Vantage 6.10.520

Not that I'm aware of, but I will check.

________________________________

From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of Lydia Coffman
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 2:35 PM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Vantage] Vantage 6.10.520



Did someone tinker with the due/scheduled dates?

Lydia

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
[mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com> ]On
Behalf Of Ron LaHolt
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 9:21 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com <mailto:vantage%40yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.10.520

What would be the reason that an operation 20 that show up before an
operation 10 in the work Queue?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
What would be the reason that an operation 20 that show up before an
operation 10 in the work Queue?


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Did someone tinker with the due/scheduled dates?

Lydia

-----Original Message-----
From: vantage@yahoogroups.com [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Ron LaHolt
Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 9:21 AM
To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.10.520



What would be the reason that an operation 20 that show up before an
operation 10 in the work Queue?

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Assuming then that you are using multiple ops in the MOM, check the
scheduling requirements between the operations...that is start to start,
finish to start, or finish to finish.
For example, if op 20 takes longer than op 10, and there is a finish to
finish relationship between them, op 20 would start faster to schedule the
finish at the same time.
C


>From: "Ron LaHolt" <ron@...>
>Reply-To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
>To: <vantage@yahoogroups.com>
>Subject: [Vantage] Vantage 6.10.520
>Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:20:53 -0500
>
>What would be the reason that an operation 20 that show up before an
>operation 10 in the work Queue?
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>