid attention to during the whole time, 24 hours should
be about right for a large DB, maybe 36 in some rare cases.

I have recently run through conversions for customers from 8.03 to 9.05, and
was able to get them back up and running in 36 hours, and 14 of those hours
was spent converting them from a Progress DB to a SQL DB.

However, since you are a 6.10 customer, I would recommend that you seriously
consider a re-implementation(migration) of Epicor instead of a conversion
and make use of the DMT Tool to allow you to clean, organize, and update all
of your data since there are some monumental changes between 6.10 and 9.05
and it can be a real pain at times to figure out a way to make sure things
end up the way you want them. Things like Ship-To, Contacts, GL, and UOM
are all things that frustrate people, and by doing a migration instead of a
conversion, you can eliminate many headaches and most likely end up with a
nicer DB in the end.

Sometimes the migration takes longer than a conversion, however, sometimes
it also takes less time as well depending on what you decide to bring
forward.

On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone has
them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload them for
me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me off list if you
would be able to do this for me.

Ned
Skip the SAS, purchase 2 SSD's for raid 0 if you go with Ned's suggestion. The time savings will be huge and outweigh the cost of lost time.

"Zac" Jason Woodward
Network Administrator
Intermountain Electronics, Inc.
O: 877-544-2291
M: 435-820-6515
F: 435-637-9601
www.ie-corp.com

Creating customer confidence through extraordinary service and experienced industry experts.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ned
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:10 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05



I don't think Epicor is doing anything special with the conversions that
they run for you, the only thing I am aware they do is run the DB through an
installation of 8.03, 9.04 and then 9.05 that they have installed on servers
at their offices.

If you can build a server at your location with a bunch of drives in RAID,
even RAID 0 is fine since it is temporary and redundancy is not critical
like in a production environment, and then put an installation of 8.03, 9.04
and 9.05 on that server(yes all of them on the same server is fine and
faster for this sort of thing), then you can run the conversions yourself as
many times as you want to in order to make sure as many bugs are worked out
as much as possible prior to your actual go live weekend.

While there are a whole bunch of factors that play into things, conversions
should not be taking 3 days to complete unless they are running on some
really bad hardware or the conversions sit for hours in between versions,
if the process is paid attention to during the whole time, 24 hours should
be about right for a large DB, maybe 36 in some rare cases.

I have recently run through conversions for customers from 8.03 to 9.05, and
was able to get them back up and running in 36 hours, and 14 of those hours
was spent converting them from a Progress DB to a SQL DB.

However, since you are a 6.10 customer, I would recommend that you seriously
consider a re-implementation(migration) of Epicor instead of a conversion
and make use of the DMT Tool to allow you to clean, organize, and update all
of your data since there are some monumental changes between 6.10 and 9.05
and it can be a real pain at times to figure out a way to make sure things
end up the way you want them. Things like Ship-To, Contacts, GL, and UOM
are all things that frustrate people, and by doing a migration instead of a
conversion, you can eliminate many headaches and most likely end up with a
nicer DB in the end.

Sometimes the migration takes longer than a conversion, however, sometimes
it also takes less time as well depending on what you decide to bring
forward.

On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone has
them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload them for
me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me off list if you
would be able to do this for me.

Ned



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
We converted from 5.1 to 9.05 over New Year's weekend last year on our own. The actual data conversion time was under 48 hrs. 6.1 to 8 and 8 to 9 were the most time consuming. We used virtual servers for nearly all the conversion. Worked great..... comments about UOM and Resource Groups are well founded, BEWARE.

Keith Mailloux

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Zac Jason Woodward
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 11:21 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05



Skip the SAS, purchase 2 SSD's for raid 0 if you go with Ned's suggestion. The time savings will be huge and outweigh the cost of lost time.

"Zac" Jason Woodward
Network Administrator
Intermountain Electronics, Inc.
O: 877-544-2291
M: 435-820-6515
F: 435-637-9601
www.ie-corp.com<http://www.ie-corp.com>

Creating customer confidence through extraordinary service and experienced industry experts.

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>] On Behalf Of Ned
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 9:10 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com<mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05

I don't think Epicor is doing anything special with the conversions that
they run for you, the only thing I am aware they do is run the DB through an
installation of 8.03, 9.04 and then 9.05 that they have installed on servers
at their offices.

If you can build a server at your location with a bunch of drives in RAID,
even RAID 0 is fine since it is temporary and redundancy is not critical
like in a production environment, and then put an installation of 8.03, 9.04
and 9.05 on that server(yes all of them on the same server is fine and
faster for this sort of thing), then you can run the conversions yourself as
many times as you want to in order to make sure as many bugs are worked out
as much as possible prior to your actual go live weekend.

While there are a whole bunch of factors that play into things, conversions
should not be taking 3 days to complete unless they are running on some
really bad hardware or the conversions sit for hours in between versions,
if the process is paid attention to during the whole time, 24 hours should
be about right for a large DB, maybe 36 in some rare cases.

I have recently run through conversions for customers from 8.03 to 9.05, and
was able to get them back up and running in 36 hours, and 14 of those hours
was spent converting them from a Progress DB to a SQL DB.

However, since you are a 6.10 customer, I would recommend that you seriously
consider a re-implementation(migration) of Epicor instead of a conversion
and make use of the DMT Tool to allow you to clean, organize, and update all
of your data since there are some monumental changes between 6.10 and 9.05
and it can be a real pain at times to figure out a way to make sure things
end up the way you want them. Things like Ship-To, Contacts, GL, and UOM
are all things that frustrate people, and by doing a migration instead of a
conversion, you can eliminate many headaches and most likely end up with a
nicer DB in the end.

Sometimes the migration takes longer than a conversion, however, sometimes
it also takes less time as well depending on what you decide to bring
forward.

On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone has
them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload them for
me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me off list if you
would be able to do this for me.

Ned

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient,
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this
e-mail and destroy any copies. Any dissemination or use of this
information by a person other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized and may be illegal.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
One might give pause to consider both the wisdom and the ethics of utilizing a public forum to solicit someone to violate their company's software license agreement.

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/

On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Ned wrote:

> On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone has
> them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload them for
> me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me off list if you
> would be able to do this for me.
>
> Ned



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
According to every EULA I have ever read, and there are a lot of them, I am
not asking anyone to violate any EULA they have.

The physical software installation files themselves are worthless without
the proper serial numbers and codes to use it, I am not asking anyone for
that information. I have that information, I only need the physical files
required for the installation.

This is the same as distributing any software disc(example: a cd copy of MS
Windows), which is perfectly legal as long as the codes/license/serial
numbers to go along with it in order to activate and use the software are
not also provided with the installation files, nor have the files been
altered in any way to get around the use of those codes/serial
numbers/licenses.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Barry
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05

One might give pause to consider both the wisdom and the ethics of utilizing
a public forum to solicit someone to violate their company's software
license agreement.

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/

On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Ned wrote:

> On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone
> has them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload
> them for me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me
> off list if you would be able to do this for me.
>
> Ned



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
I can't speak for your reading of EULAS. I personally have never seen one that says our physical software is worthless so distribute it at will. However other EULAS read, the following is from Epicor's:

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

1. DEFINITIONS

In this Agreement, the words �you,� �your,� and �Customer� mean the person or entity named on the signature page of this Agreement as the Customer, and includes any authorized subcontractor, agent or consultant acting on its behalf. The words �we,� �us,� �our,� and �Epicor� each mean Epicor Software Corporation. The term �Software� means all software products (including Product Updates) obtained from Epicor as denoted on an Order or otherwise and the related Documentation. The term �Documentation� means product user guides, installation guides, manuals and release notes. �Order� means Epicor�s standard form for ordering software product licenses. �Product Update� means any update, patch, new release and/or new version of a licensed Software product.

2. GRANT; USE

(a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, we grant you a perpetual, non-exclusive license to use the Software in object code form solely for you and your subsidiaries� and affiliates� internal business purposes. Upon complete payment of the applicable Software license fees, the license shall be considered royalty-free. You are responsible for the acts and omission of your subsidiaries, affiliates, subcontractors, agents and consultants with respect to their use of the Software and this Agreement, and all such acts or omissions shall be deemed acts or omissions on your part.

3. OWNERSHIP; REVERSE ENGINEERING; RESTRICTIONS

(a) This Software is licensed, not sold, to you. Epicor and its licensors retain all title and ownership to the Software. Epicor and its licensors reserve all rights in the patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other intellectual property in the Software. You may make a reasonable number of copies of the Software for archival purposes. You may not use the Software to provide time sharing services or operate a services bureau for third parties.

(f) You agree not to reverse engineer, modify, decrypt, extract, disassemble, copy, or decompile the Software, or permit anyone else to, except as required by applicable local law or to reproduce machine-readable object code portions for backup purposes.


Section 3 (f) makes it very clear that the licensee agrees not to copy the software and section 1 stipulates that Software means ALL of the software.

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/


On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ned wrote:

> According to every EULA I have ever read, and there are a lot of them, I am
> not asking anyone to violate any EULA they have.
>
> The physical software installation files themselves are worthless without
> the proper serial numbers and codes to use it, I am not asking anyone for
> that information. I have that information, I only need the physical files
> required for the installation.
>
> This is the same as distributing any software disc(example: a cd copy of MS
> Windows), which is perfectly legal as long as the codes/license/serial
> numbers to go along with it in order to activate and use the software are
> not also provided with the installation files, nor have the files been
> altered in any way to get around the use of those codes/serial
> numbers/licenses.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
> Michael Barry
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05
>
> One might give pause to consider both the wisdom and the ethics of utilizing
> a public forum to solicit someone to violate their company's software
> license agreement.
>
> Michael Barry
> Aspacia Systems Inc
> 866.566.9600
> 312.803.0730 fax
> http://www.aspacia.com/
>
> On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Ned wrote:
>
> > On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if anyone
> > has them and can either make them downloadable or be willing to upload
> > them for me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to contact me
> > off list if you would be able to do this for me.
> >
> > Ned
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
> already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
> Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I am not going to sit and get in an argumentative flame war back and forth
over this and create a big hubbub about it so this is my only response.

I disagree with your reading of the license and don't believe that section
is applicable to this situation given it's context in the EULA.


-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of
Michael Barry
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:02 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05

I can't speak for your reading of EULAS. I personally have never seen one
that says our physical software is worthless so distribute it at will.
However other EULAS read, the following is from Epicor's:

END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT

1. DEFINITIONS

In this Agreement, the words "you," "your," and "Customer" mean the person
or entity named on the signature page of this Agreement as the Customer, and
includes any authorized subcontractor, agent or consultant acting on its
behalf. The words "we," "us," "our," and "Epicor" each mean Epicor Software
Corporation. The term "Software" means all software products (including
Product Updates) obtained from Epicor as denoted on an Order or otherwise
and the related Documentation. The term "Documentation" means product user
guides, installation guides, manuals and release notes. "Order" means
Epicor's standard form for ordering software product licenses. "Product
Update" means any update, patch, new release and/or new version of a
licensed Software product.

2. GRANT; USE

(a) Subject to the terms of this Agreement, we grant you a perpetual,
non-exclusive license to use the Software in object code form solely for you
and your subsidiaries' and affiliates' internal business purposes. Upon
complete payment of the applicable Software license fees, the license shall
be considered royalty-free. You are responsible for the acts and omission of
your subsidiaries, affiliates, subcontractors, agents and consultants with
respect to their use of the Software and this Agreement, and all such acts
or omissions shall be deemed acts or omissions on your part.

3. OWNERSHIP; REVERSE ENGINEERING; RESTRICTIONS

(a) This Software is licensed, not sold, to you. Epicor and its licensors
retain all title and ownership to the Software. Epicor and its licensors
reserve all rights in the patents, copyrights, trade secrets and other
intellectual property in the Software. You may make a reasonable number of
copies of the Software for archival purposes. You may not use the Software
to provide time sharing services or operate a services bureau for third
parties.

(f) You agree not to reverse engineer, modify, decrypt, extract,
disassemble, copy, or decompile the Software, or permit anyone else to,
except as required by applicable local law or
to reproduce machine-readable object code portions for backup purposes.


Section 3 (f) makes it very clear that the licensee agrees not to copy the
software and section 1 stipulates that Software means ALL of the software.

Michael Barry
Aspacia Systems Inc
866.566.9600
312.803.0730 fax
http://www.aspacia.com/


On Aug 17, 2011, at 4:16 PM, Ned wrote:

> According to every EULA I have ever read, and there are a lot of them,
> I am not asking anyone to violate any EULA they have.
>
> The physical software installation files themselves are worthless
> without the proper serial numbers and codes to use it, I am not asking
> anyone for that information. I have that information, I only need the
> physical files required for the installation.
>
> This is the same as distributing any software disc(example: a cd copy
> of MS Windows), which is perfectly legal as long as the
> codes/license/serial numbers to go along with it in order to activate
> and use the software are not also provided with the installation
> files, nor have the files been altered in any way to get around the
> use of those codes/serial numbers/licenses.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Michael Barry
> Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 6:59 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Re: Upgrade to 9.05
>
> One might give pause to consider both the wisdom and the ethics of
> utilizing a public forum to solicit someone to violate their company's
> software license agreement.
>
> Michael Barry
> Aspacia Systems Inc
> 866.566.9600
> 312.803.0730 fax
> http://www.aspacia.com/
>
> On Aug 17, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Ned wrote:
>
> > On a side note, I am looking for a copy of CDs for 6.10, and if
> > anyone has them and can either make them downloadable or be willing
> > to upload them for me to my FTP, that would be great, feel free to
> > contact me off list if you would be able to do this for me.
> >
> > Ned
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must
> have already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access.
> )
> (1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder
> and Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
> (2) To search through old msg's goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
> (3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

Useful links for the Yahoo!Groups Vantage Board are: ( Note: You must have
already linked your email address to a yahoo id to enable access. )
(1) To access the Files Section of our Yahoo!Group for Report Builder and
Crystal Reports and other 'goodies', please goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/files/.
(2) To search through old msg's goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/messages
(3) To view links to Vendors that provide Vantage services goto:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vantage/linksYahoo! Groups Links