Vantage 8.00.09C

We have a pre-release patch that seems to work fine. 20 some regens
without errors. Hopefully it will be in rev d release. I don't know
for sure though.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "cpsadp" <cpsadp@...> wrote:
>
> And is there a fix for the sync issues?
>
We are about to implement 8.00.09C in production. Appears to fix some
significant bugs in regard to MRP logic. Anyone out there implement
this patch yet and if so have you seen any problems with it.

Joe La Bore
Microdynamics Corp
Yes, still some bugs. We experienced issues that resulted in negative
final balances of one, two, or many items, radomly, after MRP gen.
Turns out to be a Sync issue between MRP and scheduling, that some
users may never see. Expect another patch after c, but c alone did fix
many other outstanding MRP issues.



--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jrlabore" <jrlabore@...> wrote:
>
> We are about to implement 8.00.09C in production. Appears to fix some
> significant bugs in regard to MRP logic. Anyone out there implement
> this patch yet and if so have you seen any problems with it.
>
> Joe La Bore
> Microdynamics Corp
>
We have also seen the fixes in the MRP calculations that we have been
waiting for since May. We found a new bug right after installation.
When using MES for labor capture, there is a problem with the hours
calculated for indirect labor entries.

Scott Way
MIC Industries, Inc.




--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jrlabore" <jrlabore@...> wrote:
>
> We are about to implement 8.00.09C in production. Appears to fix some
> significant bugs in regard to MRP logic. Anyone out there implement
> this patch yet and if so have you seen any problems with it.
>
> Joe La Bore
> Microdynamics Corp
>
For testing purposes - can you tell us when these sync issues arrise?

gsc1161 <gcreighton@...> wrote: Yes, still some bugs. We experienced issues that resulted in negative
final balances of one, two, or many items, radomly, after MRP gen.
Turns out to be a Sync issue between MRP and scheduling, that some
users may never see. Expect another patch after c, but c alone did fix
many other outstanding MRP issues.

--- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jrlabore" <jrlabore@...> wrote:
>
> We are about to implement 8.00.09C in production. Appears to fix some
> significant bugs in regard to MRP logic. Anyone out there implement
> this patch yet and if so have you seen any problems with it.
>
> Joe La Bore
> Microdynamics Corp
>






---------------------------------
Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I wish -- you can check after MRP, run the Time phase report, with
exceptions - below zero - and look for items whose ending balance is
below zero --- if you have them, you have sync issues.

-- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, S L <ilsa_s_lund@...> wrote:
>
> For testing purposes - can you tell us when these sync issues
arrise?
>
> gsc1161 <gcreighton@...> wrote: Yes, still some bugs. We
experienced issues that resulted in negative
> final balances of one, two, or many items, radomly, after MRP gen.
> Turns out to be a Sync issue between MRP and scheduling, that some
> users may never see. Expect another patch after c, but c alone did
fix
> many other outstanding MRP issues.
>
> --- In vantage@yahoogroups.com, "jrlabore" <jrlabore@> wrote:
> >
> > We are about to implement 8.00.09C in production. Appears to fix
some
> > significant bugs in regard to MRP logic. Anyone out there
implement
> > this patch yet and if so have you seen any problems with it.
> >
> > Joe La Bore
> > Microdynamics Corp
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo!
Small Business.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
And is there a fix for the sync issues?