I'll be at Perspectives as well. I'd be happy to
share with you how things are going at that
point...hopefully I won't be the one easy to spot
because I've pulled all my hair out!
--- Mike Lowe <MLowe@...> wrote:
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
share with you how things are going at that
point...hopefully I won't be the one easy to spot
because I've pulled all my hair out!
--- Mike Lowe <MLowe@...> wrote:
> Interesting. At least since you'll be__________________________________________________
> reimplementing you won't have to
> worry about not having the db (the one being
> converted) for the week it
> will be converted.
>
> We've decided to send a contingent of decision
> makers to Perspectives to
> help us in making our decision on whether to upgrade
> and if so, to
> convert or reimplement.
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Mike
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:vantage@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Donna Winges
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 4:33 PM
> To: vantage@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Vantage] Vantage 8 upgrade question -
> Conversion or
> Reimplementation?
>
>
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> We had been planning to upgrade from 3.0 to 8.0, but
> have decided to reimplement and are still in
> process.
> We had epicor convert our data base and the first
> pass
> went well, though it took a long time. Due to the
> size of our database (4.3 Gig) we were told to
> expect
> the final pass to take a week. We will set up as if
> 8.0 were a new implementation but will still have
> our
> old database converted to 8 for history. I didn't
> want to have the 3.0 server hanging around for
> longer
> than necessary.
>
> HTH,
> Donna
> --- Mike Lowe <MLowe@...
> <mailto:MLowe%40connorms.com> > wrote:
>
> > I'm curious if any older Vantage users chose to do
> a
> > new implementation,
> > or more appropriately reimplementation of Vantage
> as
> > opposed to doing a
> > conversion? If you went the reimplementation
> route,
> > do you now keep an
> > old version of 6.1 active for history?
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > removed]
> >
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com <http://mail.yahoo.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
>
>
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com