Are there any known issues using REST v1 instead of v2 in 10.2.500?
Thanks
David
Are there any known issues using REST v1 instead of v2 in 10.2.500?
Thanks
David
Bugs wise or feature wise?
From a feature standpoint I hear the following a lot:
REST v1
REST v2
I thinking bug wise. Like something fixed in v2 that is still not fixed in v1.
I am trying to remember anything glaring but it would be in the release notes.
The thing to remember is that the emphasis on changing versions was to align with the newer OData protocol. The industry is in a mixed state of supporting both 3 and 4 so we need to do the same so half your apps don’t break.
e.g. - There are no plans to even discuss retiring v1 until the industry drops OData v3 which means I am not holding my breathe.
Since the patient was on the table with the v4 uplift and contracts were being broken, we took the time to clean up some of the larger usability complaints around putting company in the URL, etc.
I am curious what others think.